Practice points
- •
infants born SGA should be breast fed for at least 24 weeks
- •
children born SGA without spontaneous catch-up growth may benefit from
Although most studies have been performed on school-age children, subnormal performance in intellectual capacity has been reported at early ages among SGA-born children compared with AGA-born children. In 2000, Sommerfelt et al presented a cohort study of 338 term infants born in Norway or Sweden with birth weights below the 15th percentile. The children were examined at 5 years of age. SGA-born children had a lower mean intelligence quotient (IQ) compared with AGA-born children, even after
Individuals born SGA form a heterogeneous group, including those born small due to pathological reasons and those born small due to genetic, non-pathological reasons. Most studies concerning SGA and intellectual functions exclude infants born with major handicaps, such as cerebral palsy and major malformations. In the future, it would be interesting to be able to separate those infants born small but healthy in the analyses.
The mixture between pathological and non-pathological small babies will
Being born SGA is associated with mild to moderate school problems in childhood and adolescence, and with lower psychological and intellectual performance in young adulthood compared with AGA controls. Catch-up growth in height reduces the risks associated with being born SGA. SGA-born children seem to gain the greatest advantages from breast feeding. infants born SGA should be breast fed for at least 24 weeks children born SGA without spontaneous catch-up growth may benefit fromPractice points
Specifically, low birthweight, an indicator of poor fetal growth, has been associated with cardiovascular disease (Barker et al., 1989; Rich-Edwards et al., 1997; Frankel et al., 1996; Lawlor et al., 2005; Eriksson et al., 2001; Zanetti et al., 2018), high blood pressure (Law and Shiell, 1996; Barker et al., 1993; Huxley et al., 2000), impaired glucose tolerance (Hales et al., 1991), and diabetes mellitus (Barker et al., 1993; Lithell et al., 1996) in adult life. Additionally, intrauterine growth restriction and infants born small for gestational age are more susceptible to several adverse health outcomes such as cardiovascular disease and neurodevelopmental dysfunction (Clayton et al., 2007; Sharma et al., 2016; Lundgren and Tuvemo, 2008). Significant risk factors for growth restriction in infants include maternal malnutrition (Wu et al., 2004), older maternal age (Muhammad et al., 2010; Odibo et al., 2006), socioeconomic factors (e.g., lower levels of educational attainment and unmarried marital status) (Phung et al., 2003; Gage et al., 2013), maternal smoking (Phung et al., 2003; Delpisheh et al., 2008; Reeves and Bernstein, 2008), maternal alcohol use (Bandoli et al., 2019; Foltran et al., 2011), short interpregnancy interval (Liauw et al., 2019; Conde-Agudelo et al., 2006), inadequate gestational weight gain (Hasan et al., 2019; Strauss and Dietz, 1999), and placental or umbilical cord abnormalities (Muhammad et al., 2010; Schmid et al., 2013; Krishna and Bhalerao, 2011).
Furthermore, SGA infants are at increased risk of short stature, obesity, hypertension, and insulin resistance in later life [3]. Recently, much attention has been focused on the neurological prognoses of SGA infants [4]. A recent meta-analysis showed that neurological development in full-term SGA infants was poorer than that in full-term appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants [5].