Elsevier

Appetite

Volume 55, Issue 3, December 2010, Pages 398-406
Appetite

Research report
Prostate cancer, masculinity and food. Rationales for perceived diet change

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.07.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Research indicating that certain diets can lower prostate-specific antigen levels suggests that diet change might be a beneficial treatment adjunct for low-grade prostate cancer. However, few men with prostate cancer adopt significant diet change, indicating a need to better understand how and why they make food choices. This qualitative study explored men's perceptions of their diets following a prostate cancer diagnosis, and the rationales underpinning diet changes (or lack thereof). Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 men ages 48–78 years who had been diagnosed with prostate cancer within the previous 5 years. Findings show that participants exhibited varied dietary patterns, which we labeled ‘eating as usual’, ‘intensifying efforts’, ‘adding-on’, and ‘overhauling diets’. Four main domains informed rationales for diet changes or lack thereof: perception of pre-prostate cancer diet, diet and health understandings, orientation towards prostate cancer, and the need for “doing something.” Dietary ideals framed as masculine, important, action-oriented and autonomous endeavors contributed to participants’ food choice behaviors, suggesting that their alignment to masculine dietary ideals influenced if and how they engaged in diet change. A better understanding of how masculine food ideals shape food choice might be useful in expanding food choice models and in developing effective nutrition education interventions for this group.

Introduction

Survivorship and lifestyle issues in prostate cancer are gaining increased attention in Western countries as more men are being diagnosed and living longer with this disease (Jemal et al., 2009). The role of nutrition in prostate cancer prevention and recovery has been of increased interest in recent decades due to observations that typical Western eating patterns, high in meat and fat while low in fruit and vegetable consumption, are associated with high incidence and mortality (Sonn, Aronson, & Litwin, 2005). Dietary modifications that decrease meat and fat intake and increase fruit and vegetable consumption have recently been shown to reduce prostate-specific antigen (PSA) markers of disease progression in some men with low-grade prostate cancer (Carmody et al., 2008, Nguyen et al., 2006, Ornish et al., 2005). Although PSA testing is a crude measure of prostate cancer progression, emergent evidence suggests that diet might be a valuable adjunct to conventional treatment(s) for some men with low-grade disease. Reviews of evidence for the protective and therapeutic nature of low-fat plant-based diets and controlling overweight and obesity to improve prostate cancer recovery are also promising (Berkow, Barnard, Saxe, & Ankerberg-Nobis, 2007). Although more definitive studies are needed, many researchers and care providers have argued that the preliminary evidence is compelling enough that these diet factors should be included in prostate cancer nutrition care guidelines (Demark-Wahnefried, 2007). As well, healthy-eating recommendations have been made for prostate cancer patients to prevent or manage co-morbidities such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, common in older men (Moyad, 2004).

As a result of these recommendations and widespread media reports linking diet and prostate cancer management, men and their caregivers have become increasingly interested in nutrition education and dietary modifications (Demark-Wahnefried, Peterson, McBride, Lipkus, & Clipp, 2000). As uptake of screening increases and definitive treatments improve, the number of men diagnosed with and surviving prostate cancer will increase. This will further increase demand for diet information and nutritional services. Therefore health care providers need to make accessible effective nutrition information and services to assist men with prostate cancer to improve their diets. Yet research reveals that few men diagnosed with prostate cancer actually make significant or long-lasting diet changes (Patterson et al., 2003). Additionally, some patients appear willing to sacrifice potential increases in survival time rather than adopt healthier eating patterns (Hopfgarten, Adolfsson, Henningsohn, Onelov, & Steineck, 2006). Together these observations point to the need to better understand how men who have prostate cancer make food choices in order to improve the effectiveness of nutrition education or dietary counseling programs.

