Elsevier

Contraception

Volume 86, Issue 6, December 2012, Pages 716-724
Contraception

Original research article
A randomized controlled study of two educational interventions on adherence with oral contraceptives and condoms

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of two different interventions on oral contraception (OC) adherence and condom use.

Study Design

A total of 1,155 women 16–24 years of age requesting OC were randomized to receive either face-to-face behavioral counseling and education at their baseline clinic visit (C group; n= 383) or this same intervention followed by monthly phone calls for 6 months (C+P group; n= 384) or standard care (S group; n= 388). Phone interviews at 3, 6 and 12 months after the initial visit as well as a medical record review assessed OC continuation, condom use and several other secondary and clinically meaningful outcomes such as pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates and correct use of pills.

Results

The interventions did not have a significant effect on OC continuation after 3 (C+P: 58%; C: 50%; S: 55%), 6 (39%; 32%; 37%) or 12 months (20%; 18%; 20%) (p>.05). Condom use at last sexual intercourse did not differ by intervention methods (p>.05). Moreover, no effect was observed on pregnancy [S=48 (12.4%), C = 63 (16.5%), C+P=52 (13.5%); p=.22] and STI [S=18 (4.6%), C=12 (3.1%), C+P=13 (3.4%); p=.50] rates, and mean number of correctly used pill packs (p=.06). However, those randomized to C+P were more likely than C and S patients to identify a cue and report that the cue worked as a reminder to take their OC on time based on 3 and 6 months follow-up information (p<.01 for all relationships).

Conclusions

Neither intervention in this study improved OC adherence among young women.

Introduction

Many young women experience difficulty using oral contraception (OC) consistently or correctly. Moreover, among young users, almost half discontinue its use within 6 months of obtaining a prescription [1], [2]. These young women are at high risk of an unintended pregnancy because they often fail to use another contraceptive method after discontinuing their birth control pills. In one study of women, 33% of those 13–19 years of age and 18% of 20–22-year olds reported that they did not use any contraception for at least 1 month after stopping their birth control pills, even though they did not wish to become pregnant [3].

Further compounding the problem is that among those who continue to use OC for at least 6 months, a large proportion fail to take it correctly. In one nationwide study of 943 women (mean age 25 years), 47% of OC users missed ≥ 1 pill per cycle and 22% missed ≥ 2. Increased odds of missing ≥ 2 pills was associated with lacking an established pill-taking routine, not reading or understanding the informational material accompanying the pill package, or experiencing side effects [4]. Difficulty with adherence is even more pronounced among high school and college age women. In one study, only 52% of university students who were prescribed OC took all their active birth control pills during the first 3 months [5]. A prior study on 211 teens seen at our institution reported that nearly 60% of OC users missed one or more pills within the last 3 months and 10% missed at least three pills in the last cycle [1].

From these data, it is apparent that interventions must be developed to improve the consistency and correctness of OC use among young women. Suggestions on how to address this problem were made in 2003 by an interdisciplinary group of researchers and service providers, following a National Institutes of Health-funded meeting on this topic [6]. They noted that the current system used by most clinics of providing oral contraception at a single brief visit is not effective as providers can spend only a few minutes on education [7], which is not sufficient to meet the needs of younger women. This problem is compounded by the fact that the next follow-up visit does not occur until several months later. To address this, they suggested adding health educators to clinic staff or phone call interactions between visits [6]. Others have suggested that providers give OC users a toll-free number they could call if they missed pills, experienced breakthrough bleeding, or were confused about when to start a new package [8].

An examination of the literature, however, demonstrates that few studies have actually evaluated the effectiveness of additional educational or behavioral counseling on contraceptive adherence. Furthermore, most of those that have been published are limited in their usefulness because they did not measure clinically meaningful outcomes, such as unintended pregnancy rates [9], [10], [11]. A recent Cochrane review based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) also emphasized the need for a high quality RCT as the RCTs included in the review had several limitations [12]. The purpose of the present study was to fill this gap in knowledge by testing two comprehensive educational and behavioral interventions designed to increase contraceptive adherence among young low income women. Furthermore, the efficacy of these interventions in increasing dual method use (joint use of a condom for protection from STIs and a highly effective contraceptive method) and decreasing rates of STI and unintended pregnancy was assessed.

