Elsevier

Clinical Biochemistry

Volume 44, Issue 12, August 2011, Pages 1021-1024
Clinical Biochemistry

High sensitivity troponin T concentrations in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: A prospective cohort study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.05.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the proportion of noncardiac surgery patients exceeding the published 99th percentile or change criteria with the high sensitivity Troponin T (hs-TnT) assay.

Design and methods

We measured hs-TnT preoperatively and postoperatively on days 1, 2 and 3 in 325 adults.

Results

Postoperatively 45% (95% CI: 39–50%) of patients had hs-TnT  14 ng/L and 22% (95% CI:17–26%) had an elevation (≥ 14 ng/L) and change (> 85%) in hs-TnT.

Conclusion

Further research is needed to inform the optimal hs-TnT threshold and change in this setting.

Introduction

Noncardiac surgery has made substantial advances in treating diseases and improving patients' quality of life; however, it is also associated with major vascular complications [1]. The Vascular events In noncardiac Surgery patIents cOhort evaluation (i.e., VISION) Study is a large (i.e., 40,000 patient) international prospective cohort study evaluating major vascular complications in a representative sample of patients  45 years of age undergoing noncardiac surgery. At the beginning of the study, all sites were using the 4th generation troponin T (hence referred to as TnT) assay, but with the 5th generation high sensitivity TnT (hence referred to as hs-TnT) assay gaining regulatory approval there will be a shift to using hs-TnT in this population. The characteristics of the hs-TnT assay in this population are unknown.

Recent publications have reported the analytical characteristics of hs-TnT assay with respect to the 99th percentile (≥ 14 ng/L) in a healthy population, the reference change values (RCVs; > 85%), and the optimal change criteria to identify non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI; > 242%) [2], [3], [4]. The PEACE Study demonstrated that 11% of patients with stable coronary artery disease exceeded an hs-TnT assay value  14 ng/L and that this value was an independent predictor of cardiovascular death [5]. Questions persist, however, regarding whether the reference interval from a healthy population should be applied to all patient populations in all settings [6]. We sought to determine the prevalence of patients exceeding the published 99th percentile versus the derived reference intervals from the preoperative samples from a substudy of VISION patients. We also assessed the different change criteria (85% versus 242%).

Section snippets

Study population

The VISION Bio-bank Study is a substudy of VISION, and includes a prospective sample of VISION patients who are ≥ 45 years of age, undergoing elective or emergent noncardiac surgery requiring overnight hospital admission, and receiving a general or regional anesthetic. Recruitment into the VISION Bio-bank Study has occurred at the following three Canadian hospitals: the Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Saint Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, and Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre,

Results

The mean (SD) patient age was 65 (11) years, approximately half were female, and there was representation of all major surgical interventions, Table 1. The Revised Cardiac Risk Index suggested that the majority of participants were considered low-risk (i.e., scores of 0 or 1) for a major perioperative vascular complication.

The hs-TnT concentrations were higher postoperatively (days 1, 2, 3) as compared to the preoperative concentrations (Table 1). Preoperatively, 21% (95% CI: 17–25%) of the

Discussion

Our study demonstrates that patients undergoing noncardiac surgery represent a population with significant hs-TnT elevations. Using the published 99th percentile of ≥ 14 ng/L, one in five adults exceeded this threshold prior to surgery. This positive rate increased postoperatively with over 40% of subjects having a postoperative hs-TnT concentration  14 ng/L. Some authors advocate the need for a change in concentration beyond surpassing a hs-TnT threshold. When both of these criteria are employed

Acknowledgments

Funding and support for this study was obtained via grants from the CANadian Network and Centre for Trials Internationally (CANNeCTIN), Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, Diagnostic Services of Manitoba, and Roche Diagnostics

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (76)

  • Identification of myocardial injury using perioperative troponin surveillance in major noncardiac surgery and net benefit over the Revised Cardiac Risk Index

    2022, British Journal of Anaesthesia
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although there is a general consensus favouring the high-sensitivity troponin assays, various definitions and cut-off values have been applied in previous studies. Elevations in preoperative cTns also occur commonly1–5,8,12 and may portend significant morbidity and mortality postoperatively.3,8,12–17 This raises concerns for preoperative risk stratification and a potential dilemma for the management of these patients before surgery.

  • Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018)

    2018, Global Heart
    Citation Excerpt :

    Knowledge about hs-cTn values at baseline can help to identify patients having chronic cTn elevation before surgery, as well as those at increased risk during and after the procedure [79,80]. Measurement of hs-cTn in post-operative samples reveals that as many as 35% of patients have levels above the 99th percentile URL, and 17% have an elevation and a rising pattern of values indicative of evolving myocardial injury [81]. Those with a rising pattern of elevated hs-cTn values are at particular risk; the greater the rise, the greater the risk [82,83].

  • Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018)

    2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
View all citing articles on Scopus

Sources of support: grants from the CANadian Network and Centre for Trials Internationally (CANNeCTIN), Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, Diagnostic Services of Manitoba, and Roche Diagnostics.

View full text