Elsevier

Contemporary Clinical Trials

Volume 71, August 2018, Pages 9-17
Contemporary Clinical Trials

Design and participant characteristics of a primary care adaptation of the Look AHEAD Lifestyle Intervention for weight loss in type 2 diabetes: The REAL HEALTH-diabetes study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2018.05.018Get rights and content

Abstract

Background/Aims

The REAL HEALTH -Diabetes Study is a practice-based clinical trial that adapted the Look AHEAD lifestyle intervention for implementation in primary care settings. The trial will compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of in-person group lifestyle intervention, telephone group lifestyle intervention, and individual medical nutrition therapy (MNT), the current recommended standard of care in type 2 diabetes. The primary outcome is percent weight loss at 6 months with outcomes also measured at 12, 18, 24 (intervention completion), and 36 months. Here, we describe the adaptation, trial design, implementation strategies, and baseline characteristics of enrolled participants.

Methods

The study is a three-arm, patient-level, randomized trial conducted in three community health centers (CHCs) and one diabetes practice affiliated with one academic medical center.

Results

The study used existing clinical infrastructure to recruit participants from study sites. Strategies for successful conduct of the trial included partnering with health-center based co-investigator clinicians, engaging primary care providers, and accommodating clinical workflows. Of 248 eligible patients who attended a screening visit, 211 enrolled, with 70 randomly assigned to in-person group lifestyle intervention, 72 to telephone group lifestyle intervention, and 69 to MNT. The cohort was 55% female, 29% non-white, with mean age 62 years and mean BMI 35 kg/m2. Enrollment rates were higher at CHC sites.

Conclusions

A practice-based randomized trial of a complex behavioral lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes can be implemented in community health and usual clinical settings. Participant and provider engagement was higher at local CHC sites reflecting the study implementation focus.

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02320253

Introduction

Twelve percent of U.S. adults have diabetes, with the vast majority having type 2 diabetes; prevalence will increase to 1 in 3 by 2050, if current trends continue [1,2]. Diabetes significantly impacts overall health, quality of life, and national healthcare costs, with $176 billion in direct medical costs and $69 billion in indirect medical costs, including disability, work loss, and premature mortality [3,4]. Eighty-seven percent of adults with diabetes are overweight or obese, and 40.8% are physically inactive [2]. Moderate weight loss of 5–10% of body weight is a highly effective treatment for type 2 diabetes [5]. Lifestyle intervention, including diet and exercise, to achieve sustainable weight loss of this degree is effective and cost-effective for prevention of diabetes and its sequelae over time, as demonstrated by NIDDK's Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) and other lifestyle interventions [[6], [7], [8]]. It has also been particularly effective in preventing and treating burdensome and costly diabetes comorbidities that are not impacted by medications, such as impaired mobility, physical function, and sleep apnea as demonstrated in the Look AHEAD trial. [[9], [10], [11], [12], [13]]

The Look AHEAD trial compared a DPP-adapted lifestyle intervention aimed at sustaining a 7% weight loss and 175 min of weekly activity to a program of diabetes support and education (DSE) in people with type 2 diabetes. Look AHEAD demonstrated significantly greater weight loss (8.6% vs. 0.7%) and fitness after 1 year, resulting in improvements in glycemic control, blood pressure, and lipids with simultaneous reductions in medications and health service expenditure to treat these conditions. Improvements persisted at 4 and 8 years [10,[14], [15], [16], [17]].

There is abundant evidence supporting both the DPP and Look AHEAD interventions [5,[18], [19], [20]]. Nevertheless, adoption in clinical practice has been slow. This may be in part due to the complexity of the interventions and possibly due to a concern that outcomes achieved in highly screened clinical trial participants may not be replicable in less motivated participants or using less intensive interventions. The challenge of translational research is to ensure that interventions adapted for clinical practice are practical, effective, and easily delivered. In the case of the DPP, Medicare approved coverage of DPP lifestyle intervention programs [21] only after successful translation was demonstrated [22,23]. Look AHEAD is similar to the DPP in that it is a complex behavioral lifestyle intervention, but it has the added challenge of diabetes medication adjustment as participants alter diet and activity levels. The high intensity intervention used in Look AHEAD has had only limited adaptation for delivery and testing in practice-based settings [24].

The aim of the REAL HEALTH-Diabetes (Reach Ahead for Lifestyle and Health- Diabetes) Study is to implement and test the effectiveness of an adapted Look AHEAD lifestyle intervention in real-world settings, including community health centers. Secondary aims include determining the reach, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of the program. Two lifestyle intervention formats, in-person group lifestyle intervention or telephone group lifestyle intervention, are being compared in a patient-level randomized controlled trial to referral to a dietitian for individual medical nutrition therapy (MNT), the currently recommended standard of care. REAL HEALTH-Diabetes is a practice-based translational research effort meant to bridge the gap between what has been found to be effective in clinical trials and what is feasible in clinical settings. This paper describes the study design, interventions, enrolled population, and implementation challenges and solutions associated with the launch of the project.

