Elsevier

Hand Clinics

Volume 25, Issue 1, February 2009, Pages 125-143
Hand Clinics

Knowledge Translation: Putting the “Practice” in Evidence-Based Practice

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2008.10.003Get rights and content

Knowledge translation (KT) is an iterative process that involves knowledge development, synthesis, contextualization, and adaptation, with the expressed purpose of moving the best evidence into practice that results in better health processes and outcomes for patients. Optimization of the process requires engaged interaction between knowledge developers and knowledge users. Knowledge users include consumers, clinicians, and policy makers. KT is highly reliant on understanding when research evidence needs to be moved into practice. Social, personal, policy, and system factors contribute to how and when change in practice can be accomplished. Evidence-based practitioners need to understand a conceptual basis for KT and the evidence indicating which specific KT strategies might help them move best evidence into action in practice. Audit and feedback, knowledge brokering, clinical practice guidelines, professional standards, and “active-learning” continuing education are examples of KT strategies.

Section snippets

Evidence must be moved into action to accomplish health benefits

You ask me why I do not write something….I think one's feelings waste themselves in words, they ought all to be distilled into actions and into actions which bring results.

—Florence Nightingale, in Cecil Woodham-Smith, Florence Nightingale (1951); English nurse in Crimean War (1820–1910)

EBP hinges on the assumption that once new (higher-quality) knowledge is generated, it will be applied/implemented. When knowledge is available and is not used, a gap is created between knowledge and practice or

The evidence–practice gap in hand surgery and therapy

The way to answer this question is to examine the evidence on practice patterns and compare them with the best available evidence. The authors looked for examples of where practice patterns had been studied and then compared those with the available evidence.

Perhaps the most studied aspect of practice attitudes and patterns is the use of hand surgery for the rheumatoid hand. Thanks to a series of surveys conducted by Alderman and Chung1 and their co-investigators, we have some indication of the

Knowledge-to-action cycle

KT is optimized if research informs practice and practice informs research, which is best accomplished by the engagement of knowledge developers and different end users in sustained partnerships that contribute to all aspects of the generation and use of new knowledge. This process has been well described in the knowledge-to-action (KTA) cycle (Fig. 1). It contains iterative cycles of knowledge creation and application (action). Knowledge creation can begin with individual research studies, be

Why do evidence–practice gaps exist? Barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice

Evidence–practice gaps evolve in two basic areas. One is related to EBP itself and the other is related to changing behavior.

Gaps may exist because of a lack of awareness of how to practice EBP or because of barriers to practicing it once these skills are developed. Numerous studies have addressed these barriers and consistently found that lack of awareness of how to search the literature, lack of critical appraisal skills, and, most importantly, lack of time are perceived barriers to

Theoretic aspects of knowledge translation

All human actions have one or more of these seven causes: chance, nature, compulsion, habit, reason, passion, and desire.

—Aristotle, Greek critic, philosopher, physicist, and zoologist (384 bc–322 bc)

Practical aspects of knowledge translation

Everybody gets so much information all day long that they lose their common sense.

—Gertrude Stein, American author in France (1874–1946)

No theory fully explains the complex processes that govern how knowledge moves into action in clinical environments.36 In fact, studies typically show that mathematic models based on these theories explain a small percentage of the variation in behavior.37, 38 So although conceptual frameworks or theories can provide guideposts on how to approach KT, a strong

The action cycle: how to approach knowledge translation process

Take time to deliberate, but when the time for action has arrived, stop thinking and go in.

—Napoleon Bonaparte, French general and politician (1769–1821)

The process through which knowledge becomes actionable is, by nature, one that involves local contextualization, management, and ongoing support, which can be challenging for the surgeon or therapist and often requires a broader level of collaboration than is required for the management of individual patients. Various approaches have been

Promoting action on research implementation in a health services framework

A framework entitled Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) was developed to represent the complexity of change processes involved in implementing EBP.45, 46 Successful research implementation is considered to be a function of the relationships among evidence, context, and facilitation (Fig. 3). Successful implementation is more likely if research evidence is clear and of high quality. However, the framework also emphasizes the importance of using clinical

Knowledge translation interventions

Various specific KT interventions can be used to increase awareness of a problem, develop useable/actionable forms of evidence, inform end users about the evidence, and promote change in practice. Literature synthesis is one form of KT and is partially addressed in other articles in this issue (eg, systematic reviews). Thus, the authors highlight other KT interventions that are meant to promote change in clinical practice.

An important source of evidence on the effectiveness of KT interventions

Key messages

Knowledge, if it does not determine action, is dead to us.

—Plotinus, Roman philosopher (205 ad–270 ad)

The key messages of this article may be summarized as follows. Additional tools are available in Appendix 1.

  • 1.

    The benefits of EBP depend on KT, moving evidence into practice.

  • 2.

    KT should be embedded in the creation of knowledge and drive new knowledge inquiry.

  • 3.

    KT should consider and apply theory that informs our understanding of how systems and individuals change and use knowledge.

  • 4.

    KT must capture the

References (97)

  • I. Ajzen

    The theory of planned behavior

    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process

    (1991)
  • D. Bonetti et al.

    Applying psychological theory to evidence-based clinical practice: identifying factors predictive of taking intra-oral radiographs

    Soc Sci Med

    (2006)
  • M. Newman et al.

    Barriers to evidence-based practice

    Intensive Crit Care Nurs

    (1998)
  • M. Ashe et al.

    Wristwatch-distal radial fracture as a marker for osteoporosis investigation: a controlled trial of patient education and a physician alerting system

    J Hand Ther

    (2004)
  • J.C. MacDermid

    The quality of clinical practice guidelines in hand therapy

    J Hand Ther

    (2004)
  • R. Foy et al.

