6
Effects of being born small for gestational age on long-term intellectual performance

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2008.01.014Get rights and content

Size at birth has been associated repeatedly with increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality later in life. However, there is accumulating evidence to suggest an association between being born small for gestational age (SGA) and increased risk of lower intelligence, poor academic performance, low social competence and behavioural problems, compared with individuals born appropriate for gestational age. Crude neurological handicaps, such as cerebral palsy, are extremely rare in children born SGA at term. Such handicaps are more common in very premature children. However, there does appear to be an increase in the risk for non-severe neurological dysfunction in individuals born SGA. Intellectual performance is evaluated in young children in several different ways, including standardized tests such as Weschler's Intelligence Scale – Revised, and teachers and parents' reports. In adulthood, indirect variables such as education and occupation are used in addition to standardized tests. It may be possible to modify the effects of SGA on intellectual development by breast feeding the baby for more than 6 months. Nutrient-enriched formula does not have any advantages when it comes to intellectual development, and induces a risk of rapid weight gain and eventually overweight. Growth hormone treatment may also have some effect on intelligence quotient.

Section snippets

Preschool age

Although most studies have been performed on school-age children, subnormal performance in intellectual capacity has been reported at early ages among SGA-born children compared with AGA-born children. In 2000, Sommerfelt et al presented a cohort study of 338 term infants born in Norway or Sweden with birth weights below the 15th percentile. The children were examined at 5 years of age. SGA-born children had a lower mean intelligence quotient (IQ) compared with AGA-born children, even after

Discussion

Individuals born SGA form a heterogeneous group, including those born small due to pathological reasons and those born small due to genetic, non-pathological reasons. Most studies concerning SGA and intellectual functions exclude infants born with major handicaps, such as cerebral palsy and major malformations. In the future, it would be interesting to be able to separate those infants born small but healthy in the analyses.

The mixture between pathological and non-pathological small babies will

Conclusion

Being born SGA is associated with mild to moderate school problems in childhood and adolescence, and with lower psychological and intellectual performance in young adulthood compared with AGA controls. Catch-up growth in height reduces the risks associated with being born SGA. SGA-born children seem to gain the greatest advantages from breast feeding.

Practice points

  • infants born SGA should be breast fed for at least 24 weeks

  • children born SGA without spontaneous catch-up growth may benefit from

References (46)

  • O. Hollo et al.

    Academic achievement of small-for-gestational-age children at age 10 years

    Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

    (2002)
  • M.J. O'Keeffe et al.

    Learning, cognitive, and attentional problems in adolescents born small for gestational age

    Pediatrics

    (2003)
  • Y.K. van Pareren et al.

    Intelligence and psychosocial functioning during long-term growth hormone therapy in children born small for gestational age

    The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

    (2004)
  • Y. Peng et al.

    Outcome of low birthweight in China: a 16-year longitudinal study

    Acta Paediatrica

    (2005)
  • S. Chaudhari et al.

    Pune low birth weight study – cognitive abilities and educational performance at twelve years

    Indian Journal of Pediatrics

    (2004)
  • L. Henrichsen et al.

    Delayed growth and reduced intelligence in 9–17 year old intrauterine growth retarded children compared with their monozygous co-twins

    Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica

    (1986)
  • R.S. Strauss

    Adult functional outcome of those born small for gestational age: twenty-six-year follow-up of the 1970 British Birth Cohort

    The Journal of the American Medical Association

    (2000)
  • T.D. Matte et al.

    Influence of variation in birth weight within normal range and within sibships on IQ at age 7 years: cohort study

    BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)

    (2001)
  • E.M. Lundgren et al.

    Intellectual and psychological performance in males born small for gestational age with and without catch-up growth

    Pediatric Research

    (2001)
  • N. Bergvall et al.

    Birth characteristics and risk of low intellectual performance in early adulthood: are the associations confounded by socioeconomic factors in adolescence or familial effects?

    Pediatrics

    (2006)
  • G. Viggedal et al.

    Neuropsychological follow-up into young adulthood of term infants born small for gestational age

    Medical Science Monitor

    (2004)
  • P.M. Fitzhardinge

    Early growth and development in low-birthweight infants following treatment in an intensive care nursery

    Pediatrics

    (1975)
  • M. Westwood et al.

    Growth and development of full-term nonasphyxiated small-for-gestational-age newborns: follow-up through adolescence

    Pediatrics

    (1983)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Prenatal exposure to multiple metals and birth outcomes: An observational study within the National Children's Study cohort

      2021, Environment International
      Citation Excerpt :

      Specifically, low birthweight, an indicator of poor fetal growth, has been associated with cardiovascular disease (Barker et al., 1989; Rich-Edwards et al., 1997; Frankel et al., 1996; Lawlor et al., 2005; Eriksson et al., 2001; Zanetti et al., 2018), high blood pressure (Law and Shiell, 1996; Barker et al., 1993; Huxley et al., 2000), impaired glucose tolerance (Hales et al., 1991), and diabetes mellitus (Barker et al., 1993; Lithell et al., 1996) in adult life. Additionally, intrauterine growth restriction and infants born small for gestational age are more susceptible to several adverse health outcomes such as cardiovascular disease and neurodevelopmental dysfunction (Clayton et al., 2007; Sharma et al., 2016; Lundgren and Tuvemo, 2008). Significant risk factors for growth restriction in infants include maternal malnutrition (Wu et al., 2004), older maternal age (Muhammad et al., 2010; Odibo et al., 2006), socioeconomic factors (e.g., lower levels of educational attainment and unmarried marital status) (Phung et al., 2003; Gage et al., 2013), maternal smoking (Phung et al., 2003; Delpisheh et al., 2008; Reeves and Bernstein, 2008), maternal alcohol use (Bandoli et al., 2019; Foltran et al., 2011), short interpregnancy interval (Liauw et al., 2019; Conde-Agudelo et al., 2006), inadequate gestational weight gain (Hasan et al., 2019; Strauss and Dietz, 1999), and placental or umbilical cord abnormalities (Muhammad et al., 2010; Schmid et al., 2013; Krishna and Bhalerao, 2011).

    • Behavioral outcomes of school-aged full-term small-for-gestational-age infants: A nationwide Japanese population-based study

      2017, Brain and Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, SGA infants are at increased risk of short stature, obesity, hypertension, and insulin resistance in later life [3]. Recently, much attention has been focused on the neurological prognoses of SGA infants [4]. A recent meta-analysis showed that neurological development in full-term SGA infants was poorer than that in full-term appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants [5].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text