Review
Prediction and prevention of the macrosomic fetus

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.03.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Fetal macrosomia is associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity. In the long term, infants who are large for gestational age are more likely than other infants to be obese in childhood, adolescence and early adulthood, and are inherently at higher risk of cardiovascular and metabolic complications in adulthood. With over one billion adults in the world now overweight and more than 600 million clinically obese, preventing the vicious cycle effect of fetal macrosomia and childhood obesity is an increasingly pertinent issue.

Fetal growth is determined by a complex interplay of various genetic and environmental influences. Consequently the prediction of pregnancies at risk of pathological overgrowth is difficult. Many risk factors for fetal macrosomia, such as maternal obesity and advanced maternal age, are also conversely associated with intrauterine growth restriction. Sonographic detection of fetal macrosomia is notoriously fraught with difficulties, with dozens of formulas for estimated fetal weight proposed but few with sufficient sensitivity to alter clinical practice. This calls into question policies of elective delivery based on projected estimated fetal weight cut-offs alone. More recently the identification of markers of fetal adiposity and maternal serum biomarkers are being investigated to improve the antenatal detection of the large for gestational age fetus.

Prevention of fetal macrosomia is entirely dependent upon correct identification of those at risk. Maternal weight, gestational weight gain and glycaemic control are the risk factors for fetal macrosomia that are most amenable to intervention, and have potential maternal health benefits beyond pregnancy and childbirth. The ideal method of optimising maternal weight and glucose homeostasis is yet to be elucidated, though a number of promising advances are recently being reported.

In this review we outline the contemporary evidence for the prediction and prevention of fetal macrosomia, which is indeed a contemporary dilemma.

Introduction

The large for gestational age fetus is predisposed to a variety of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes, largely accounted for by the excess risks associated with labour and delivery, including shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injury [1], [2]. Delivery of a large infant also significantly increases the risk of birth complications for the mother [3], [4]. In the neonatal period, macrosomic infants are predisposed to electrolyte and metabolic disturbances, such as hypoglycaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia and hypomagnesaemia [5]. In the long term, infants that are at the highest end of the distribution for weight or body mass index (BMI) are more likely than other infants to be obese in childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood [6], and are at risk of cardiovascular and metabolic complications later in life [7], [8].

Fetal macrosomia is varyingly defined as either an absolute birthweight greater than 4000 g, 4500 g or 5000 g, or as a customised birth weight centile of greater than the 90th, 95th or 97th percentile for the infant's gestational age. None of these terms discriminates the fetus of abnormal body composition from normal. Customised centiles based on individual fetal growth potential are recognised to increase the likelihood of differentiating between physiological and pathological growth [9]. Birth trauma rates for the macrosomic fetus appear to be more closely related to absolute birthweight rather than birth weight centile, though there is evidence for a strong correlation between fetal macrosomia with a short maternal stature and the likelihood of birth injury [10]. The metabolic consequences of macrosomia, however, are more likely to be secondary to pathological overgrowth and abnormal fat deposition in utero [11] than to either absolute birthweight or birthweight centile.

With over one billion adults in the world now overweight and more than 600 million clinically obese [12], methods to accurately predict and ultimately prevent fetal macrosomia are now essential to reduce this potential global health burden.

Section snippets

Prediction of fetal macrosomia

Prediction of fetal macrosomia is notoriously fraught with difficulties and calls into question policies of elective delivery for estimated fetal weight alone. Possible methods include identification of those at risk, clinical examination, ultrasound assessment and most recently the use of predictive biomarkers.

Prevention of fetal macrosomia

Despite the limitations of macrosomia prediction as outlined above, there is a clear need for effective and safe strategies to reduce the incidence in at-risk populations.