Health behavior theories attempt to explain why individuals make food choices by examining complex interactions among multiple health determinants (Glanz, Rimer, & Lewis, 2002). Behavioral determinants of food choice have been conceptualized as individual (physiological, personal and behavioral) and collective (social, cultural, environmental and political) (Furst et al., 1996, Raine, 2005, Wetter et al., 2001). Although gender has been depicted as a health determinant, the ways gender influences diet have not been fully explored in food choice models. Much of the research on gender and food has focused on household food provision and women's food choices (DeVault, 1991), but studies focused on gender and men's food choice processes are scarce. One way gender may influence food choice is by shaping men's food ideals including dietary understandings and healthy-eating perceptions; however, little is known about how this might occur (Paquette, 2005).

Masculinity theory provides a framework for better understanding men's health behaviors, including their dietary knowledge, perceptions, attitudes and food practices. Gender is conceptualized as socially constructed and performed through people's daily activities and social interactions and thus men and women demonstrate masculinities or femininities respectively by embodying and enacting idealized or hegemonic ‘manly’ or ‘womanly’ practices (Connell, 1995, Connell and Messerschmidt, 2005). This can be problematic for men's health because many health promotion practices, including nutritional self-care, are perceived as feminine and as a result men might signify their alignment to hegemonic masculinity by avoiding these and engaging in less healthy ‘manly’ practices (Courtenay, 2000). Few men fully embody hegemonic masculinity and hence multiple masculinities emerge in and around masculine ideals and are shaped by social context (including culture, ethnicity, race, economics and/or sexual orientation). Thus multiple, complex and sometimes contradictory, masculine health and food ideals are found in contemporary Western society.

The few studies that have examined how social constructions of masculinity might be implicated in men's health and dietary behaviors have reported typical masculine ways of describing food as fuel or a necessity to satisfy hunger and ensure bodily performance (Roos et al., 2001, Smart and Bisogni, 2001). A minority of men expressed more feminine diet evaluations such as caring about food and health; however food as health promotion remained framed as women's concerns (Roos and Wandel, 2005, Sellaeg and Chapman, 2008). Cynicism about healthy-eating messages and an overall perception of healthy food as inferior and unsatisfying were identified as barriers to healthy eating for some men (Gough & Conner, 2006). Additionally, some older men's lack of concern about diet and health was attributed to deficient health-literacy, male disinterest in self-care and reliance on female partners for health care (Drummond & Smith, 2006).

Much of this research has focused on healthy and younger men, although recently the importance of maintaining masculine identity in older frail men was implicated in shaping their self-care activities (Moss, Moss, Kilbride, & Rubinstein, 2007). However, no studies have addressed men's perceptions of food and health after a health crisis and specifically in the context of prostate cancer. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to describe men's perceptions of their diets and diet changes in response to their prostate cancer, and illuminate the reasons underpinning diet changes (or lack thereof) in their recovery and self-care.

Section snippets

Methods

The qualitative research design and methodology employed in this study was guided by grounded theory methods, including concurrent data collection and analysis and the use of inductive reasoning to generate theoretical explanations about the processes by which men make diet-related decisions (Strauss & Corbin, 1998). The research utilizes a social constructivist perspective whereby people are understood to create meaning about the world through dynamic social processes. In this sense knowledge

Results

The themes that emerged regarding participants’ understandings of diet, health, self-care and the role of diet in prostate cancer care underpin each participant's personal rationale for changing or not changing his diet on an ongoing basis after diagnosis. Participants described various dietary patterns, which reflected these understandings and represented varied degrees of perceived diet change (or lack thereof). This is illustrated in the ‘Constructing rationales for perceived diet change’

Discussion

Findings from this study add to a growing body of knowledge about food choice and diet change processes by describing a diet change model specifically addressing the experiences of men with prostate cancer. Several other models have presented overviews of food choice processes for healthy adults (Falk et al., 1996, Furst et al., 1996, Sobal and Bisogni, 2009, Wetter et al., 2001) and diet change processes for adults faced with diet-related health crises (Falk et al., 2000, Janas and Bisogni,

References (54)

  • M.A. Moyad

    Improving overall men's health and potentially reducing the risk of certain cancers via serum markers and risk assessment for coronary heart disease

    Urologic Oncology-Seminars and Original Investigations

    (2004)
  • M.A. Moyad

    Step-by-step lifestyle changes that can improve urologic health in men, Part I. What do I tell my patients?

    Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice

    (2006)
  • M.A. Moyad

    Step-by-step lifestyle changes that can improve urologic health in men, Part II. What do I tell my patients?

    Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice

    (2006)
  • J.L. Oliffe et al.

    Men interviewing men about health and illness. Ten lessons learned

    The Journal of Men's Health & Gender

    (2005)
  • D. Ornish et al.

    Intensive lifestyle changes may affect the progression of prostate cancer

    Journal of Urology

    (2005)
  • J. Paisley et al.

    Qualitative investigation of the meanings of eating fruits and vegetables for adult couples

    Journal of Nutrition Education

    (2001)
  • R.E. Patterson et al.

    Changes in diet, physical activity, and supplement use among adults diagnosed with cancer

    Journal of the American Dietetic Association

    (2003)
  • G. Roos et al.

    Men, masculinity and food. Interviews with Finnish carpenters and engineers

    Appetite

    (2001)
  • K. Sellaeg et al.

    Masculinity and food ideals of men who live alone

    Appetite

    (2008)
  • L.R. Smart et al.

    Personal food systems of male college hockey players

    Appetite

    (2001)
  • C.L. Van Patten et al.

    Diet and dietary supplement intervention trials for the prevention of prostate cancer recurrence. A review of the randomized controlled trial evidence

    The Journal of Urology

    (2008)
  • D.E. Bailey et al.

    Watching, waiting and uncertainty in prostate cancer

    Journal of Clinical Nursing

    (2007)
  • S.E. Berkow et al.

    Diet and survival after prostate cancer diagnosis

    Nutrition Reviews

    (2007)
  • K Charmaz

    Constructing grounded theory

    (2006)
  • R.W. Connell

    Masculinities

    (1995)
  • R.W. Connell et al.

    Hegemonic masculinity. Rethinking the concept

    Gender & Society

    (2005)
  • W. Demark-Wahnefried

    Dietary intervention in the management of prostate cancer

    Current Opinion in Urology

    (2007)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Gender relations and couple negotiations of British men's food practice changes after prostate cancer

      2015, Appetite
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such gendered food and eating stereotypes then position men's dietary preferences and practices as being in opposition to healthy eating guidelines which instruct men to eat in what can be framed as ‘feminised’ ways (Gal & Wilkie, 2010). Masculine food and food practice ideals can shape the diets of prostate cancer survivors and might prevent them from eating healthily (Mróz, Chapman, Oliffe, & Bottorff, 2010, 2011b). In contrast, women typically associate food provision as part of their role as a ‘good wife’ or partner and in health care provision for their partners and families (Furst, 1997).

    • A second chance: Meanings of body weight, diet, and physical activity to women who have experienced cancer

      2013, Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Other researchers have reported on felt needs to take responsibility34 and regain control11 as a way to manage stress.35 Similar efforts have been reported among men.36 The dimension of stress and living well centered on emotions such as fear, blame, and distress.

    • Reframing eating during chemotherapy in cancer patients with chemosensory alterations

      2012, European Journal of Oncology Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      These cognitive processes are influenced by life experiences and personal beliefs, values, customs and behaviours (Sobal and Bisogni, 2009) and serve to reframe the eating experience (i.e. look at or think of in a new or different way). While most researchers agree that cancer patients lack appetite and that a number of symptoms impair food intake (Mroz et al., 2010; Bernhardson et al., 2007; Shragge et al., 2007; Hopkinson et al., 2006; Strasser et al., 2008; Orrevall et al., 2005; McQuestion et al., 2010), understanding the influence of beliefs about eating on food intake is limited in the cancer setting. Despite the value of such information, research in this area to date has not used designs appropriate for studying beliefs about eating, nor have researchers provided sufficient demographic, nutritional, or medical detail about the sample (Currow et al., 2009).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text