Child sexual abuse is largely hidden from the adult society: An epidemiological study of adolescents’ disclosures☆
Introduction
Most studies of disclosure of sexual abuse during childhood either focus on children's disclosure in a professional setting such as in a forensic or clinical interview (Berliner & Conte, 1995; Bradley & Wood, 1996; DeVoe & Faller, 1999; Jensen, Gulbrandsen, Mossige, Reichelt, & Tjersland, 2005; Sjöberg & Lindblad, 2002; Sorensen & Snow, 1991; Svedin & Back, 2003) or on population-based retrospective reports from adults (Arata, 1998, Collings, 1995; Finkelhor, Hotaling, Lewis, & Smith, 1990; Hanson, Resnick, Saunders, Kilpatrick, & Best, 1999; Roesler, 1994, Ruggiero et al., 2004, Smith et al., 2000; Somer & Szwarcberg, 2001; Tang, 2002).
An advantage of population-based studies is that they can collect information even from participants who never disclosed their experience of sexual abuse prior to their participation in the study and who have never been in contact with the professional system. This may be of great interest for public health policy and for support services intended for sexually abused persons. The disclosure rates in the above named retrospective studies with adults are between 31% and 41% for disclosure during childhood and between 58 and 72% for lifetime disclosure. Peer abuse (peer defined as a person not more than five years older than the victim) is included in some of these studies, while it is not specified in other studies and excluded in one (Arata, 1998).
Although it can be expected that there is less recall bias in adolescent retrospective studies since the self-reported sexual abuse is closer in time there are surprisingly few retrospective studies with adolescent participants. It is difficult to compare the few available studies since, for example, Kogan (2004) only included girls, Edgardh and Ormstad (2000) included both boys and girls while others do not present separate results for boys and girls (Fergusson, Lynskey, & Horwood, 1996; Helweg-Larsen & Larsen, 2006; Kellogg & Huston, 1995). The lowest disclosure rate (56%) is reported for boys (Edgardh & Ormstad, 2000) while the other studies present disclosure rates ranging between 74% and 87%. All adolescent studies included both adult and peer abuse.
Disclosing adolescents usually talk to friends or parents (Edgardh & Ormstad, 2000; Fergusson et al., 1996; Kellogg & Huston, 1995). Friends as recipients of disclosure are of increasing importance for adolescents while younger children disclose more often to an adult (Kogan, 2004). Few disclosing adolescents, between 3% and 13%, had talked to an adult professional (Edgardh & Ormstad, 2000; Kellogg & Huston, 1995; Kogan, 2004). This is in line with findings from retrospective studies with adults (Arata, 1998, Collings, 1995, Hanson et al., 1999, Smith et al., 2000, Tang, 2002).
Few retrospective studies of adolescents have analyzed variables other than disclosure rates and recipients of disclosure. Kogan (2004) investigated how survivor characteristics, abuse characteristics and family context attributes were related to the timing and the recipient of disclosure. The identity of the recipient of the disclosure (adult, peer only, none) was related to age of onset, penetration, fear for one's life during the abuse, injury during the abuse, family structure, and the age differential between the victim and the perpetrator while the timing of disclosure was related to age of onset, a known perpetrator, a familial relationship with the perpetrator, and a history of drug abuse in the household. The disclosure recipient or disclosure timing were not associated with race/ethnicity, parental education, household income and household alcohol abuse. Kellogg and Huston (1995) studied the reasons for disclosure or non-disclosure. In general, fear and embarrassment were the most common reasons for delay or non-disclosure, but there were also differences between ethnic groups.
Disclosure of sexual abuse is usually regarded as beneficial to the exposed child (Arata, 1998; Paine & Hansen, 2002). However, previous studies with children in forensic samples (Elliott & Briere, 1994; Nagel, Putnam, Noll, & Tricket, 1997), undergraduate female students (Sinclair & Gold, 1997) and adult women (Ruggiero et al., 2004) have not shown any direct link between disclosure and a positive mental health outcome. Association between current perceived mental health and disclosure and the role of general parental support for young persons’ disclosure has not yet, to our knowledge, been investigated in population-based studies with adolescents.
Studies about the role of abuse-specific parental support in relation to disclosure have shown that the child's willingness to disclose in a professional context increased when the mother was supportive and believed in the child's disclosure (Elliott & Briere, 1994; Lawson & Chaffin, 1992). General parental support and care seem to be a good predictor for recovery after sexual abuse (Lynskey & Fergusson, 1997; Spaccarelli & Kim, 1995). Sinclair and Gold (1997) found that general parental support was not related to withholding disclosure from others, but it is unclear if parental support at the time of the study or during childhood was measured.
Previous studies of adolescents about disclosure of sexual abuse include female-only samples or mixed samples that either include small groups of boys who reported sexual abuse or that do not show separate results for boys or girls. As group differences between boys and girls concerning prevalence and sexual abuse characteristics are well-documented (Watkins & Bentovim, 1992), it can be expected that there are differences concerning disclosure rates, disclosure patterns and predictors for disclosure or non-disclosure, too. There is a need for studies that include and show sufficient numbers of both boys and girls who report sexual abuse.