Maternal weight, gestational weight gain and glycaemic control are the risk factors for fetal macrosomia that are most amenable to intervention, and that should be targeted for the primary prevention of the implications of fetal macrosomia for pregnancy and beyond. Exercise, healthy diet and lifestyle modifications should be

Conclusion

In conclusion, the macrosomic infant poses significant challenges to obstetric care and can have potential implications for both mother and baby long after labour and delivery. Antenatal detection of the macrosomic fetus is inadequate but advances are being made, both in improvements to estimated fetal weight formulas and in first-trimester prediction. Maternal weight, gestational weight gain and glucose homeostasis are targets for primary prevention of fetal overgrowth and its implications.

References (82)

  • B.H. Frentzen et al.

    Maternal weight gain: effect on infant birth weight among overweight and average-weight low-income women

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1988)
  • D.M. Jensen et al.

    Pregnancy outcome and prepregnancy body mass index in 2459 glucose-tolerant Danish women

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2003)
  • A.T. Bianco et al.

    Pregnancy outcome and weight gain recommendations for the morbidly obese woman

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1998)
  • W.E. Brenner et al.

    A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1976)
  • O. Gonen et al.

    Induction of labour versus expectant management in macrosomia: a randomized study

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1997)
  • R.G. Moses et al.

    Effect of a low-glycemic-index diet during pregnancy on obstetric outcomes

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2006)
  • J.M. Walsh et al.

    The association of maternal and fetal glucose homeostasis with fetal adiposity and birthweight

    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

    (2011)
  • M.H. Hall et al.

    Is routine antenatal care worth while?

    Lancet

    (1980)
  • G. Noumi et al.

    Clinical and sonographic estimation of fetal weight performed during labour by residents

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2005)
  • M. Hall et al.

    Is routine antenatal care worthwhile?

    Lancet

    (1980)
  • J.M. Belizán et al.

    Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation by a simple clinical method: measurement of uterine height

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1978)
  • S.P. Chauhan et al.

    Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2005)
  • S.P. Chauhan et al.

    Antepartum detection of macrosomic fetus: clinical versus sonographic, including soft-tissue measurements

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2000)
  • M.F. Higgins et al.

    Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness in diabetic pregnancy

    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

    (2008)
  • P.M. Catalano et al.

    Increased fetal adiposity: a very sensitive marker of abnormal in utero development

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2003)
  • F.F. Lauszus et al.

    Macrosomia associated with maternal serum insulin-like growth factor-I and -II in diabetic pregnancy

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2001)
  • K.R. Goetzinger et al.

    The efficiency of first-trimester serum analytes and maternal characteristics in predicting fetal growth disorders

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2009)
  • J.M. Walsh et al.

    Prevalence of physical activity among healthy pregnant women in Ireland

    Int J Gynaecol Obstet

    (2011)
  • C.J. Glueck et al.

    Metformin therapy throughout pregnancy reduces the development of gestational diabetes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

    Fertil Steril

    (2002)
  • D.J. Jenkins et al.

    Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1981)
  • C.M. Boney et al.

    Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus

    Pediatrics

    (2005)
  • G.M. Hermann et al.

    Neonatal macrosomia is an independent risk factor for adult metabolic syndrome

    Neonatology

    (2010)
  • J. Gardosi et al.

    The customised growth potential: an international research tool to study the epidemiology of fetal growth

    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol

    (2011)
  • S. Gudmundsson et al.

    Correlation of birth injury with maternal height and birthweight

    BJOG

    (2005)
  • WHO

    Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic.

    (2000)
  • W.N. Spellacy et al.

    Macrosomia – maternal characteristics and infant complications

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1985)
  • C.A. Walsh et al.

    Recurrence of fetal macrosomia in non-diabetic pregnancies

    J Obstet Gynaecol

    (2007)
  • R. Mahony et al.

    Outcome of second delivery after prior macrosomic infant in women with normal glucose tolerance

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2006)
  • J.W. Johnson et al.

    Excessive maternal weight and pregnancy outcome

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1992)
  • D.S. Seidman et al.

    The effect of maternal weight gain in pregnancy on birth weight

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1989)
  • S. Selvin et al.

    Analysing the relationship between maternal weight gain and birthweight: exploration of four statistical issues

    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol

    (1996)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text