Systematic review and meta-analysisComparative Risk of Serious Infections With Biologic and/or Immunosuppressive Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Section snippets
Methods
This systematic review is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement and was conducted following an a priori established protocol.10
Results
From 11,947 unique studies identified using our search strategy, the full text of 115 studies were reviewed in detail, and eventually 15 studies were included in the quantitative analysis15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29; in addition, 3 studies comparing TNFi-based therapy vs chronic corticosteroids and non-TNFi biologics vs TNFi-based therapy were evaluated qualitatively.30, 31, 32 Figure 1 shows the study selection flowsheet. Of these 15 studies, 9 used administrative
Discussion
In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 cohort studies on the comparative risk of serious infections with TNFi, non-TNFi biologics, and immunosuppressive agents in patients with IBD, we made several key observations. First, combination therapy with TNFi + IS was associated only with a modestly higher risk (19%) of serious infections as compared with TNFi monotherapy. Second, TNFi monotherapy was associated with a 64% higher risk of serious infection as compared with immunosuppressive
Acknowledgments
The authors sincerely thank Kellee Kaulback, Medical Information Officer, Health Quality Ontario, for helping in the literature search for this technical review.
References (42)
- et al.
Annual burden and costs of hospitalization for high-need, high-cost patients with chronic gastrointestinal and liver diseases
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
(2018) - et al.
Biologic therapies and risk of infection and malignancy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
(2016) - et al.
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
Control Clin Trials
(1986) - et al.
Risk of serious and opportunistic infections associated with treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases
Gastroenterology
(2018) - et al.
Comparative effectiveness and safety of anti–tumor necrosis factor agents in biologic-naive patients with Crohn's disease
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
(2016) - et al.
Comparison of infliximab and adalimumab in biologic-naive patients with ulcerative colitis: a nationwide Danish cohort study
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
(2017) - et al.
Screening prior to biological therapy in Crohn's disease: adherence to guidelines and prevalence of infections. Results from a multicentre retrospective study
Dig Liver Dis
(2014) - et al.
Methotrexate in combination with infliximab is no more effective than infliximab alone in patients with Crohn's disease
Gastroenterology
(2014) - et al.
Balancing benefit vs risk of immunosuppressive therapy for individual patients with inflammatory bowel diseases
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
(2019) - et al.
Early combined immunosuppression for the management of Crohn's disease (REACT): a cluster randomised controlled trial
Lancet
(2015)
Combination therapy with infliximab and azathioprine is superior to monotherapy with either agent in ulcerative colitis
Gastroenterology
Infections and cardiovascular complications are common causes for hospitalization in older patients with inflammatory bowel diseases
Inflamm Bowel Dis
Serious infection and mortality in patients with Crohn's disease: more than 5 years of follow-up in the TREATTM registry
Am J Gastroenterol
Crohn's disease activity and concomitant immunosuppressants affect the risk of serious and opportunistic infections in patients treated with adalimumab
Am J Gastroenterol
Infectious and malignant complications of TNF inhibitor therapy in IBD
Am J Gastroenterol
Infection risk with biologic therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Clin Pharmacol Ther
Systematic review and network meta-analysis: first- and second-line biologic therapies for moderate-severe Crohn's disease
Aliment Pharmacol Ther
Systematic review with network meta-analysis: first- and second-line pharmacotherapy for moderate-severe ulcerative colitis
Aliment Pharmacol Ther
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
Ann Intern Med
Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors
Ann Intern Med
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
BMJ
Cited by (115)
Crohn's disease
2024, The LancetEconomic and clinical burden of chronic corticosteroid use in patients with Crohn[apos]s disease initiated on biologic or conventional therapies in the US: A retrospective claims study
2024, Journal of the American Pharmacists AssociationAntcin-H, a natural triterpene derived from Antrodia cinnamomea, ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice by inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome
2024, Journal of Traditional and Complementary MedicineWithdrawal of Immunomodulators or TNF Antagonists in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Remission on Combination Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
2024, Clinical Gastroenterology and HepatologyA gastrointestinal locally activating Janus kinase inhibitor to treat ulcerative colitis
2023, Journal of Biological ChemistryHLA-DQA1∗05 Genotype and Immunogenicity to Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Antagonists: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
2023, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
This article has an accompanying continuing medical education activity, also eligible for MOC credit, on page e7. Learning Objective–Upon completion of this activity, successful learners will be able to list the relative risk of serious infection with various treatment strategies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease; and in addition to biologic and immunomodulator therapies, list risk factors for serious infections in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.
Conflicts of interest These authors disclose the following: Siddharth Singh has received research grant support from Pfizer and AbbVie, and has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Takeda, Pfizer, and AMAG Pharmaceuticals; Parambir S. Dulai has received research grant support from Takeda, Pfizer, Janssen, Prometheus, Polymedco, and ALPCO, has served as a consultant for Takeda, Janssen, and AbbVie, and has received speaker honoraria from Takeda; Vipul Jairath has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Genetech, Pendopharm, Sandoz, Merck, Takeda, Janssen, Robarts Clinical Trials, Topivert, and Celltrion, has received speaker’s fees from Takeda, Janssen, Shire, Ferring, AbbVie, and Pfizer, and salary support from the John and Susan McDonald Endowed Chair at Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; and William J. Sandborn has received research grant support from Atlantic Healthcare Limited, Amgen, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, Janssen, Takeda, Lilly, and Celgene/Receptos, has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Conatus, Cosmo, Escalier Biosciences, Ferring, Genentech, Gilead, Gossamer Bio, Janssen, Lilly, Miraca Life Sciences, Nivalis Therapeutics, Novartis Nutrition Science Partners, Oppilan Pharma, Otsuka, Paul Hastings, Pfizer, Precision IBD, Progenity, Prometheus Laboratories, Ritter Pharmaceuticals, Robarts Clinical Trials (owned by Health Academic Research Trust), Salix, Shire, Seres Therapeutics, Sigmoid Biotechnologies, Takeda, Tigenix, Tillotts Pharma, UCB Pharma, Vivelix, and has received stock options from Ritter Pharmaceuticals, Oppilan Pharma, Escalier Biosciences, Gossamer Bio, Precision IBD, and Progenity. The remaining author discloses no conflicts.
Funding Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award number K23DK117058 (S.S.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health