Research reportEffectiveness of offering healthy labelled meals in improving the nutritional quality of lunch meals eaten in a worksite canteen☆
Introduction
Food produced and eaten outside home has consistently been associated with a high energy content as well as a relatively lower nutrient density (Kjollesdal et al., 2011, Lachat et al., 2009, Lassen et al., 2007, Wu and Sturm, 2013). It has therefore been considered that a consequence of eating food produced outside home on a frequent basis may contribute to both less healthy dietary habits and higher odds of weight gain (Bezerra et al., 2012, Kjollesdal et al., 2011). At the same time food produced and consumed away from home provides an increasing proportion of the daily food energy intake, making the restaurant and food service sector an important arena for promoting healthy dietary practices as a part of a long-term solution to combat the current obesity epidemic.
Especially worksites are seen as an important arena in which behavioural patterns such as healthy eating can be promoted. Worksites provide a natural social context where most employees eat at least one daily meal during their workday. Thus, worksites could potentially reach a large part of the adult population, including many who has not traditionally been engaged in health promotion activities (Kahn-Marshall and Gallant, 2012, Lassen et al., 2011).
In recent years the food service industry has implemented various initiatives aimed at improving the healthfulness of its servings. This includes the possibility of selecting healthy side dishes in fast food restaurants (Kirkpatrick et al., 2013), more fruit and vegetables in worksite canteens (Lassen et al., 2004, Thorsen et al., 2010), restriction of foods high in salt, fat and sugar (Geaney, Harrington, Fitzgerald, & Perry, 2011) and providing foods with low energy density (Lowe et al., 2010). Although such changes clearly represent a step in the right direction, the healthier options are often limited and focus on specific nutritional benefits, for example low fat options (Chand, Eyles, & Ni, 2012). Furthermore, many food establishments do not actively inform and encourage the selection of available healthier options (Kirkpatrick et al., 2013) and customers therefore might not be aware of the nutritional quality of their meal choices (Hoefkens, Pieniak, Van, & Verbeke, 2012).
In February 2012 the Danish Veterinary and Food Administration introduced labelling freshly prepared meals with a healthy label, in form of the Nordic Keyhole symbol, to the restaurant and canteen sector as a policy option to address this situation. Since 2009 the Keyhole symbol has been found on pre-packed food products in supermarkets in Denmark, and it is now widely recognized by Danish consumers as a sign of a healthy choice. Foods eligible to carry the healthy label must fulfill certain conditions. These conditions include criteria for the maximum amounts of fat, salt and sugars, together with the minimum amount of dietary fibre and wholegrain in 25 different food groups. Table 1 shows the criteria for the food groups comprising ready-made meals. The criteria are based on the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations, which are founded on scientific evidence (Nordic Council of Ministers, 2004). Keyhole labelling in restaurants and canteens is voluntary, but the restaurants and canteens need to go through a certification process to use the label on freshly prepared products, and at least one labelled meal must be present at the daily menu. Moreover, at least one employee at the restaurant must complete a Keyhole education course and 75% of all employees must go through a webinar (or equivalent training) to be able to communicate the healthy label to the customers (Danish Veterinary, 2013).
The objective of this study was to evaluate the governmental Keyhole certification program in a quasi-experimental study design with follow up, i.e. the effectiveness of serving healthy labelled meals to improve the nutritional quality of lunch meals eaten in a worksite canteen. A further objective was to examine the customer acceptability by measuring changes in edible plate waste, total amount of sold meals and customer food satisfaction.
Section snippets
Recruitment and study design
An employee canteen at a hospital was invited to participate in the present study, as the canteen had the ambition to become one of the pioneers in achieving the Keyhole certification in Denmark. The goal of the intervention canteen was that at least half of the meals should be healthy labelled. The intervention canteen did not expect the Keyhole certification to increase meal preparation expenses. An employee canteen at another hospital with no immediate plan to become Keyhole certified
Results
Table 2 shows the demographic characteristics of the participants. Comparing the intervention and control canteens at the three measurements none of the tests were statistically significant. Forty-six per cent of all employees in the study were female, the average age was 41 years (SD 12) and average calculated BMI was 24.4 kg/m2 (SD 3.5). On average 41% of participants were medical doctors and health care personnel, the rest being office and administrative personnel, technical staff, etc. On
Discussion
This study shows that the governmental Keyhole certification program, allowing restaurants and canteens to label the healthier meal options, has the potential to improve the nutritional quality of employees’ lunch intake on multiple aspects. Furthermore, the results of the half-year follow-up measurement found that the nutritional improvements of the lunch meals were sustained in the intervention canteen. Intake differed from the control canteen for all the foods and nutrients included in the
References (37)
- et al.
