Elsevier

Early Human Development

Volume 83, Issue 12, December 2007, Pages 813-818
Early Human Development

Assessing the impact of preterm nutrition

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.09.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Growth is the traditional means of assessing the impact of newborn nutrition. We argue that this approach is flawed as the optimum pattern of postnatal growth after extremely preterm birth is unknown and both growth restraint and growth acceleration are associated with beneficial as well as adverse outcomes. Clinical trials examining nutritional regimens should be designed to achieve specific patterns of postnatal growth. Clinical practice should include the systematic capture of neonatal nutritional intake. As the ultimate goals are adult health and wellbeing, long-term follow-up is essential.

Introduction

Nutritional support for extremely preterm infants has always been problematic. The practical and clinical complexities of providing intensive care and delivering enteral and parenteral nutrition have been sufficiently challenging to have justified a focus on short-term goals. But over the last decades illness severity has reduced, physiological stability has improved and the likelihood of survival to adult life has increased. It is time to consider long-term goals.

By the time a preterm infant reaches term equivalent age clear differences in brain and somatic development are apparent in comparison to healthy term-born counterparts. Many of these differences are now known to persist and alter trajectories of normal development for life. The nutritional support of the preterm infant is likely to be a key determinant in establishing this altered phenotype.

How should the success of nutritional support for the preterm infant be assessed? This review will discuss the differences that exist between the preterm infant at term age and beyond in comparison to healthy term-born infants, the evidence demonstrating the impact of early nutrition on trajectories of development, the conundrums faced by neonatologists when considering nutritional support, and the outcomes that might best be used to assess nutritional stratagems.

Section snippets

Somatic growth

Growth, particularly weight gain has traditionally been the favoured means of assessing the adequacy of nutritional support. But what is optimal growth for preterm babies? Preterm birth is the end result of a compromised pregnancy. Thus it is not surprising that an infant born preterm usually weighs less than a fetus remaining in utero at equivalent gestational age, indicating that some degree of deceleration in intrauterine growth has occurred. At 25–26 weeks gestation, newborn weights are

Cardiovascular outcomes

The now landmark epidemiological observations of Barker demonstrating an association between birth size and adult coronary vascular disease [17] have been extended and amplified though data published to date still present an inconsistent picture. It has been suggested that individuals of low birth weight who show rapid weight gain in infancy have the highest risk of adult cardiovascular morbidity though these researchers found no adverse effect on vascular function (measured by flow mediated

Renal function

Aberrant renal development is a further contributor to the adult preterm phenotype. Preterm infants are at risk of exposure to many nephrotoxic insults but reduced nephron number related to poor early nutrition followed by hyperfiltration, exacerbated by a high protein intake has been suggested as an additional determinant of preterm and intrauterine growth restriction associated hypertension [22]. However reduced total renal mass, secondary to congenital unilateral kidney or nephrectomy does

Metabolic outcomes

Reduced insulin sensitivity in infants born preterm (< 32 weeks gestation) has been demonstrated at 4–10 years [55] and 18–27 years of age [23]. In the former study no association was demonstrated between neonatal macronutrient intakes and insulin sensitivity. However there was a significant negative association between rapid growth in infancy and insulin sensitivity. In the latter study preterm adults had higher 2-hour glucose, fasting insulin and 2-hour insulin concentrations. We have found

Body composition

Weight gain is a poor indicator of the success of preterm nutrition as this provides no insight into body composition. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows direct assessment of adipose tissue (AT) content and it able to quantify individual AT depots [24]. Using whole body MR imaging, we have shown that there is aberrant deposition of AT, with an excess of intra-abdominal AT, in preterm infants by the age of term and reduced lean body mass in comparison to their term-born counterparts [25].

Brain growth and development

The preterm infant is born during a critical period for brain growth. Processes such as cellular migration, cellular differentiation, synaptogenesis, myelination, neurogenesis and development of neurotransmitter pathways may all be susceptible to nutritional deprivation during this period. Studies of perinatal protein undernutrition in rats consistently demonstrate a reduction in brain weight [28], a reduction in dendritic spine density in different neuronal populations [29], [30], [31] and

Preterm nutrition

It has long been argued and is currently widely accepted that adequate nutrition of the preterm infant equates with achieving the equivalent of third trimester intrauterine weight gain (14–18 g/kg/day) and nutrient accretion (1.8–2 g/kg/day of protein and 1.4–1.9 g/kg/day of fat). An obvious limitation of this strategy is that data on human fetal body composition are derived mainly from stillborn fetuses [46]. Ehrenkranz et al. have provided a comprehensive assessment of longitudinal postnatal

Conclusions and future directions

The question for the neonatal clinician is clear: what outcome or outcomes best represent the impact of preterm nutrition? We suggest that it is time for a shift in emphasis when evaluating preterm nutrition, away from short-term growth.

