Original article
The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory: An Evaluation of Its Reliability and Validity for Children With Traumatic Brain Injury

Presented as a poster at the World Injury Conference, June 7, 2004, Vienna, Austria.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.026Get rights and content

Abstract

McCarthy ML, MacKenzie EJ, Durbin DR, Aitken ME, Jaffe KM, Paidas CN, Slomine BS, Dorsch AM, Berk RA, Christensen JR, Ding R, and the CHAT Study Group. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory: an evaluation of its reliability and validity for children with traumatic brain injury.

Objectives

To assess the reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, version 4.0 (PedsQL), and to compare it with that of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) among children with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Design

Prospective cohort study that documented the health-related quality of life of 391 children at 3 and 12 months postinjury.

Setting

Four level I pediatric trauma centers.

Participants

Children (age range, 5–15y) hospitalized with a TBI or an extremity fracture.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Parent-reported PedsQL and BRIEF scale scores.

Results

Both the PedsQL and BRIEF scales showed good internal consistency (PedsQL α range, .74–.93; BRIEF α range, .82–.98) and test-retest reliability (PedsQL r range, .75–.90; BRIEF r range, .82–.92), respectively. Factor analysis revealed that most PedsQL items loaded most highly on their conceptually derived scale. The PedsQL cognitive function scale detected the largest differences among groups of children with varying severities of TBI as well as parents’ assessment of change in cognition postinjury.

Conclusions

Although the reliability of the 2 instruments is comparable, the PedsQL discriminates better among children with TBI. The PedsQL is a promising instrument for measuring the health of children after TBI.

Section snippets

Study Population

Children between the ages of 5 and 15 years who were hospitalized for 1 or more nights at 1 of 4 level I pediatric trauma centers for treatment of a TBI or an extremity fracture were eligible for the Children’s Health After Trauma (CHAT) study. Children with an extremity fracture as well as children with varying severities of a TBI were included in the study to facilitate the validation of the PedsQL and BRIEF scales. We expected there to be differences in the health profiles of children with a

Demographics of the Study Population

At 3 months postinjury, the parents/guardians of 391 (90%) of the 433 enrolled families completed the follow-up interview (median, 97d). Most of the respondents were either the biologic mother (81%) or father (12%). Subjects were more likely to be male (68%), white (70%), with an average age ± standard deviation (SD) of 10.6±3.2 years (table 1). The children were primarily covered by commercial insurance (73%) or medical assistance (26%) at the time of injury. There were no significant

Discussion

The results of our study suggest that the PedsQL is a reliable measure of general health among children who sustain a TBI and/or an extremity fracture. All of the PedsQL and BRIEF scales showed adequate internal consistency reliability for group comparisons. Although most of the BRIEF scales also met the reliability criterion recommended for individual patient scores, only the PedsQL total scale did so. However, all of the PedsQL scales except for physical functioning have fewer items than the

Conclusions

Whereas the reliability of the PedsQL and the BRIEF was comparable, the PedsQL was more sensitive to differences in cognitive function and HRQOL among children hospitalized with different types and severities of TBI. In addition, its brevity and ease of administration make it well-suited for surveillance as well as clinical and survey research. Our results suggest that some of the core PedsQL scales may need refinement to better reflect unique dimensions of HRQOL. For children with cognitive

Acknowledgments

The CHAT Study Group is Melissa McCarthy, ScD, Ellen MacKenzie, PhD, Dennis Durbin, MD, MS, Charles Paidas, MD, Mary Aitken, MD, MPH, Kenneth M. Jaffe, MD, Beth Slomine, PhD, Andrea Dorsch, PhD, James Christensen, MD, Ronald Berk, PhD, Eileen Houseknecht, RN, BSN, Susan Ziegfeld, MSN, CRNP, Vinita Misra Knight, MPH, CSTR, Patricia Korehbandi, Donna Parnell, RN, MNSc, and Pat Klotz, RN, BSN. We thank the dedicated study coordinators who ensured the successful recruitment of all of the injured

References (48)

  • J.A. Janusz et al.

    Social problem-solving skills in children with traumatic brain injurylong-term outcomes and prediction of social competence

    Child Neuropsychol

    (2002)
  • L. Schwartz et al.

    Long-term behavior problems following pediatric traumatic brain injuryprevalence, predictors and correlates

    J Pediatr Psychol

    (2003)
  • J.E. Max et al.

    Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents following traumatic brain injury

    Dev Neuropsychol

    (2004)
  • B. Spilker

    Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials

    (1998)
  • J.M. Landgraf et al.

    The CHQ user’s manual

    (1996)
  • G.W. Torrance et al.

    Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification systemHealth Utilities Index Mark 2

    Med Care

    (1996)
  • R.E. Stein et al.

    Functional status II(R)A measure of child health status

    Med Care

    (1990)
  • M.E. Msall et al.

    The Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM)

    Clin Pediatr

    (1994)
  • S.M. Haley et al.

    Pediatric Evaluation and Disability Inventory (PEDI)development, standardization and administration manual

    (1992)
  • L.H. Daltroy et al.

    The POSNA Pediatric Musculoskeletal Functional Health Questionnairereport on reliability, validity and sensitivity to change

    J Pediatr Orthop

    (1998)
  • B. Starfield et al.

    The adolescent child health and illness profile. A population-based measure of health

    Med Care

    (1995)
  • R.M. Kaplan et al.

    Health statustypes of validity and the index of well-being

    Health Serv Res

    (1976)
  • J.W. Varni et al.

    The PedsQLmeasurement model for the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory

    Med Care

    (1999)
  • J.W. Varni et al.

    The PedsQL 4.0reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations

    Med Care

    (2001)
  • Cited by (136)

    • Quality of life 6 and 18 months after mild traumatic brain injury in early childhood: An exploratory study of the role of genetic, environmental, injury, and child factors

      2020, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Impairments in any of these domains can affect day-to-day functioning, individual well-being and overall satisfaction with life; in other words, they can impact a child’s quality of life ([QoL]; Anderson et al., 2010; Fineblit et al., 2016). QoL is a broad ranging construct that includes school performance, physical, emotional, social as well as health outcomes, and thus captures the effects of mTBI on children’s global functioning and well-being (Brown et al., 2016; McCarthy et al., 2005; Varni et al., 2007). A child’s QoL can be negatively impacted if any of the multiple contributing factors such as family environment, cognitive abilities or biological determinants are disrupted (Beauchamp et al., 2019).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (grant no. R49/CCR319701).

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

    View full text