Elsevier

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Volume 30, Issue 10, October 2015, Pages 1705-1709
The Journal of Arthroplasty

Reduced Length of Hospitalization in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Using an Updated Enhanced Recovery After Orthopedic Surgery (ERAS) Pathway

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Decreasing hospital length of stay may attenuate costs associated with total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine if updates to an existing orthopedic enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway would improve length of hospitalization. Clinical and demographic data were collected on 252 primary total knee arthroplasties between January 2012 and July 2013. Pre-updated and post-updated ERAS pathway cohorts were analyzed for length of stay, clinical outcomes, and re-admissions. The mean length of stay decreased from 76.6 hours to 56.1 hours after implementation of the evidence-based orthopedic enhanced recovery after surgery pathway (P < 0.001). This improvement was possible without a concomitant increase in readmission rates.

Section snippets

Study Design

After approval from the internal review board, all patients who had undergone primary TKA at our institution were retrospectively identified over a period from January 2012 to July 2013. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients who had undergone surgery with a standardized care pathway that included femoral nerve block and those who had undergone surgery with the updated ERAS pathway (Table 1). Implementation of the updated ERAS pathway occurred in early 2013. Moving retrospectively from early

Results

Two hundred and fifty two subjects total were retrospectively analyzed before and after the implementation of the updated ERAS pathway. There were no significant differences in gender, body mass index, the use of spinal anesthesia as the primary anesthetic, or frequency of surgeon intra-articular injection between groups (Table 2). Mean age was 68.4 and 66 years in the pre and post pathway groups, respectively (P = 0.056).

The primary outcome of this investigation was hospital LOS. Median LOS was

Discussion

Our study reveals that incorporation of recent innovations in the perioperative care of TKAs can result in clinically meaningful decreases in post-operative length of stay without increasing readmission rates. In this evolving health care environment, decreasing costs while improving outcomes should be a primary goal of any health care delivery system. The data presented here demonstrate that multiple key evidence-based improvements to an existing clinical value stream likely had a tremendous

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Stuart A. Grant for his encouragement and mentorship throughout the research process. We also acknowledge the contribution of April E. Slee, MS, our statistical consultant from Axio Research, Seattle, WA USA.

References (26)

  • M.F. Drummond et al.

    Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes

    (2005)
  • D.M. Berwick et al.

    The triple aim: care, health, and cost

    Health Aff

    (2008)
  • D.K. Owens et al.

    Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of P. High-value, cost-conscious health care: concepts for clinicians to evaluate the benefits, harms, and costs of medical interventions

    Ann Intern Med

    (2011)
  • Cited by (157)

    • Management of perioperative pain after TKA

      2023, Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    One or more of the authors of this paper have disclosed potential or pertinent conflicts of interest, which may include receipt of payment, either direct or indirect, institutional support, or association with an entity in the biomedical field which may be perceived to have potential conflict of interest with this work. For full disclosure statements refer to http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.007.

    1

    Contribution: Study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript preparation.

    2

    Attestation: This author reviewed the original study data and data analysis, and approved the final manuscript.

    3

    Conflicts of Interest: None.

    4

    Contribution: Data analysis and manuscript preparation.

    5

    Attestation: This author approved the final manuscript.

    6

    Contribution: Study design, manuscript preparation.

    7

    Attestation: This author approved the final manuscript.

    View full text