Framework for assessing governance of the health system in developing countries: Gateway to good governance
Introduction
Governance is thought to be a key determinant of economic growth, social advancement and overall development, as well as for the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals in low- and middle-income countries. The former Secretary General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan’s statement that “good governance is perhaps the single most important factor in eradicating poverty and promoting development” is an apt reflection its need [1]. Health is the subject of Transparency International’s Global corruption report 2006, which acknowledges the vast scale of corruption in rich and poor countries however the poor are disproportionately affected, thus reinforcing the need for good governance for better health outcomes [2].
Governance is not about governments alone. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) defines governance as the exercise of political, economic and administrative authority in the management of a country’s affairs at all levels. Governance comprises the complex mechanisms, processes and institutions through which citizens and groups articulate their interests, mediate their differences and exercise their legal rights and obligations.
Despite the growing discourse on governance [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], the literature on governance of the health system is not particularly abundant. Health systems governance concerns the actions and means adopted by a society to organize itself in the promotion and protection of the health of its population [9]. In the broadest sense, this includes the institutions – the formal and informal rules that shape behavior – and the organizations that operate within these rules to carry out the key functions of a health system [10]. The World health report 2000 proposed stewardship as one of the four main functions of the health system, along with financing, creating and managing resources, and service delivery [11]. It recognized stewardship as the function of the government responsible for the welfare of the population and concerned about the trust and legitimacy with which its activities are viewed by the citizenry [11], [12], [13], [14]. Good stewardship is thus at the essence of good governance in health. However, assessing governance and stewardship has been elusive.
Section snippets
Purpose and rationale
The purpose of this article is to present a framework developed to assess the governance of the health system at national and sub-national levels. In doing so, the paper first summarizes contemporary issues in relation to the governance of the health system. Second, the different frameworks for the assessment of health system governance are reviewed. Third, the proposed health system governance principles and the assessment framework are presented. Fourth, the findings of the application of the
Contemporary issues in the governance of the health system
Health systems governance is currently a critical concern in many countries because of increasing demand to demonstrate results and accountability in the health sector, at a time when increasing resources are being put into health systems where institutional contexts are changing rapidly. An assessment framework will need to address a number of key issues summarized below.
Existing frameworks for assessing governance
Currently, a framework for assessing health system governance in countries does not exist. Prior to developing such a framework we extensively reviewed four frameworks developed for the analysis and measurement of national governance, which are briefly explored in this section. These are: (i) World Health Organization’s (WHO) domains of stewardship; (ii) Pan American Health Organization’s (PAHO) essential public health functions (EPHF); (iii) World Bank’s six basic aspects of governance; (iv)
Principles and framework for assessing health system governance
The framework for assessing HSG while adapting the widely accepted UNDP definition and the principles of governance [3], has incorporated key parameters relevant to health as articulated in the WHO’s domains of stewardship, PAHO’s essential public health functions and World Bank’s aspects of governance.
Applying the health system governance framework in a country setting
The analytical framework has been used to assess HSG in some low- and middle-income countries the results of which are being shared in a separate paper. The primary purpose of this section is to illustrate its applicability in a country setting. The HSG matrix of Pakistan for all 10 principles at the three assessment levels is illustrated in Table 3. The assessment was undertaken by a reputed civil society organization, the Heartfile in 2006, and is based on an extensive review of documents and
Appraisal of the HSG framework
There have been efforts in the past to determine the influence of governance on specific health problems such as HIV/AIDS [36], or characteristics of effective governance in community health partnership [37]. To the best of our knowledge this is the first framework that assesses governance of a national health system. The strength of this assessment framework is that governance principles are itemized into domains, and broad and specific questions that lend themselves to assessment of HSG at
Policy implications of assessing health system governance
Assessing HSG has several policy implications since it is the gateway to good governance in health. First, it raises the level of awareness among national and health policymakers of the importance of governance as a function of the health system and its influence on all other health system functions and health outcomes. It provides an avenue for debate on a subject that is often ‘pushed under the carpet’. Second, there are policy implications of assessing each governance principle, whether it
References (38)
- et al.
Future health systems: why future? Why now?
Social Science and Medicine
(2008) - et al.
Regulating India’s health services: to what end? What future?
Social Science and Medicine
(2008) - United Nations Organization. Partnerships for global community: annual report on the work of the organisation; 1998....
- Transparency International. Global corruption report 2006: health and corruption; 2006....
- United Nations Development Programme. Governance for sustainable human development: a UNDP policy document. New York:...
- Kaufman D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M. Measuring governance using cross-country perceptions data. The World Bank; 2005....
- Graham J, Amos B, Plumptre T. Principles for good governance in the 21st century. Policy brief no. 15. Ottawa, Canada:...
- Overseas Development Institute. Briefing Paper: governance, development and aid effectiveness: a quick guide to complex...
- Kaufmann D, Kraay A. Governance and growth: causality which way?—Evidence for the world, in brief. World Bank; 2003....
- International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. A decade of measuring the quality of governance....
Institutions, institutional change and economic performance
The concept of stewardship in health policy. Geneva
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
A framework for assessing the performance of health systems
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Health systems commercialization: in search of good sense
Cited by (238)
What does it take to make a wrong decision? A qualitative study from Pakistan's health sector
2023, Dialogues in HealthIndividualism, economic development, and democracy as determinants of COVID-19 risk information on 132 government websites
2023, Preventive Medicine ReportsInstitutionalization for good governance to reach sustainable health development: a framework analysis
2024, Globalization and Health“Health promotion governance”: A framework for operationalizing the Ottawa charter mechanisms in health system governance
2024, World Medical and Health PolicyPublic-Private Partnerships in Mexico: Implications of Engaging With the Food and Beverage Industry for Public Health Nutrition
2024, International Journal of Health Policy and ManagementCovid-19 lockdown governance in Uttar Pradesh, India: a call for equity?
2024, Cogent Social Sciences