European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
ReviewPrediction and prevention of the macrosomic fetus
Introduction
The large for gestational age fetus is predisposed to a variety of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes, largely accounted for by the excess risks associated with labour and delivery, including shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injury [1], [2]. Delivery of a large infant also significantly increases the risk of birth complications for the mother [3], [4]. In the neonatal period, macrosomic infants are predisposed to electrolyte and metabolic disturbances, such as hypoglycaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia and hypomagnesaemia [5]. In the long term, infants that are at the highest end of the distribution for weight or body mass index (BMI) are more likely than other infants to be obese in childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood [6], and are at risk of cardiovascular and metabolic complications later in life [7], [8].
Fetal macrosomia is varyingly defined as either an absolute birthweight greater than 4000 g, 4500 g or 5000 g, or as a customised birth weight centile of greater than the 90th, 95th or 97th percentile for the infant's gestational age. None of these terms discriminates the fetus of abnormal body composition from normal. Customised centiles based on individual fetal growth potential are recognised to increase the likelihood of differentiating between physiological and pathological growth [9]. Birth trauma rates for the macrosomic fetus appear to be more closely related to absolute birthweight rather than birth weight centile, though there is evidence for a strong correlation between fetal macrosomia with a short maternal stature and the likelihood of birth injury [10]. The metabolic consequences of macrosomia, however, are more likely to be secondary to pathological overgrowth and abnormal fat deposition in utero [11] than to either absolute birthweight or birthweight centile.
With over one billion adults in the world now overweight and more than 600 million clinically obese [12], methods to accurately predict and ultimately prevent fetal macrosomia are now essential to reduce this potential global health burden.
Section snippets
Prediction of fetal macrosomia
Prediction of fetal macrosomia is notoriously fraught with difficulties and calls into question policies of elective delivery for estimated fetal weight alone. Possible methods include identification of those at risk, clinical examination, ultrasound assessment and most recently the use of predictive biomarkers.
Prevention of fetal macrosomia
Despite the limitations of macrosomia prediction as outlined above, there is a clear need for effective and safe strategies to reduce the incidence in at-risk populations.
Maternal weight, gestational weight gain and glycaemic control are the risk factors for fetal macrosomia that are most amenable to intervention, and that should be targeted for the primary prevention of the implications of fetal macrosomia for pregnancy and beyond. Exercise, healthy diet and lifestyle modifications should be
Conclusion
In conclusion, the macrosomic infant poses significant challenges to obstetric care and can have potential implications for both mother and baby long after labour and delivery. Antenatal detection of the macrosomic fetus is inadequate but advances are being made, both in improvements to estimated fetal weight formulas and in first-trimester prediction. Maternal weight, gestational weight gain and glucose homeostasis are targets for primary prevention of fetal overgrowth and its implications.
References (82)
- et al.
Neonatal brachial plexus injury: comparison of incidence and antecedents between 2 decades
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2011) - et al.
Perinatal implications of shoulder dystocia
Obstet Gynecol
(1995) - et al.
Macrosomic births in the United States: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2003) - et al.
Maternal and infant complications in high and normal weight infants by method of delivery
Obstet Gynecol
(1998) - et al.
Infants of diabetic mothers
Pediatr Clin North Am
(2004) Prenatal origin of obesity and their complications: gestational diabetes, maternal overweight and the paradoxical effects of fetal growth restriction and macrosomia
Reprod Toxicol
(2011)- et al.
Is it time to revisit the Pedersen hypothesis in the face of the obesity epidemic?
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2011) - et al.
Estimating the relative contributions of maternal genetic, paternal genetic and intrauterine factors to offspring birth weight and head circumference
Early Hum Dev
(2010) - et al.
Fetal weight gain at term: linear with minimal dependence on maternal obesity
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1995) - et al.
Prepregnancy weight, weight gain, and birth weight
Am J Obstet Gynaecol
(1986)