Elsevier

Atherosclerosis

Volume 219, Issue 1, November 2011, Pages 194-199
Atherosclerosis

Arterial stiffness and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in young healthy volunteers: The early vascular ageing Aristotle University Thessaloniki Study (EVA–ARIS Study)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.07.111Get rights and content

Abstract

Differences in 24 h blood pressure (BP) monitoring parameters such as average 24 h BP, day to night BP ratio and BP variability could have an impact in arterial stiffness. The study hypothesis was that despite similar average BP values in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring subjects with increased 24 h BP variability may have increased arterial stiffness.

The study population consisted of 115 consecutive young healthy volunteers. Carotid–femoral PWV was measured in all subjects. Clinic BP was measured and an appropriate cuff was fitted on the non-dominant arm of each subject for a 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring session. Waist to hip ratio as well as BMI was measured. Family history and smoking habits were recorded. In univariate analysis, estimated carotid–femoral PWV showed a significant correlation with age, weight, waist circumference, height, clinic systolic and diastolic BP, 24-h systolic and diastolic BP, 24-h pulse pressure, 24-h systolic and diastolic BP variability, daytime systolic and diastolic BP, daytime pulse pressure, daytime systolic and diastolic BP variability, nighttime systolic BP, nighttime pulse pressure and nighttime systolic BP variability. In multivariate regression analysis, age (B = 0.95, P < 0.001) and 24 h systolic BP variability (B = 0.28, P < 0.001) were independent determinanats of arterial stiffness.

In conclusions, increased 24 h systolic BP variability is associated with arterial stiffness in young healthy volunteers. Pulse wave velocity in a young healthy population is useful to identify determinants of premature arterial stiffness, thus further elucidating the aspects of early vascular ageing.

Introduction

A recent report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee demonstrated that cardiovascular (CV) disease manifestations still remain a crucial menace to public health [1]. A number of epidemiological studies have proved that ageing is a dominant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases [2]. Early vascular ageing (EVA) represents the acceleration of the vascular ageing process. EVA could provide a valuable tool for the clinical investigation and guidance of individuals at increased cardiovascular risk, especially those with marginal elevation of classic risk factors or with a strong family history of early CV disease manifestations [3], [4].

Arterial stiffness is increased when elastic properties of the arterial wall are reduced. Ageing is a procedure that causes structural and functional modifications in the vasculature, resulting in decreased arterial compliance and increased arterial stiffness [1], [5], [6]. Aortic stiffness may represent an intermediate endpoint for CV events. Carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) has been considered as a direct measurement of arterial stiffness. Pulse wave velocity is the speed at which the pressure waveforms travel along the aorta and large arteries during each cardiac cycle. PWV has a better predictive value than classical CV risk factors possibly because it depicts the cumulative effect of both known and non-identified CV risk factors on the large arteries [7]. Therefore, it represents a useful spectrum through which the EVA process could be thoroughly yet non-invasively investigated. Factors that possibly have an influence in the EVA process may include CV risk factors such as age, gender, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, hypertension, and family history of early CV disease.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has gradually established its utility not only in the research field but also in clinical practice, as it allows the study of the blood pressure (BP), heart rate and circadian 24-h BP profile of the patients. The 24-h BP parameters are reproducible and correlate better with target organ damage than office BP [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. There is also evidence that ambulatory values predict better CV morbidity and mortality than office values [13], [14], [15], [16]. In addition, combined office and ambulatory BP measurements have also been used to identify conditions, such as white-coat and masked hypertension [17], [18], [19].

In the present study, we hypothesized that differences in blood pressure monitoring parameters such as average 24 h BP, day to night BP ratio, and blood pressure variability could have an impact on arterial stiffness. We measured pulse wave velocity in a young healthy population and we explored possible parameters from ABPM and demographics that may associate with increased arterial stiffness. Our aim was to investigate relationships between arterial stiffness and 24-h ABPM profile and to identify determinants of premature arterial stiffness. To our knowledge, there are no previous studies of the impact of ABPM parameters on arterial stiffness in a healthy young population.

