Elsevier

Injury

Volume 43, Issue 9, September 2012, Pages 1335-1336
Injury

Editorial
Evaluation of a compensation claims management intervention for improving recovery from traumatic injury

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.003Get rights and content

Section snippets

Conflict of interest

The authors (AC, BG and MF) receive research grant funding from the Transport Accident Commission.

Acknowledgments

The evaluation is supported by funding from the Transport Accident Commission (TAC) via the Institute for Safety Compensation and Recovery Research (ISCRR).

References (21)

  • Access Economics

    The economic cost of spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury in Australia

    (2009)
  • S. Ameratunga et al.

    Risk of disability due to car crashes: a review of the literature and methodological issues

    Injury

    (2004)
  • R. Mayou et al.

    Outcome 3 years after a road traffic accident

    Psychosomatic Medicine

    (2002)
  • M. Peden et al.

    World report on road traffic injury prevention

    (2004)
  • D. Redelmeier et al.

    Survivors of motor vehicle trauma: an analysis of seat belt use and health care utilization

    Journal of General Internal Medicine

    (1993)
  • World Health Organization

    Global status report on road safety: time for action

    (2009)
  • P. Cameron et al.

    A statewide system of trauma care in Victoria: effect on patient survival

    MJA

    (2008)
  • G. Henley et al.

    Serious injury due to land transport accidents, Australia 2006–07

    (2009)
  • J. Bull

    Disabilities caused by road traffic accidents and their relation to severity scores

    Accident Analysis and Prevention

    (1985)
  • M. Fitzharris et al.

    General health status and functional disability following injury in traffic crashes

    Traffic Injury Prevention

    (2007)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (3)

  • Financial and employment impacts of serious injury: A qualitative study

    2014, Injury
    Citation Excerpt :

    Key strategies being implemented by the TAC include simpler claims lodgment, faster claims approval, and more timely provision of service approvals, as well as a more patient-centred focus of claims management (David Attwood and Natalie McColl, TAC, personal communication). Given the issues raised by participants in our study, these changes should reduce the financial burden on TAC compensable patients, and processes have been put in place to evaluate the impact of these changes.[30] This large qualitative study of trauma patients’ perceptions of care provides important insights into the issues faced by injured participants, and contributes to our understanding of the economic impacts of injury, groups at risk of financial burden, and areas for improvement in service provision.

c

Building 70, Monash University, Wellington Rd, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.

d

Level 5, Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Rd, Prahran, VIC 3004, Australia.

View full text