Design and participant characteristics of a primary care adaptation of the Look AHEAD Lifestyle Intervention for weight loss in type 2 diabetes: The REAL HEALTH-diabetes study
Introduction
Twelve percent of U.S. adults have diabetes, with the vast majority having type 2 diabetes; prevalence will increase to 1 in 3 by 2050, if current trends continue [1,2]. Diabetes significantly impacts overall health, quality of life, and national healthcare costs, with $176 billion in direct medical costs and $69 billion in indirect medical costs, including disability, work loss, and premature mortality [3,4]. Eighty-seven percent of adults with diabetes are overweight or obese, and 40.8% are physically inactive [2]. Moderate weight loss of 5–10% of body weight is a highly effective treatment for type 2 diabetes [5]. Lifestyle intervention, including diet and exercise, to achieve sustainable weight loss of this degree is effective and cost-effective for prevention of diabetes and its sequelae over time, as demonstrated by NIDDK's Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) and other lifestyle interventions [[6], [7], [8]]. It has also been particularly effective in preventing and treating burdensome and costly diabetes comorbidities that are not impacted by medications, such as impaired mobility, physical function, and sleep apnea as demonstrated in the Look AHEAD trial. [[9], [10], [11], [12], [13]]
The Look AHEAD trial compared a DPP-adapted lifestyle intervention aimed at sustaining a 7% weight loss and 175 min of weekly activity to a program of diabetes support and education (DSE) in people with type 2 diabetes. Look AHEAD demonstrated significantly greater weight loss (8.6% vs. 0.7%) and fitness after 1 year, resulting in improvements in glycemic control, blood pressure, and lipids with simultaneous reductions in medications and health service expenditure to treat these conditions. Improvements persisted at 4 and 8 years [10,[14], [15], [16], [17]].
There is abundant evidence supporting both the DPP and Look AHEAD interventions [5,[18], [19], [20]]. Nevertheless, adoption in clinical practice has been slow. This may be in part due to the complexity of the interventions and possibly due to a concern that outcomes achieved in highly screened clinical trial participants may not be replicable in less motivated participants or using less intensive interventions. The challenge of translational research is to ensure that interventions adapted for clinical practice are practical, effective, and easily delivered. In the case of the DPP, Medicare approved coverage of DPP lifestyle intervention programs [21] only after successful translation was demonstrated [22,23]. Look AHEAD is similar to the DPP in that it is a complex behavioral lifestyle intervention, but it has the added challenge of diabetes medication adjustment as participants alter diet and activity levels. The high intensity intervention used in Look AHEAD has had only limited adaptation for delivery and testing in practice-based settings [24].
The aim of the REAL HEALTH-Diabetes (Reach Ahead for Lifestyle and Health- Diabetes) Study is to implement and test the effectiveness of an adapted Look AHEAD lifestyle intervention in real-world settings, including community health centers. Secondary aims include determining the reach, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of the program. Two lifestyle intervention formats, in-person group lifestyle intervention or telephone group lifestyle intervention, are being compared in a patient-level randomized controlled trial to referral to a dietitian for individual medical nutrition therapy (MNT), the currently recommended standard of care. REAL HEALTH-Diabetes is a practice-based translational research effort meant to bridge the gap between what has been found to be effective in clinical trials and what is feasible in clinical settings. This paper describes the study design, interventions, enrolled population, and implementation challenges and solutions associated with the launch of the project.
Section snippets
Background
Look AHEAD was an 11-year study that tested the hypothesis that intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) would reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease compared to diabetes support and education (DSE) in adults with type 2 diabetes. Although both the ILI and DSE arms resulted in excellent control of cardiovascular risk factors, the ILI participants achieved the same cardiometabolic outcomes with fewer medications, and had more favorable outcomes in weight, fitness, sleep, mood, sleep apnea,
Recruitment and enrollment
Recruitment started in January 2015 at the community health centers, then expanded sequentially to meet the enrollment target starting with 1) patients who lived nearby but did not receive primary care at that health center, 2) a community endocrinology practice near one of the health centers (NSMC), 3) all MGH primary care patients, 4) MGH Diabetes Center patients, and finally 5) Newton-Wellesley Hospital endocrinology practice patients. Recruitment concluded in July 2017. A total of 449
Discussion
The REAL HEALTH-Diabetes Study has met its initial goals of adapting the Look AHEAD lifestyle intervention to be delivered at lower intensity in a predominantly group format and enrolling a sufficient number of participants to test the effectiveness of the adaptation and different delivery formats compared to referral to individual medical nutrition therapy. The study population is diverse and representative of a usual primary care population drawn from community health centers, community
Conclusions
REAL HEALTH-Diabetes successfully enrolled a diverse cohort into a practice-based group adaptation of the Look AHEAD lifestyle intervention. Although the initial intervention was targeted to community health centers, enrollment was expanded to other sites to meet the recruitment target in a timely fashion. Nonetheless, provider engagement and enrollment of eligible patients was highest at community health centers owing to the engagement of program leaders based at each health center. REAL
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Wynne Armand MD, Elisha Atkins MD, Roger Pasinski MD, Sheila Arsenault RN, James Morrill MD, PhD, Lori Hooley RN, Kristin Dalton and Roshni Singh for their support of and contributions to this project.