Section snippets

Study population

All subjects volunteered to participate in the study and gave their written consent to participate. The institutional review board approved the human research protocol. The study population consisted of 115 consecutive healthy volunteers with age range 18–24 years old. All participants fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (1) no history of hypertension; (2) no history of diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome or other chronic inflammatory disease; (3) no pharmacological

Results

Demographic data and 24-h ABPM parameters of our population are listed in Table 1, Table 2. Characteristics of subjects with EVA are reported in Table 3. In univariate analysis, estimated carotid–femoral PWV showed a significant correlation with age, height, weight, waist circumference, clinic systolic and diastolic BP, 24-h systolic and diastolic BP, 24-h pulse pressure, standard deviation of 24-h systolic and diastolic BP, daytime systolic and diastolic BP, daytime pulse pressure, standard

Discussion

Vascular ageing is the effect of molecular mechanisms including those leading to oxidative damage of macromolecules, formation of advanced glycation end products, telomere damage, depletion of vascular progenitor cells and the accumulation of senescent endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells. These processes are accentuated in the presence of classical cardiovascular risk factors. Even though the existence of these associations has been documented, the relationships between classical risk

Perspectives

The findings of the present study indicate that increased 24 h BP variability is significantly associated with arterial stiffness and EVA in a young healthy population. A major goal remains to design basic experiments aimed at elucidating the mechanisms involved in the age- and BP-associated alterations in the cardiovascular structure and function that occur in apparently healthy people, and finally to establish through clinical trials strategies that reduce or prevent increases in stiffness,

References (51)

  • P.V. Vaitkevicius et al.

    Effects of age and aerobic capacity on arterial stiffness in healthy adults

    Circulation

    (1993)
  • Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications

    Eur Heart J

    (2006)
  • K. Chavanu et al.

    Role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension

    Am J Health Syst Pharm

    (2008)
  • P. Verdecchia et al.

    Blood pressure monitoring. Task force III: target-organ damage, morbidity and mortality

    Blood Press Monit

    (1999)
  • Task Force II: Blood Pressure Measurement Cardiovascular Outcome et al.

    Participants of the 2001 consensus conference on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

    Blood Press Monit

    (2001)
  • R.S. Khattar et al.

    Effect of aging on the prognostic significance of ambulatory systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure in essential hypertension

    Circulation

    (2001)
  • Office versus Ambulatory Blood Pressure (OvA) Study Investigators

    Prognostic value of ambulatory blood-pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension

    N Engl J Med

    (2003)
  • S. Lewington et al.

    Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies

    Lancet

    (2002)
  • E. Dolan et al.

    Superiority of ambulatory over clinic blood pressure measurement in predicting mortality: the Dublin outcome study

    Hypertension

    (2005)
  • M. Kikuya et al.

    Ambulatory blood pressure and 10-year risk of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality: the Ohasama study

    Hypertension

    (2005)
  • T.W. Hansen et al.

    Ambulatory blood pressure and mortality: a population-based study

    Hypertension

    (2005)
  • V. Kotsis et al.

    Target organ damage in white coat hypertension and masked hypertension

    Am J Hypertens

    (2008)
  • G. Mancia et al.

    Long-term risk of sustained hypertension in white-coat or masked hypertension

    Hypertension

    (2009)
  • T.G. Pickering et al.

    Masked hypertension: a review

    Hypertens Res

    (2007)
  • N.A. Zakopoulos et al.

    White coat effect in normotension and hypertension

    Blood Press Monit

    (2002)
  • Cited by (64)

    • Baseline risk markers and visit-to-visit variability in relation to kidney outcomes – A post-hoc analysis of the PERL study

      2022, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      While our study was performed in a highly defined and controlled population, several limiting factors could have influenced our results. The variability assessment period was relatively short and includes only 3–4 measurements, which in the case of SBP VV might underestimate variability [24]; and in the case of HbA1c VV, the measure itself is inherently problematic as HbA1c reflects an individual’s mean glycaemic state across a period of three months, thus the VV might be difficult to assess properly over a short period. In addition, during the run-in phase in which VV was assessed, participants were prescribed, if not already in treatment with RASi, and BP was stabilized.

    • Roles of exosomal miRNA in vascular aging

      2021, Pharmacological Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Kotsis et al. measured cfPWV, waist to hip ratio, BMI, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABPM), and assessed family histories and smoking habits among young healthy volunteers. They concluded that age and 24-h systolic BP variability are independent determinants of arterial stiffness [150]. In addition, a new score uses ABPM values and classic cardiovascular risk factors to identify EVA in patients with hypertension [151].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text