The use of growth as the sole or principal outcome measure to assess preterm nutrition is flawed as we do not know what represents optimal growth. We only know that there are problems at both ends of the spectrum, with poor and rapid early growth associated with

References (58)

  • N. Bennis-Taleb et al.

    A low-protein diet during gestation affects brain development and alters permanently cerebral cortex blood vessels in rat offspring

    Nutr Neurosci

    (1999)
  • J. Peterson et al.

    Subnormal head circumference in very low birth weight children: neonatal correlates and school-age consequences

    Early Hum Dev

    (2006)
  • J.W. Anderson et al.

    Breast-feeding and cognitive development: a meta-analysis

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1999)
  • C. Malamateniou et al.

    The effect of preterm birth on neonatal cerebral vasculature studied with magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T

    Neuroimage

    (2006)
  • M. Ajayi-Obe et al.

    Reduced development of cerebral cortex in extremely preterm infants

    Lancet

    (2000)
  • R.A. Ehrenkranz

    Early, aggressive nutritional management for very low birth weight infants: what is the evidence?

    Semin Perinatol

    (2007)
  • H.I. Goldman et al.

    Clinical effects of two different levels of protein intake on low-birth-weight infants

    J Pediatr

    (1969)
  • R.A. Ehrenkranz et al.

    Longitudinal growth of hospitalized very low birth weight infants

    Pediatrics

    (1999)
  • R.H. Clark et al.

    Extrauterine growth restriction remains a serious problem in prematurely born neonates

    Pediatrics

    (2003)
  • J. Cockerill et al.

    Accelerated postnatal head growth follows preterm birth

    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed

    (2006)
  • M. Hack et al.

    Growth of very low birth weight infants to age 20 years

    Pediatrics

    (2003)
  • M.A. Bracewell et al.

    The EPICure study: growth and blood pressure at 6 years of age following extremely preterm birth

    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed

    (2007)
  • K.K.L. Ong et al.

    Association between postnatal catch-up growth and obesity in childhood: prospective cohort study

    BMJ

    (2000)
  • A. Singhal et al.

    Promotion of faster weight gain in infants born small for gestational age: is there an adverse effect on later blood pressure?

    Circulation

    (2007)
  • J.G. Eriksson et al.

    Early growth and coronary heart disease in later life: longitudinal study

    BMJ

    (2001)
  • S.E. Ozanne et al.

    Lifespan: catch-up growth and obesity in male mice

    Nature

    (2004)
  • J.K. Cleal et al.

    Mismatched pre-and postnatal nutrition leads to cardiovascular dysfunction and altered renal function in adulthood

    PNAS

    (2007)
  • M.H. Vickers et al.

    Neonatal leptin treatment reverses developmental programming

    Endocrinology

    (2005)
  • ...
  • Cited by (26)

    • Growth Outcomes of Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Long-term Considerations

      2012, Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, given the multiple factors that impact growth, it is unclear at this time whether a reduction in EUGR through improvements in nutritional practices will significantly impact neurodevelopmental outcomes.4 Currently, there is a lack of evidence derived from randomized clinical trials to support these relationships.55 The minimal evidence available suggests that providing enhanced nutritional intake does not necessarily translate into significant improvements in neurodevelopment.23,58

    • Body composition in newborn infants: 5-year experience in an Italian neonatal intensive care unit

      2012, Early Human Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, the preterm infant, as he/she switches from intrauterine to extrauterine life, has to maintain his/her own thermoregulation, fluid balance, and breathing as well as deal with an adverse extrauterine environment (i.e. the neonatal intensive care unit), even in the absence of major clinical problems. Although nutrition is reported to explain only 50% of the variance in early postnatal growth [8], several differences between fetal and postnatal nutrition could partly explain the difficulty of preterm infants in accomplishing a growth and body composition outside the uterus comparable to intrauterine growth. Early and aggressive nutritional management of very preterm infants has been recommended in order to limit the degree of extrauterine growth retardation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text