Fibrates in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus – A pooled meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials☆
Introduction
The risk of coronary heart disease is about 3–4 fold higher in patients with diabetes mellitus, and heart disease death rates in adults with heart disease and diabetes are about 2–4 times higher than adults without diabetes [1]. Recent epidemiologic data show that in terms of risk for adverse cardiovascular events, the presence of diabetes mellitus requiring glucose-lowering therapy in adults > 30 years of age is a coronary artery disease equivalent [2]. Dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterized by high triglyceride (TG) levels, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, and a preponderance of small, dense, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) particles [3], [4]. Although the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG coA) reductase inhibitors or ‘statins’ have been shown to significantly reduce LDL-C levels and change the LDL-C subclass distribution towards larger particles, they do not specifically address the high TG levels and low HDL-C levels observed in diabetic patients, both of which have been shown to be independent predictors for occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events [5], [6], [7].
Since the serendipitous discovery of clofibrate as an effective anti-lipidemic agent in the mid-1960s [8], the fibrate class of agents has been the subject of scientific inquiry both in the laboratory as well as in large randomized clinical trials. The fibrates significantly reduce TG levels and raise HDL-C levels, and have a variable effect on LDL-C levels [9], [10]. They have also been shown to alter the LDL-C subclass distribution towards larger, more buoyant particles, especially in patients with diabetes [4]. These data suggest that fibrates would be ideal agents for the management of dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. In the late 1980s, the fibrates were shown to have agonist effects on the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) group of nuclear receptors, which control the expression of key elements in cholesterol transport and lipid metabolism, as well as endothelial function, vascular inflammation and remodeling [11], [12], [13], [14]. However, in spite of the plethora of molecular [15], [16], [17] and in vivo data (both in animals and in human studies) [18], [19], [20], [21], [22] suggesting the potential for fibrates in reducing the cardiovascular risk in patients, including those with features associated with the metabolic syndrome and ‘diabetic dyslipidemia’ [23], results from large randomized clinical trials have yielded conflicting results. We therefore conducted a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials to define the role of fibrates in the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus – the subpopulation in which fibrates are thought to have the greatest potential.
Section snippets
Data sources and study selection
The QUOROM [24] guidelines for the reporting of meta-analyses were used in formulating this meta-analysis and review. We conducted a systematic search of the Index Medicus/MEDLINE databases [(1966–December 2007) (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA] and the Cochrane Collaboration databases for randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials using fibrates for prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus, both in people without (primary prevention) and
Study design and participants
Table 1 summarizes the salient features of the six trials included in the current meta-analysis. Our systematic search also identified two additional placebo-controlled studies using bezafibrate [36], [37], but since the number of diabetic patients was small in both these trials and actual clinical event rates in the diabetic subgroup were not made available to the authors, they were excluded from the current meta-analysis. Three of these trials [22], [32], [33] were exclusively conducted in
Discussion
Limited data from the HHS [27] showed that although the lipid-lowering effects of gemfibrozil were less in NIDDM patients as compared to the overall study population, the incidence of coronary heart disease (myocardial infarction and cardiac death) was reduced to a greater extent (absolute reduction in CHD incidence 7.1% in NIDDM patients versus 1.4% overall). The VA-HIT study also reported that the lipid-lowering effects of gemfibrozil were lower in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but
Limitations
Individual patient data were not available for the current meta-analysis, which precluded further sensitivity analyses based on patients' baseline clinical parameters, as well as baseline and on-treatment lipid levels. We also could not reliably compute numbers needed to treat from the available data due to the differences in the cardiovascular risk profiles of the patients in the selected trials. Two studies were excluded from the current analysis due to non-availability of actual clinical
Conclusions
Pooled meta-analysis of data from long-term, randomized clinical trials reveals that the use of fibrates significantly decreased the risk of non-fatal MI in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but had no significant effect on other adverse cardiovascular events, mortality, or the incidence of cancer. However, these analyses are limited due to lack of individual patient data, pharmacological differences between the various fibrate drugs, and the considerable effect of the large FIELD trial
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the corresponding authors – Dr Alexander Tenenbaum and Professor Solomon Behar (BIP trial), as well as Dr Hanna Bloomfield Rubins and Dr Dorothea Collins (VA-HIT) for providing us with unpublished data used in the current meta-analysis.
The authors of this manuscript have certified that they comply with the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology [43].
References (43)
The role of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in the prevention and treatment of coronary heart disease: expert group recommendations
Am J Cardiol
(2002)- et al.
Hypertriglyceridemia and cardiovascular risk reduction
Clin Ther
(2007) - et al.
Efficacy and safety of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increasing compounds: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2005) - et al.
PPARα in atherosclerosis and inflammation
Biochim Biophys Acta
(2007) - et al.
PPARα and dyslipidemia
Biochim Biophys Acta
(2007) - et al.
Fenofibrate induces plaque regression in hypercholesterolemic atherosclerotic rabbits: in vivo demonstration by high-resolution MRI
Atherosclerosis
(2007) - et al.
Reduction of atherosclerosis by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonist fenofibrate in mice
J Biol Chem
(2002) - et al.
Angiographic assessment of effects of bezafibrate on progression of coronary artery disease in young male postinfarction patients
Lancet
(1996) - et al.
Comparison of effects of simvastatin alone versus fenofibrate alone versus simvastatin plus fenofibrate on lipoprotein subparticle profiles in diabetic patients with mixed dyslipidemia (from the Diabetes and Combined Lipid Therapy Regimen study)
Am J Cardiol
(2008) - et al.
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
Lancet
(1999)
The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus
J Clin Epidemiol
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
Control Clin Trials
Treatment effects on serum lipoprotein lipids, apolipoproteins and low density lipoprotein particle size and relationships of lipoprotein variables to progression of coronary artery disease in the bezafibrate coronary atherosclerosis intervention trial (BECAIT)
J Am Coll Cardiol
A survey identified publication bias in the secondary literature
J Clin Epidemiol
Ethical authorship and publishing
Int J Cardiol
Diabetes patients requiring glucose-lowering therapy and nondiabetics with a prior myocardial infarction carry the same cardiovascular risk
Circulation
Dyslipidaemia in diabetic patients: time for a rethink
Diabetes Obes Metab
The clinical relevance of LDL size and subclasses modulation in patients with type-2 diabetes
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. Four prospective American studies
Circulation
Results of atromid or CPIB treatment with and without androsterone in hyperlipemia (110 therapeutic trials in 2 years)
Bull Mem Soc Med Hop Paris
Cited by (58)
Preventive Cardiology
2022, Practical Cardiology: Principles and ApproachesRecommendations for the management of cardiac and renal risk in the patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus
2020, Revista Colombiana de Cardiologia2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD
2020, Revista Espanola de Cardiologia
- ☆
The results of this study were presented in part at a plenary session during the 14th World Congress on Heart Disease held in Toronto, Ontario, Canada in July 2008.