Fibrates in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus – A pooled meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.11.211Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Fibrates are thought to be useful anti-dyslipidemic agents particularly in patients with diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia characterized by high triglyceride (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term randomized controlled trials to evaluate the role of fibrates in the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Data sources

English-language journals indexed in Index Medicus/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration databases (through December 2007), unpublished data from selected clinical trials.

Data extraction and analysis

A total of 11,590 patients from 6 published randomized placebo-controlled trials were analyzed using pooled meta-analysis techniques. Relative risks were computed for various cardiovascular outcomes and mortality, and statistical significance was tested using the z-test statistic (two-sided alpha error < 0.05).

Results

The use of fibrates did not significantly affect the risk of all-cause mortality or cardiac mortality, and also did not affect the risk of stroke, unstable angina, or invasive coronary revascularization. However, the relative risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction was significantly reduced by about 21% (pooled relative risk 0.79, p = 0.006) with the use of fibrates.

Conclusions

Long-term use of fibrates in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus significantly reduces the risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction, but has no significant effect on mortality or on other adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Introduction

The risk of coronary heart disease is about 3–4 fold higher in patients with diabetes mellitus, and heart disease death rates in adults with heart disease and diabetes are about 2–4 times higher than adults without diabetes [1]. Recent epidemiologic data show that in terms of risk for adverse cardiovascular events, the presence of diabetes mellitus requiring glucose-lowering therapy in adults > 30 years of age is a coronary artery disease equivalent [2]. Dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterized by high triglyceride (TG) levels, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, and a preponderance of small, dense, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) particles [3], [4]. Although the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG coA) reductase inhibitors or ‘statins’ have been shown to significantly reduce LDL-C levels and change the LDL-C subclass distribution towards larger particles, they do not specifically address the high TG levels and low HDL-C levels observed in diabetic patients, both of which have been shown to be independent predictors for occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events [5], [6], [7].

Since the serendipitous discovery of clofibrate as an effective anti-lipidemic agent in the mid-1960s [8], the fibrate class of agents has been the subject of scientific inquiry both in the laboratory as well as in large randomized clinical trials. The fibrates significantly reduce TG levels and raise HDL-C levels, and have a variable effect on LDL-C levels [9], [10]. They have also been shown to alter the LDL-C subclass distribution towards larger, more buoyant particles, especially in patients with diabetes [4]. These data suggest that fibrates would be ideal agents for the management of dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. In the late 1980s, the fibrates were shown to have agonist effects on the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) group of nuclear receptors, which control the expression of key elements in cholesterol transport and lipid metabolism, as well as endothelial function, vascular inflammation and remodeling [11], [12], [13], [14]. However, in spite of the plethora of molecular [15], [16], [17] and in vivo data (both in animals and in human studies) [18], [19], [20], [21], [22] suggesting the potential for fibrates in reducing the cardiovascular risk in patients, including those with features associated with the metabolic syndrome and ‘diabetic dyslipidemia’ [23], results from large randomized clinical trials have yielded conflicting results. We therefore conducted a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials to define the role of fibrates in the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus – the subpopulation in which fibrates are thought to have the greatest potential.

Section snippets

Data sources and study selection

The QUOROM [24] guidelines for the reporting of meta-analyses were used in formulating this meta-analysis and review. We conducted a systematic search of the Index Medicus/MEDLINE databases [(1966–December 2007) (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA] and the Cochrane Collaboration databases for randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials using fibrates for prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus, both in people without (primary prevention) and

Study design and participants

Table 1 summarizes the salient features of the six trials included in the current meta-analysis. Our systematic search also identified two additional placebo-controlled studies using bezafibrate [36], [37], but since the number of diabetic patients was small in both these trials and actual clinical event rates in the diabetic subgroup were not made available to the authors, they were excluded from the current meta-analysis. Three of these trials [22], [32], [33] were exclusively conducted in

Discussion

Limited data from the HHS [27] showed that although the lipid-lowering effects of gemfibrozil were less in NIDDM patients as compared to the overall study population, the incidence of coronary heart disease (myocardial infarction and cardiac death) was reduced to a greater extent (absolute reduction in CHD incidence 7.1% in NIDDM patients versus 1.4% overall). The VA-HIT study also reported that the lipid-lowering effects of gemfibrozil were lower in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but

Limitations

Individual patient data were not available for the current meta-analysis, which precluded further sensitivity analyses based on patients' baseline clinical parameters, as well as baseline and on-treatment lipid levels. We also could not reliably compute numbers needed to treat from the available data due to the differences in the cardiovascular risk profiles of the patients in the selected trials. Two studies were excluded from the current analysis due to non-availability of actual clinical

Conclusions

Pooled meta-analysis of data from long-term, randomized clinical trials reveals that the use of fibrates significantly decreased the risk of non-fatal MI in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but had no significant effect on other adverse cardiovascular events, mortality, or the incidence of cancer. However, these analyses are limited due to lack of individual patient data, pharmacological differences between the various fibrate drugs, and the considerable effect of the large FIELD trial

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the corresponding authors – Dr Alexander Tenenbaum and Professor Solomon Behar (BIP trial), as well as Dr Hanna Bloomfield Rubins and Dr Dorothea Collins (VA-HIT) for providing us with unpublished data used in the current meta-analysis.

The authors of this manuscript have certified that they comply with the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology [43].

References (43)

  • A.P. Verhagen et al.

    The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1998)
  • R. DerSimonian et al.

    Meta-analysis in clinical trials

    Control Clin Trials

    (1986)
  • G. Ruotolo et al.

    Treatment effects on serum lipoprotein lipids, apolipoproteins and low density lipoprotein particle size and relationships of lipoprotein variables to progression of coronary artery disease in the bezafibrate coronary atherosclerosis intervention trial (BECAIT)

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1998)
  • A.O. Carter et al.

    A survey identified publication bias in the secondary literature

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (2006 Mar)
  • A.J. Coats

    Ethical authorship and publishing

    Int J Cardiol

    (2009)
  • No authors listed. Complications of Diabetes in the United States. Available on the American Diabetes Association...
  • T.K. Schramm et al.

    Diabetes patients requiring glucose-lowering therapy and nondiabetics with a prior myocardial infarction carry the same cardiovascular risk

    Circulation

    (2008)
  • J. Shepherd

    Dyslipidaemia in diabetic patients: time for a rethink

    Diabetes Obes Metab

    (2007)
  • M. Rizzo et al.

    The clinical relevance of LDL size and subclasses modulation in patients with type-2 diabetes

    Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes

    (2007)
  • D.J. Gordon et al.

    High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. Four prospective American studies

    Circulation

    (1989)
  • J.L. de Gennes et al.

    Results of atromid or CPIB treatment with and without androsterone in hyperlipemia (110 therapeutic trials in 2 years)

    Bull Mem Soc Med Hop Paris

    (1965)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Preventive Cardiology

      2022, Practical Cardiology: Principles and Approaches
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The results of this study were presented in part at a plenary session during the 14th World Congress on Heart Disease held in Toronto, Ontario, Canada in July 2008.

    View full text