This study is intended to contribute data about disclosure of sexual abuse from a large population-based sample of adolescents with self-reported experiences of child sexual abuse including peer abuse. The specific aims of this study were
- •
to investigate disclosure rates and disclosure patterns associated with recipients of disclosure, abuse characteristics, socio-demographic variables, perception of parents when growing up and current perceived mental health, separate for boys and girls,
- •
to examine predictors of non-disclosure, separate for boys and girls.
No specific hypotheses are stated as the approach is basically exploratory. All variables in the analysis are expected to be associated with disclosure.
Section snippets
Participants
This study was a part of the Swedish base for comparative studies under the aegis of the Baltic Sea Regional Study on Adolescent Sexuality and the aim was to obtain a representative sample of high school seniors (3rd year high school students) in each country. Following the common guidelines the capital (Stockholm), one large port (Malmö) and some smaller cities (Luleå, Haparanda and Falköping) were chosen in Sweden. All 3rd year students (high school seniors) in all high schools in these
Sexual abuse rates
Of the total sample of 2,324 girls and 2,015 boys, 65% of the girls and 23% of the boys reported some form of sexual abuse experience. Of the girls who reported experiences of sexual abuse, 10.0% reported non-contact abuse, 69.2% contact abuse without penetration and 20.8% penetrating abuse. Non-contact abuse was reported by 18.4% of the boys who reported sexual abuse, while 57.3% reported contact abuse and 24.3% penetrating abuse (Table 1). Participants with experiences of different kinds of
Discussion
The aim of this study was to investigate disclosure rates and disclosure patterns and to examine predictors of non-disclosure in a sample of male and female adolescents with self-reported experiences of sexual abuse. The main results from this study may be summarized in six main findings.
Conclusion
The important message from this study is that sexual abuse is largely hidden from the adult society, especially for professionals and the legal system. Disclosing child sexual abuse is a complex process and when young persons disclose sexual abuse, friends seem to be the most important receivers of the information. The multiple logistic regression analysis shows that children's difficulties with disclosure are associated with both abuse factors such as severity and frequency, with the relation
References (51)
- et al.
The effects of disclosure and intervention on sexually abused children
Child Abuse & Neglect
(1995) - et al.
Typology and correlates of sexual abuse in children and youth: Multivariate analyses in a prevalence study in Geneva
Child Abuse & Neglect
(1999) - et al.
How do children tell? The disclosure process in child sexual abuse
Child Abuse & Neglect
(1996) The long-term effects of contact and noncontact forms of child sexual abuse in a sample of university men
Child Abuse & Neglect
(1995)- et al.
Childhood sexual abuse and psychiatric disorder in young adulthood. Part 1: The prevalence of sexual abuse and factors associated with sexual abuse
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
(1996) - et al.
Sexual abuse in a national survey of adult men and women: Prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors
Child Abuse & Neglect
(1990) - et al.
A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status
Social Science Research
(1992) - et al.
Factors related to the reporting of childhood rape
Child Abuse & Neglect
(1999) - et al.
See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil: Why do relatively few male victims of childhood sexual abuse receive help for abuse-related issues in adulthood?
Clinical Psychology Review
(1997) Disclosing unwanted sexual experiences: Results from a national sample of adolescent women
Child Abuse & Neglect
(2004)
Factors protecting against the development of adjustment difficulties in young adults exposed to childhood sexual abuse
Child Abuse & Neglect
Disclosure patterns of sexual abuse and psychological functioning at a 1-year follow-up
Child Abuse & Neglect
Factors influencing children to self-disclose sexual abuse
Clinical Psychology Review
Delay in disclosure of childhood rape: Results from a national survey
Child Abuse & Neglect
Resilience criteria and factors associated with resilience in sexually abused girls
Child Abuse & Neglect
Childhood experience of sexual abuse among Hong Kong Chinese college students
Child Abuse & Neglect
To tell or not to tell: Current functioning of child sexual abuse survivors who disclosed their victimization
Child Maltreatment
The victim's experience: Pathways to disclosure
Psychotherapy: Theory/Research/Practice/Training
The men and the boys
SCL-90. Administration, scoring & procedures manual – I for the R(evised) version
The characteristics of disclosure among children who may have been sexually abused
Child Maltreatment
Young men surviving child sexual abuse. Research stories and lessons for therapeutic practice
Prevalence and characteristics of sexual abuse in a national sample of Swedish seventeen-year-old boys and girls
Acta Paediatrica
Forensic sexual abuse evaluations of older children: Disclosures and symptomatology
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Cited by (264)
Factors related to delayed disclosure among victims of child sexual abuse in Singapore
2024, Child Abuse and NeglectA systematic review of factors associated with disclosure of child sexual abuse
2024, Child Abuse and NeglectChildren's perspectives on family members’ needs and support after child sexual abuse
2023, Children and Youth Services ReviewA current view on the neglected topic of male child sexual abuse in the context of literature
2024, Child Abuse ReviewChild abuse and neglect and associated mental health outcomes: a large, population-based survey among children and adolescents from Jamaica and Uganda
2024, Mental Health and Social Inclusion
- ☆
The authors would like to acknowledge the Committee into knowledge concerning sexual exploitation of children in Sweden (S 2003:5) at the Swedish Social Ministry, the Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority in Sweden and Her Majesty Queen Silvia's Jubilee Foundation for their financial support to the project.