Availability and accessibility of healthier options and nutrition information at New Zealand fast food restaurants
Appetite
(2012) - et al.
Long-term impact of a chef on school lunch consumption. Findings from a 2-year pilot study in Boston middle schools
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
(2012) - et al.
Using photography in ‘The Restaurant of the Future’. A useful way to assess portion selection and plate cleaning?
Appetite
(2013) - et al.
Posting point-of-purchase nutrition information in university canteens does not influence meal choice and nutrient intake
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
(2011) - et al.
An intervention study targeting energy and nutrient intake in worksite cafeterias
Eating Behaviors
(2010) - et al.
Healthy dining. Subtle diet reminders at the point of purchase increase low-calorie food choices among both chronic and current dieters
Appetite
(2013) The relationship between dietary energy density and energy intake
Physiology & Behavior
(2009)- et al.
Influence of placement of a nutrition logo on cafeteria menu items on lunchtime food Choices at Dutch work sites
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
(2011) - et al.
Comparison of three methods to reduce energy density. Effects on daily energy intake
Appetite
(2013) - et al.
Association between eating out of home and body weight
Nutrition Reviews
(2012)
Effects of energy content and energy density of pre-portioned entrees on energy intake
Obesity. (Silver.Spring)
Process evaluation results from an environmentally focused worksite weight management study
Health Education & Behavior
The impact of a workplace catering initiative on dietary intakes of salt and other nutrients. A pilot study
Public Health Nutrition
Explaining the effects of a point-of-purchase nutrition-information intervention in university canteens. A structural equation modelling analysis
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Nutritional challenges and health implications of takeaway and fast food
Nutrition Reviews
Reflections from a systematic review of dietary energy density and weight gain. Is the inclusion of drinks valid?
Obesity Reviews
Making healthy behaviors the easy choice for employees. A review of the literature on environmental and policy changes in worksite health promotion
Health Education and Behavior
Cited by (51)
Don't say “vegan” or “plant-based”: Food without meat and dairy is more likely to be chosen when labeled as “healthy” and “sustainable”
2024, Journal of Environmental PsychologyA meta-analysis on the effectiveness of food-waste reducing nudges
2023, Food PolicyReliability and Validity of Digital Images to Assess Child Dietary Intake in a Quick-Service Restaurant Setting
2023, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and DieteticsEnablers and barriers to healthy eating among hospital nurses: A systematic review
2023, International Journal of Nursing StudiesCitation Excerpt :Aspects of the work environment such as high availability and accessibility of unhealthy foods play a key role in how nurses eat. Interventions to improve the hospital food environment have been widely studied and are implemented through disincentives of unhealthy foods, choice architecture, policy change, point of purchase prompts, increasing healthy options in food outlets and manipulating food prices to increase both the availability and accessibility of healthy foods or a combination of these (Gorton et al., 2010; Liebert et al., 2013; Moran et al., 2016; Simpson et al., 2018; Lassen et al., 2014). These strategies are all supported by the results of the review as several studies identified high accessibility of unhealthy foods, high cost and limited variety of healthy foods impacted nurses' eating behaviour at work (Ross et al., 2019a; Monaghan et al., 2018; Gifkins et al., 2018).
Assessment of food environment at work and its association with cardiometabolic health among employed adults in Delhi, India
2022, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and ReviewsCitation Excerpt :The most common way of eating out of home for working adults is at a worksite food environment. Canteens at worksite provide the main meal of the day, often at subsidized rates but this could also in return harm their health as recent studies have reported that most of the employees are eating out more than five times a week without really acknowledging it [3–5]. Meals at work influence the productivity of the employees and their risk of occupational conditions such as obesity, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer [4,6–9].
- ☆
Acknowledgements: The present study was funded by the Danish Ministry of Family and Consumer Affairs and The Nordic Kitchen, Herlev University Hospital. We thank all those who took part in the project, especially the participants in the survey and all staff and management at the two canteens. We also thank Mette Toftegaard Rasmussen from Copenhagen Hospitality College for valuable contributions to the initial study design and analysis.