Antimicrobial Stewardship

Open tibia fractures frequently occur following high-energy trauma. Contamination of the fracture site combined with limited soft tissue coverage and blood supply means that these open fractures are associated with a high rate of complications, including fracture related infection (FRI). FRI is associated with lowered patient outcomes and requires early recognition and appropriate surgical and medical management.

The current evidence on FRI after open tibial fractures largely is limited to case series, small retrospective cohort studies and expert opinion. Recent expert consensus has produced guidelines with the aim of standardising care for these patients. This review summarises the current management strategies employed in treating FRI following open tibial fractures and where possible the evidence behind them.

The significantly higher mortality rate in the critical illness patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) infection is linked to inappropriate selecting of empirical treatment. Traditional local antibiogram provides clinicians the resistant rate of a single antimicrobial agent to the pathogen in the specific setting. The information is valuable to the clinicians in selecting suitable empirical antibiotic therapy. However, traditional local antibiogram can only provide information for single agent empirical antibiotic not combination regimens. The combination antibiogram should be developed to facilitate the selection of appropriate antibiotics to broader the coverage rate of resistant PA.

The susceptibility to the β-lactam antibiotics (piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ), ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, or meropenem) or to those administered in combination with an aminoglycoside (gentamicin or amikacin) or fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin) was calculated. The chi-square test was used to compare the differences of combination coverage rates between non-ICU and ICU isolates.

880 PA isolates were isolated during study period. The susceptibility of single agents ranged from 83.1% to 89.7%. The combination regimens containing amikacin provide the highest cover rate (98.9%–99.1%) and those containing levofloxacin provide less coverage rate (92.3%–93.9%). The susceptibility to five β-lactam single agents in ICU isolates significantly lower than non-ICU isolates. The non-ICU isolates exhibited significantly higher susceptibility to the PTZ–gentamicin (p = 0.002) and ceftazidime–gentamicin (p = 0.025) than ICU isolates.

Our results support the use of aminoglycosides instead of fluoroquinolones as additive agents in empirical combination treatments for patients with critical infections caused by PA.

PCR-based testing has transformed the management of suspected respiratory viral infections. We aimed to determine whether multiplex bacterial PCR of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid aids antibiotic stewardship in patients with pneumonia.

This investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised controlled trial was conducted at two tertiary care centres in Switzerland (University Hospital of Basel and Kantonsspital St Gallen). Patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted to hospital with suspected pneumonia, had a clinical indication for bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage, and were at risk of Gram-negative bacterial infection were included. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the multiplex bacterial PCR group or the conventional microbiology control group using a random allocation sequence. Treating physicians were not masked, but the committee panel was masked to patient randomisation. All patients underwent bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage and samples were assessed by conventional microbiological culture (and additionally, in the PCR group, by multiplex bacterial PCR for Gram-negative rods using the Unyvero Hospitalized Pneumonia [HPN] Cartridge; Curetis, Holzgerlingen, Germany). Patients received empirical antibiotic therapy as clinically indicated by the treating physician. In the PCR group, a recommendation regarding antibiotic therapy was made approximately 5 h after taking the sample. The primary outcome was the time in hours on inappropriate antibiotic therapy from bronchoscopy to discharge or to 30 days after bronchoscopy. This trial was registered with the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ISRCTN95828556.

Between May 31, 2017, and Sept 25, 2019, 740 patients with pneumonia were screened for eligibility and 208 were included and randomly assigned to the PCR group (n=100) or conventional microbiology control group (n=108). The mean age of patients was 65·9 years (SD 14·0) and 135 (65%) were male. After daily follow-up until hospital discharge or for a maximum of 30 days, the duration of inappropriate antibiotic treatment was significantly shorter by 38·6 h (95% CI 19·5–57·7) in the PCR group than in the control group (adjusted mean 47·1 h [34·7–59·5] vs 85·7 h [78·8–95·6]; p<0·0001), which translates as a decrease in the duration of inappropriate antibiotic therapy of 45·0% (37·9–52·1). Adverse events due to antimicrobial therapy occurred in nine patients (five [5%] in the PCR group vs four [4%] in the control group) and due to bronchoscopy occurred in four patients (two [1%] vs two [1%]). There were eight (8%) deaths in the PCR group and 11 (10%) in the control group. All in-hospital deaths were attributed to a respiratory cause.

Multiplex bacterial PCR examination of bronchoalveolar lavage decreases the duration of inappropriate antibiotic therapy of patients admitted to hospital with pneumonia and at risk of Gram-negative rod infection. This approach warrants further consideration in future antibiotic stewardship strategies.

Curetis and the Clinic of Respiratory Medicine and Pulmonary Cell Research, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.

Community health care accounts for the vast majority of antibiotic use in Europe. Given the threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), there is an urgent need to develop new antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions in primary care that could involve different health care providers, including community pharmacists.

This study aimed to explore the perceptions, currents practices, and interventions of community pharmacists regarding AMS.

Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with community pharmacists in France. Participants were recruited through a professional organization of community pharmacists combined with a snowballing technique. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used while developing the interview guide and carrying out thematic analysis.

Sixteen community pharmacists participated. All the respondents had good awareness about antimicrobial resistance and believed that community pharmacists had an important role in tackling AMR. Some barriers to community pharmacists’ participation in AMS were identified such as difficult interactions with prescribers, lack of time, and lack of access to patient medical records and diagnosis. Increased patient education, audits and feedback of antibiotic prescribing, increased point-of-care testing, and delayed prescribing were interventions suggested by the pharmacists to improve antibiotic use in primary care. Strategies cited by participants to facilitate the implementation of such interventions are increased pharmacist–general practitioner collaboration, specialized training, clinical decision support tools, and financial incentives.

This study suggests that community pharmacists could play a greater role in infection management and AMS interventions. Further interprofessional collaboration is needed to optimize antibiotic prescribing and utilization in community health care.

To evaluate antimicrobial stewards’ experiences of using a dashboard display integrating local and national antibiotic use data implemented in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). This paper reports early formative evaluation.

Qualitative interviewing.

Eight VA hospitals participated with established antimicrobial stewardship (AS) programs participated in the pilot.

Six infectious disease physicians and eight clinical pharmacists agreed to be interviewed (n = 14).

A 3-part qualitative interview script was used involving a description of local stewardship activities, a Critical Incident description of dashboard use, and general questions regarding attitudes towards the tool. An inductive open coding approach was used for analysis.

We found 4 themes showing the complexities of using stewardship tools: (1) Data validity is socially negotiated; (2) Performance feedback motivates and persuades social goals when situated in an empirical distribution; (3) Shared problem awareness is aided by authoritative data; and (4) The AS dashboard encourages connections with local quality improvement culture.

Social dimensions of AS tool use emerged as distinct from, and equally important as decision support provided by the dashboard. Successful stewardship tools should be designed to support both the social and cognitive needs of users.

Preterm infants are susceptible to infections that can rapidly progress to disastrous outcomes. Antibiotics are lifesaving, but their prolonged and inappropriate use are associated with adverse outcomes. In this review, we discuss the current status of antimicrobial use in the preterm neonatal population, and the challenges in determining the initiation, duration, and choice of antibiotics. Finally, we review the clinical studies on the potential consequences of prolonged antimicrobial exposure in prematurely born infants.