Practice variation in common fracture presentations: A survey of orthopaedic surgeons
Introduction
It is generally accepted that systematic reviews of large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) offer the best evidence to guide management decisions. However, surgical trials are challenging as they can involve complex surgical procedures, must accommodate surgeon learning curves (making standardization difficult),1 and use heterogeneous patients, often with urgent surgical problems.19, 24 Well designed trials in orthopaedic surgery are sparse,27 and therefore, the management of common orthopaedic presentations may not be informed by a high level of evidence. Practice variation is a likely corollary of this and variation in orthopaedic as well as non-orthopaedic settings,6, 22, 30, 31, 32 is already well recognized. Whilst practice variation may represent legitimate improvisation for varying clinical scenarios, it may also reflect clinician bias, which may in turn contribute to varying standards of care for the management of common conditions.
The purpose of this study is to describe the management of common fractures amongst orthopaedic surgeons and to explore factors that may explain any observed variation.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
An electronic survey was sent by email to members of the Australian Orthopaedic Association (AOA), all of whom were consultant orthopaedic surgeons. The survey included nine multiple choice questions in total and was divided into two sections.
Section 1 had four questions pertaining to general information about the background of the surgeon: number of years experience as an orthopaedic consultant (0–5, 6–10, 11–15, and 16 and above years); sub-specialities that the surgeon self-identified with;
Results
A total of 803 surveys were sent by email to members of the AOA. Forty three email addresses were not found, and 5 surgeons were unable to complete the survey due to technical problems. A total of 358 responses were received (response rate 47%). 339 responders answered both sections. Most surgeons had experience 16 years and above (41%), with all other respondents divided between 0 to 5, 6 to 10, and 11 to 15 years experience (23%, 20%, and 16% respectively). 67% participated in an on-call
Discussion and conclusions
Our survey demonstrated considerable practice variation in the reported treatment of common fractures amongst orthopaedic surgeons in Australia. The survey participants were divided in their preferences between operative and non-operative management for the case presentations in this survey. Surgeons with a sub-specialty interest, such as hand surgeons and shoulder surgeons, were more likely to operate on fractures within their area of sub-specialty. Overall, less experienced orthopaedic
Conflicts of interest
No author is a recipient of a research scholarship or funding from any source. The paper is not based on a previous communication to a society or meeting.
References (37)
- et al.
Rotator cuff repair as an outpatient procedure
J Shoulder Elbow Surg
(2000) - et al.
Cost-effective carotid endarterectomy in community practice
Ann Vasc Surg
(1995) - et al.
Regional variations in the use of common surgical procedures: within and between England and Wales, Canada and the United States of America
Soc Sci Med A
(1981) - et al.
Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute undisplaced and minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures—a systematic review
Injury
(2009) - et al.
Variations reported in surgical practice for bleeding duodenal ulcers
Am J Surg
(2006) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The Southern Surgeons Club
New Engl J Med
(1991)- et al.
Malleolar fractures: nonoperative versus operative treatment. A controlled study
Clin Orthop Relat Res
(1985) - et al.
Acute nondisplaced fractures of the scaphoid
J Orthop Trauma
(2004) - et al.
The effect of physician practice organization on efficient utilization of hospital resources
Health Serv Res
(1994) Explaining geographic variations. The enthusiasm hypothesis
Med Care
(1993)