Leadership education, certification and resident outcomes in US nursing homes: Cross-sectional secondary data analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.10.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Leadership is a key consideration in improving nursing home care quality. Previous research found nursing homes with more credentialed leaders had lower rates of care deficiencies than nursing homes with less credentialed leaders. Evidence that nursing home administrator (NHA) and director of nursing (DON) education and certification is related to resident outcomes is limited.

Objectives

To examine associations of education and certification among NHAs and DONs with resident outcomes.

Design

Cross-sectional secondary data analysis.

Settings

This study used National Nursing Home Survey data on leadership education and certification and Nursing Home Compare quality outcomes (e.g. pain, catheter use).

Participants

1142 nursing homes in the survey which represented 16628 nursing homes in the US.

Methods

Leadership education and certification were assessed separately for NHAs and DONs. Nursing home resident outcomes were measured using facility-level nursing home quality indicator rates selected from the Minimum Data Set. Facility-level quality indicators were regressed onto leadership variables in models that also held constant facility size and ownership status.

Results

Nursing homes led by NHAs with both Master's degrees or higher and certification had significantly better outcomes for pain. Nursing homes led by DONs with Bachelor's degrees or higher plus certification also had significantly lower pain and catheter use. Whereas pressure ulcer rates were higher in facilities led by DONs with more education.

Conclusions

Selected outcomes for nursing home residents might be improved by increasing the education and certification requirements for NHAs and DONs. Additional research is needed to clarify these relationships.

Introduction

Leadership has been identified as a key consideration in improving nursing home (NH) quality of care (Siegel et al., 2010). The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) identified governance and leadership as a major element of Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement (CMS, 2012). Nursing home leaders, i.e., nursing home administrators (NHAs) and directors of nursing (DONs) have a responsibility to promote and sustain high-quality, cost-effective nursing home care (Seigel et al., 2010). DONs are responsible for the nursing department and all clinical nursing care provided in the facility including care delivery and best practices, clinical data collection, appropriate staffing and hiring. The NHA is responsible for the administration of all departments and oversight of the facility to maximize resident quality of life and quality of care, including costs and budgeting, supervision and management of staff, facility and physical plant, and compliance with regulations (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2009, LTCPLC, 2007).

Both generate policies that implement regulations and requirements to ensure that residents are provided with proper care. Yet, often among these leaders there is a lack of specific education focused on clinical leadership and health team management (Dwyer, 2011). In the US, educational qualifications vary and are largely predicated on our system of reimbursement and payment for long term care. To qualify for reimbursement of care provided, NHAs must have a Bachelor's degree, pass an NHA exam and have a precepted experience, and DONs must be registered nurses (RNs) (CMS, 2008). Taking additional classes through formal education (e.g., Bachelor's or Master's degree programs for DONs and NHAs, respectively) and/or obtaining specialty certifications through targeted coursework and examinations, can allow administrators to be exposed to a wider array of strategies and resources. Resident outcomes can be influenced by organizational components such as the education and credentials of those managing the facility. The diversity of qualifications for nursing home leadership across facilities provides an opportunity to assess the impact of leadership credentials, i.e., education and certification, on resident outcomes.

Nursing home leadership has been linked with care deficiencies that occur when facilities fail to meet certain federal regulatory care standards, as judged by state inspection teams (CMS, 2013). Nursing homes with more highly credentialed directors and leaders (certified by or belonging to long term care professional associations) had lower rates of deficiencies compared to those with less credentialed leaders (Castle and Fogel, 2002, Rowland et al., 2009). Nursing home quality indicators (QIs) have also been linked to leadership style and length of time in the position for both NHAs and DONs (Decker and Castle, 2011, Krause, 2012). However, the evidence that educational preparation and certification of NHAs and DONs is related to quality outcomes is limited. In this study we explore whether increased leadership credentials (e.g., education and certification) for NHAs and DONs are associated with better NH quality outcomes as measured by lower QI rates. We also examine the impact of specific certifications on resident outcomes.

Our conceptual framework was based on the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model (Carayon et al., 2006). This draws from Donabedian's structure process-outcome model (Donabedian, 1972) by emphasizing how work system design (e.g., leadership: education and certifications) are linked to resident outcomes through greater knowledge and awareness of optimal care processes. Leaders can use this knowledge to improve care in their facilities, resulting in better resident outcomes, (e.g., lower rates of pressure ulcers or pain). For example, geriatric nursing specialty certification could help leaders to identify best practices for pain assessment for elderly populations. Management training, as is presented in Bachelor's or Master's degree programs, could help leaders develop the ability to articulate a vision of quality care to nursing staff. A DON or NHA with additional leadership training also might be better able to motivate others and to serve as a change agent for best practices (e.g., avoiding catheter use) that will translate into improved care (Anderson et al., 2003). If leadership education and certifications are related to improved care, findings also could support recommendations to improve leadership preparation.