Section snippets

Background

Look AHEAD was an 11-year study that tested the hypothesis that intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) would reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease compared to diabetes support and education (DSE) in adults with type 2 diabetes. Although both the ILI and DSE arms resulted in excellent control of cardiovascular risk factors, the ILI participants achieved the same cardiometabolic outcomes with fewer medications, and had more favorable outcomes in weight, fitness, sleep, mood, sleep apnea,

Recruitment and enrollment

Recruitment started in January 2015 at the community health centers, then expanded sequentially to meet the enrollment target starting with 1) patients who lived nearby but did not receive primary care at that health center, 2) a community endocrinology practice near one of the health centers (NSMC), 3) all MGH primary care patients, 4) MGH Diabetes Center patients, and finally 5) Newton-Wellesley Hospital endocrinology practice patients. Recruitment concluded in July 2017. A total of 449

Discussion

The REAL HEALTH-Diabetes Study has met its initial goals of adapting the Look AHEAD lifestyle intervention to be delivered at lower intensity in a predominantly group format and enrolling a sufficient number of participants to test the effectiveness of the adaptation and different delivery formats compared to referral to individual medical nutrition therapy. The study population is diverse and representative of a usual primary care population drawn from community health centers, community

Conclusions

REAL HEALTH-Diabetes successfully enrolled a diverse cohort into a practice-based group adaptation of the Look AHEAD lifestyle intervention. Although the initial intervention was targeted to community health centers, enrollment was expanded to other sites to meet the recruitment target in a timely fashion. Nonetheless, provider engagement and enrollment of eligible patients was highest at community health centers owing to the engagement of program leaders based at each health center. REAL

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Wynne Armand MD, Elisha Atkins MD, Roger Pasinski MD, Sheila Arsenault RN, James Morrill MD, PhD, Lori Hooley RN, Kristin Dalton and Roshni Singh for their support of and contributions to this project.

Disclosures

LMD serves on the Advisory Boards of Omada Health and JanaCare.

Author information

DJW and LMD conceived of the study and drafted the manuscript. YC and BP performed statistical analyses. DEL, AD, LB, VG, JP, AR, BC, RL, and AW contributed to study design, collection and interpretation of data, and revised the manuscript critically for intellectual content. All authors give approval of the manuscript version to be submitted.

Guarantor

DJW and LMD had full access to the data in the study and take full responsibility for the work as a whole, including the study design, data integrity, and accuracy of the analysis.

Funding acknowledgement

This work is supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R18DK102737) to DW and LD, under PAR 12-172, Translational Research to Improve Obesity and Diabetes Outcomes. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

References (34)

  • The 10-year cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention or metformin for diabetes prevention: an intent-to-treat analysis of the DPP/DPPOS

    Diabetes Care

    (2012)
  • Y. Sun et al.

    The effectiveness and cost of lifestyle interventions including nutrition education for diabetes prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    J. Acad. Nutr. Diet.

    (2017)
  • C.G. Foy et al.

    Intensive lifestyle intervention improves physical function among obese adults with knee pain: findings from the Look AHEAD trial

    Obesity (Silver Spring)

    (2011)
  • X. Pi-Sunyer et al.

    Reduction in weight and cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes: one-year results of the Look AHEAD trial

    Diabetes Care

    (2007)
  • R.R. Rubin et al.

    Impact of intensive lifestyle intervention on depression and health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes: the Look AHEAD trial

    Diabetes Care

    (2014)
  • G.D. Foster et al.

    A randomized study on the effect of weight loss on obstructive sleep apnea among obese patients with type 2 diabetes: the sleep AHEAD study

    Arch. Intern. Med.

    (2009)
  • S.T. Kuna et al.

    Long-term effect of weight loss on obstructive sleep apnea severity in obese patients with type 2 diabetes

    Sleep

    (2013)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Medically tailored meals for food insecurity and type 2 diabetes: Protocol for the food as medicine for diabetes (FAME-D) trial

      2023, Contemporary Clinical Trials
      Citation Excerpt :

      The meals are prepared and delivered by Community Servings, a not-for-profit community-based organization that has been providing medically tailored meals for over 30 years. Both the medically tailored meals and the lifestyle intervention [35,36] have been iteratively developed over a number of years by incorporating recipient feedback and suggestions. The 6-month intervention period was selected given the physiologic window over which hemoglobin A1c changes and after discussion with Medicaid officials and representatives of health insurers regarding whether an MTM intervention could become a covered insurance benefit.

    • Effective recruitment for practice-based research: Lessons from the REAL HEALTH-Diabetes Study

      2019, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Participants were on average 61 years old, 55.5% female, 76.8% white, 13.3% Hispanic, and 4.7% Black or African American, with mean BMI of 35.1 kg/m2. Complete baseline characteristics are described elsewhere [7]. Table 1 depicts outreach to the total of 449 health care providers for permission to contact their patients.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text