Disclosures
LMD serves on the Advisory Boards of Omada Health and JanaCare.
Author information
DJW and LMD conceived of the study and drafted the manuscript. YC and BP performed statistical analyses. DEL, AD, LB, VG, JP, AR, BC, RL, and AW contributed to study design, collection and interpretation of data, and revised the manuscript critically for intellectual content. All authors give approval of the manuscript version to be submitted.
Guarantor
DJW and LMD had full access to the data in the study and take full responsibility for the work as a whole, including the study design, data integrity, and accuracy of the analysis.
Funding acknowledgement
This work is supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R18DK102737) to DW and LD, under PAR 12-172, Translational Research to Improve Obesity and Diabetes Outcomes. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
References (34)
- et al.
Cost of a group translation of the diabetes prevention program: healthy living partnerships to prevent diabetes
Am. J. Prev. Med.
(2013) - et al.
Implications of the diabetes prevention program and Look AHEAD clinical trials for lifestyle interventions
J. Am. Diet. Assoc.
(2008) - et al.
10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the diabetes prevention program outcomes study
Lancet
(2009) - et al.
Design and participant characteristics for a randomized effectiveness trial of an intensive lifestyle intervention to reduce cardiovascular risk in adults with type 2 diabetes: the I-D-HEALTH study
Contemp. Clin. Trials
(2016) - et al.
Group versus individual phone-based obesity treatment for rural women
Eat. Behav.
(2010) - et al.
Trends in prevalence and control of diabetes in the United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2010
Ann. Intern. Med.
(2014) National Diabetes Statistics. Report, 2017
(2017)Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012
Diabetes Care
(2013)- et al.
Medical costs associated with type 2 diabetes complications and comorbidities
Am. J. Manag. Care
(2013) - et al.
Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes
N. Engl. J. Med.
(2013)
The 10-year cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention or metformin for diabetes prevention: an intent-to-treat analysis of the DPP/DPPOS
Diabetes Care
The effectiveness and cost of lifestyle interventions including nutrition education for diabetes prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
J. Acad. Nutr. Diet.
Intensive lifestyle intervention improves physical function among obese adults with knee pain: findings from the Look AHEAD trial
Obesity (Silver Spring)
Reduction in weight and cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes: one-year results of the Look AHEAD trial
Diabetes Care
Impact of intensive lifestyle intervention on depression and health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes: the Look AHEAD trial
Diabetes Care
A randomized study on the effect of weight loss on obstructive sleep apnea among obese patients with type 2 diabetes: the sleep AHEAD study
Arch. Intern. Med.
Long-term effect of weight loss on obstructive sleep apnea severity in obese patients with type 2 diabetes
Sleep
Cited by (11)
Psychological and Behavioral Predictors of Weight Loss in the Reach Ahead for Lifestyle and Health-Diabetes Lifestyle Intervention Cohort
2023, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and DieteticsMedically tailored meals for food insecurity and type 2 diabetes: Protocol for the food as medicine for diabetes (FAME-D) trial
2023, Contemporary Clinical TrialsCitation Excerpt :The meals are prepared and delivered by Community Servings, a not-for-profit community-based organization that has been providing medically tailored meals for over 30 years. Both the medically tailored meals and the lifestyle intervention [35,36] have been iteratively developed over a number of years by incorporating recipient feedback and suggestions. The 6-month intervention period was selected given the physiologic window over which hemoglobin A1c changes and after discussion with Medicaid officials and representatives of health insurers regarding whether an MTM intervention could become a covered insurance benefit.
Effective recruitment for practice-based research: Lessons from the REAL HEALTH-Diabetes Study
2019, Contemporary Clinical Trials CommunicationsCitation Excerpt :Participants were on average 61 years old, 55.5% female, 76.8% white, 13.3% Hispanic, and 4.7% Black or African American, with mean BMI of 35.1 kg/m2. Complete baseline characteristics are described elsewhere [7]. Table 1 depicts outreach to the total of 449 health care providers for permission to contact their patients.
Medical Nutrition Therapy, In-Person, or Telephone Group Lifestyle Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes? A Qualitative Study of Patient Perceptions and Treatment Preferences
2024, Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care