Section snippets

Design and data sources

This secondary analysis merged data from two national administrative databases. The 2004 National Nursing Home Survey (NNHS) was the source for leadership data and information on facility characteristics (NCHS, 2009). The NNHS used a complex sampling strategy (e.g., multi-stage, stratified sampling) to select 1500 nursing homes representative of the 16,628 nursing homes in the U.S. (Squillace et al., 2007). Administrators at 1174 of the selected nursing homes completed computer assisted

Nursing home characteristics

According to these nationally representative data, 32% of NHAs had a Master's degree or higher and 43% of DONs had Bachelor's degrees or higher (Table 2). Just over a quarter of NHAs (28%) had at least one of the examined certifications; proportion of NHAs certified by CNHA and ANCC-unspecified were 25% and 3%, respectively. Whereas among DONs, nearly half (43%), had at least one certification, with NADONA (15%) and ANCC-gerontological (10%) most common. Ten percent of DONs had one of these

Discussion

Our study provides important findings relating leadership education and certification to nursing home resident outcomes. Nursing homes led by NHAs with both certification (CNHA and/or ANCC-unspecified) and a Master's degree or higher had better resident outcomes for pain. Education alone also was important among NHAs in relation to decreased adverse outcomes. For NHAs with ANCC certification, better resident outcomes for low-risk pressure ulcers were noted. Because ANCC certification is only

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (Grants R40009 and R60006).

Ethical approval

The Institutional Review Board of the University of Maryland, Baltimore reviewed and approved this study (IRB protocol number: HP-00049284).

References (36)

  • T.T. Barry et al.

    Measuring worker turnover in long-term care: lessons from the better jobs better care demonstration

    Gerontologist

    (2008)
  • P. Carayon et al.

    Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model

    Qual. Saf. Health Care

    (2006)
  • N.G. Castle et al.

    Organizational characteristics associated with staff turnover in nursing homes

    Gerontologist

    (2006)
  • N.G. Castle et al.

    Professional association membership by nursing facility administrators and quality of care

    Health Care Manage. Rev.

    (2002)
  • N.G. Castle

    Measuring staff turnover in nursing homes

    Gerontologist

    (2006)
  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)

    CMS Manual System

    (2008)
  • Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

    MDS Quality Measure/Indicator Report

    (2012)
  • Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

    Medicare.gov: Nursing Home Compare

    (2013)
  • Cited by (24)

    • State Variation in Long-Term Care Availability, Regulation, and Cost and Suicide Mortality Among Older Adults in the United States: 2010–2015

      2021, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
      Citation Excerpt :

      Alternatively, larger nursing home capacity may indicate fewer nursing staff hours per resident,33 less frequent monitoring of resident mental health, and lower engagement with care providers.34–36 Regardless of the specific processes determining this association, an association at the state level is meaningful, as it indicates that suicide risk in LTC may be responsive to statewide policies shaping this sector.22–25 The potential influence of policies governing LTC size and capacity, therefore, parallels that of other state policies.29,30,37

    • Addressing Workforce Needs in Skilled Nursing Facilities

      2020, Nurse Leader
      Citation Excerpt :

      With only 1% of RNs nationally holding this certification, this is a significant achievement for SNC RNs. As noted in the study by Trinkoff et al,16 this also supports improved patient outcomes. In many SNCs, patient populations include those with heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and respiratory disease.

    • Empowerment of learning and knowledge: Appreciating professional development for registered nurses in aged residential care

      2020, Nurse Education in Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Leadership plays a pivotal role in practice. Defined as someone who promotes health and helps to build teams, who can network with other health professionals and relative agencies, a leader has the confidence to develop innovative practices and solutions to improve services within a context of uncertainty (O'Rourke, 2001; Trinkoff et al., 2015). They also have a significant contribution to make to specialty development (Adeniran et al., 2013).

    • Director of Nursing Perceptions of Physicians' Roles in US Nursing Homes

      2019, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
    • The relationship between specialty nurse certification and patient, nurse and organizational outcomes: A systematic review

      2019, International Journal of Nursing Studies
      Citation Excerpt :

      A GRADE rating of “very low” was assigned. Trinkoff et al. (2015) reported a decrease of 16.7% (β=-0182, p < .001) in catheter use among aged care residents (n = 1142 nursing homes) when the director of nursing was a certified nurse. Individual studies reported on a range of outcomes including surgical wounds (Bliss et al., 2013), urinary incontinence (Bliss et al., 2013), bowel incontinence (Bliss et al., 2013), urinary tract infections (Bliss et al., 2013), restraint (Boltz et al., 2013), documentation of pain (Coleman et al., 2009; Frank-Stromborg et al., 2002), nausea (Coleman et al., 2009), fatigue (Frank-Stromborg et al., 2002), medication errors (Kendall-Gallagher and Blegen, 2009), and ventilator associated pneumonia (Krapohl et al., 2010).

    • Policy Priorities for a Well-Prepared Nursing Home Workforce

      2023, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funded by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing Grant R60006 (A. Trinkoff, PI).

    View full text