    Attributes of clinical recommendations that influence change in practice following audit and feedback

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (2002)
  • J.J. Perry et al.

    Impact of clinical decision rules on clinical care of traumatic injuries to the foot and ankle, knee, cervical spine, and head

    Injury

    (2006)
  • I.G. Stiell et al.

    Methodologic standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1999)
  • A.K. Alderman et al.

    The rheumatoid hand: a predictable disease with unpredictable surgical practice patterns

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2002)
  • A.K. Alderman et al.

    Surgical management of the rheumatoid hand: consensus and controversy among rheumatologists and hand surgeons

    J Rheumatol

    (2003)
  • K. Pettersson et al.

    NeuFlex compared with Sutter prostheses: a blind, prospective, randomised comparison of silastic metacarpophalangeal joint prostheses

    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg

    (2006)
  • K. Schmidt et al.

    Z Rheumatol

    (1997)
  • C.J. Sollerman et al.

    Polyurethane versus silicone for endoprosthetic replacement of the metacarpophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis

    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg

    (1996)
  • C. Healy et al.

    Practice patterns in flexor tendon repair

    Ir J Med Sci

    (2007)
  • J.C. MacDermid et al.

    Predictors of time lost from work following a distal radius fracture

    J Occup Rehabil

    (2007)
  • M.A. Schuster et al.

    How good is the quality of health care in the United States?

    Milbank Q

    (1998)
  • R. Mangione-Smith et al.

    The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States

    N Engl J Med

    (2007)
  • S.M. Asch et al.

    Who is at greatest risk for receiving poor-quality health care?

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • C.A. Estabrooks

    Mapping the research utilization field in nursing

    Can J Nurs Res

    (1999)
  • C.A. Estabrooks

    Translating research into practice: implications for organizations and administrators

    Can J Nurs Res

    (2003)
  • C.A. Estabrooks et al.

    A guide to knowledge translation theory

    J Contin Educ Health Prof

    (2006)
  • S. Bennett et al.

    Perceptions of evidence-based practice: a survey of Australian occupational therapists

    Aust Occ Ther J

    (2003)
  • A.E. Bialocerkowski et al.

    Application of current research evidence to clinical physiotherapy practice

    J Allied Health

    (2004)
  • A.M. Dysart et al.

    Factors related to evidence-based practice among U.S. occupational therapy clinicians

    Am J Occup Ther

    (2002)
  • K. Kamwendo

    What do Swedish physiotherapists feel about research? A survey of perceptions, attitudes, intentions and engagement

    Physiother Res Int

    (2002)
  • C.G. Maher et al.

    Challenges for evidence-based physical therapy: accessing and interpreting high-quality evidence on therapy

    Phys Ther

    (2004)
  • A. McCluskey

    Occupational therapists report on low level of knowledge, skill and involvement in evidence-based practice

    Aust Occ Ther J

    (2003)
  • S. Palfreyman et al.

    Comparing evidence-based practice of nurses and physiotherapists

    Br J Nurs

    (2003)
  • J.M. Young et al.

    Evidence-based medicine in general practice: beliefs and barriers among Australian GPs

    J Eval Clin Pract

    (2001)
  • E.M. Rogers

    Diffusion of innovation

    (1962)
  • T. Greenhalgh et al.

    Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations: a systematic literature review

    (2005)
  • I. Ajzen

    From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. Action-control: from cognition to behavior

    (1985)
  • O. Bhattacharyya et al.

    Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions: fine in theory, but evidence of effectiveness in practice is needed

    Implement Sci

    (2006)
  • G. Godin et al.

    Healthcare professionals' intentions and behaviours: a systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories

    Implement Sci

    (2008)
  • I.D. Graham et al.

    Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2007)
  • C.J. Dubouloz et al.

    Occupational therapists' perceptions of evidence-based practice

    Am J Occup Ther

    (1999)
  • D.U. Jette et al.

    Evidence-based practice: beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of physical therapists

    Phys Ther

    (2003)
  • A. Coomarasamy et al.

    A systematic review of postgraduate teaching in evidence-based medicine and critical appraisal

    Med Teach

    (2003)
  • Cited by (48)

    • From dental science to clinical practice: Knowledge translation and evidence-based dentistry principles

      2017, Saudi Dental Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Knowledge translation (KT) concerns the application of the best available evidence to benefit health and well-being. This is a substantive process that involves a range of stakeholders who interact within the healthcare system (Salbach, 2010; MacDermid and Graham, 2009; Hassan, 2013). Evidence-based dentistry (EBD), on the other hand, is the process of combining the best available scientific evidence and the clinical expertise of dentists with patient needs and preferences in order to serve as the foundation for clinical care (Niederman et al., 2011; Ismail et al., 2004).

    • Therapist's practice patterns for subsequent fall/osteoporotic fracture prevention for patients with a distal radius fracture

      2019, Journal of Hand Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, knowledge regarding SFOFP applicable to hand therapy practice is available.35,36,38-40,42 However, implementation of decision support tools is an important step for translating knowledge into the routine clinical practice of hand therapists who treat these fractures.43 In North America, most patients with DRF are treated by a registered physical therapist (PT), occupational therapist (OT), or certified hand therapist (CHT) after the injury.44,45

    • Hand therapists' attitudes, environmental supports, and self-efficacy regarding intimate partner violence in their practice

      2019, Journal of Hand Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, the institutions in which HTs work share some responsibility in preparing their staff to deal with IPV, including facilitating access to appropriate internal or external health or community agencies. From an implementation science perspective, a coordinated site-specific strategy is needed to address important contextual issues and foster linkages with local resources.32 The present study has several strengths.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funded by a New Investigator Award, Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

    View full text