Section snippets

Methods

A randomized, controlled trial was conducted to examine the effect of clinic-based intervention (C) and a clinic-based plus telephone (C+P) intervention on contraceptive adherence among young women initiating use of OC at one of five publicly funded reproductive health clinics in Southeast Texas. These clinics serve low income women, of which 80% have an annual income below US $30,000/year. After obtaining approval from the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) Institutional Review Board,

Results

A total of 20,263 women were approached to determine if they were eligible for this study, of which 1,638 women were eligible (Fig. 1). The most common reasons for ineligibility were that they did not want to use OC (57.2%), were already using OC (9.3%), had previously used OC for > 1 month (22.7%) or planned to become pregnant within 12 months (3.2%). Of those eligible, 483 (30%) declined to participate, usually due to time constraints that day. Thus, 1155 women met all inclusion/exclusion

Discussion

In this study, we observed that women who received additional education on how to use OC were no more likely than those randomized to standard care to remain on this method or to do so correctly. This suggests that merely adding additional educational time to the clinic visit or immediately afterwards by telephone may not be sufficient to increase adherence with OC use among young, low income women at high risk of unintended pregnancy. These findings agree with two studies published in 2010 [10]

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by an award from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration (R40MC06634, Berenson) and a midcareer investigator award in patient-oriented research (K24HD043659, Berenson), from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the MCHB, HRSA, NICHD or the

References (28)

  • Oakley D, Potter L, de Leon-Wong E, Visness C. Oral contraceptive use and protective behavior after missed pills. Fam...
  • D. Kalmuss et al.

    Preventing sexual risk behaviors and pregnancy among teenagers: linking research and programs

    Perspect Sex Reprod Health

    (2003)
  • M.Y. Hou et al.

    Using daily text-message reminders to improve adherence with oral contraceptives: a randomized controlled trial

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2010)
  • M.S. Jay et al.

    Effect of peer counselors on adolescent compliance in use of oral contraceptives

    Pediatrics

    (1984)
  • Cited by (55)

    • Effects of mHealth intervention on sexual and reproductive health in emerging adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

      2021, International Journal of Nursing Studies
      Citation Excerpt :

      Eleven studies reported outcomes with regard to the use of contraception (Berenson and Rahman, 2012; Castaño et al., 2012; Gilliam et al., 2014; Hebert et al., 2018; Lim et al., 2012; McCarthy et al., 2018; McCarthy et al., 2019; Nielsen et al., 2019; Rokicki et al., 2017; Suffoletto et al., 2013; Trent et al., 2019). Because Berenson and Rahman (2012) used two contraceptive methods as the outcome variable, we included two results of Berenson and Rahman (2012) in this meta-analysis. Likewise, Rokicki et al. (2017) included two mHealth intervention groups (unidirectional intervention, interactive intervention) in a 3-arm study design.

    • “The use of educational strategies for promotion of knowledge, attitudes and contraceptive practices among teenagers – A randomized clinical trial”

      2019, Nurse Education Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare these two educational interventions, one based on the methodology of problematizing and the other based on the pedagogy of transmission, in order to identify the effect they produce on the KAP of adolescents, in relation to the pill and the condom. These contraceptive methods were chosen because they are the ones most used by teenagers, including Brazilian ones, theirs being the most vulnerable age range with regard to contraceptive practices (Crosby and Salazar, 2015; Berenson and Rahman, 2012). This was a longitudinal, randomized clinical trial type of intervention study, in which two educational strategies were compared, developed in three stages, during five months of follow-up; it was conducted with high school students of a city in the state of São Paulo, in which two different educational strategies were used for promotion of the KAP of the use of the pill and condoms among teenagers: one based on the methodology of problematization (Bordenave and Pereira, 1989), named Problematization Group (PG) and another based on the pedagogy of transmission (Cyrino and Toralles-Pereira, 2004), named Transmission Group (TG).

    • Contraceptive Counseling in Clinical Settings: An Updated Systematic Review

      2018, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several studies also used instruments with psychometric evidence of validity or reliability to measure constructs of interest,15,26,36 and at least three measured pregnancy by using urine tests versus self-report.24,32 Several studies directly acknowledged training study staff,16,18,22,24–29,38,42 and six reported using standardized provider tools to improve intervention implementation.12,15,20,22,28,30 Overall, evidence supports the utility of contraceptive counseling, in general, and specific interventions or aspects of counseling to impact reproductive health outcomes and client experiences.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00584038.

    View full text