Elsevier

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Volume 66, Issue 3, September 2015, Pages 222-229.e1
Annals of Emergency Medicine

Pain management and sedation/original research
Intravenous Subdissociative-Dose Ketamine Versus Morphine for Analgesia in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Presented at the New York American College of Emergency Physicians conference, July 2014, Bolton Landing, NY; the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine national conference, May 2014, Dallas, TX; and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Mid-Atlantic regional conference, February 2014, Philadelphia, PA.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.03.004Get rights and content

Study objective

We assess and compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of subdissociative intravenous-dose ketamine with morphine in emergency department (ED) patients.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial evaluating ED patients aged 18 to 55 years and experiencing moderate to severe acute abdominal, flank, or musculoskeletal pain, defined as a numeric rating scale score greater than or equal to 5. Patients were randomized to receive ketamine at 0.3 mg/kg or morphine at 0.1 mg/kg by intravenous push during 3 to 5 minutes. Evaluations occurred at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. Primary outcome was reduction in pain at 30 minutes. Secondary outcome was the incidence of rescue analgesia at 30 and 60 minutes.

Results

Forty-five patients per group were enrolled in the study. The primary change in mean pain scores was not significantly different in the ketamine and morphine groups: 8.6 versus 8.5 at baseline (mean difference 0.1; 95% confidence interval −0.46 to 0.77) and 4.1 versus 3.9 at 30 minutes (mean difference 0.2; 95% confidence interval −1.19 to 1.46; P=.97). There was no difference in the incidence of rescue fentanyl analgesia at 30 or 60 minutes. No statistically significant or clinically concerning changes in vital signs were observed. No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Patients in the ketamine group reported increased minor adverse effects at 15 minutes post–drug administration.

Conclusion

Subdissociative intravenous ketamine administered at 0.3 mg/kg provides analgesic effectiveness and apparent safety comparable to that of intravenous morphine for short-term treatment of acute pain in the ED.

Introduction

The provision of adequate, safe, and timely analgesia is a core component of patient care in the emergency department (ED). Ketamine is a noncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate and glutamate receptor antagonist that decreases central sensitization, “wind-up” phenomena, and pain memory.1, 2 As a phencyclidine-like dissociative agent, ketamine possesses a number of pharmacologic characteristics useful to the emergency physician. At doses commonly used for procedural sedation (1 to 1.5 mg/kg), ketamine produces a trancelike cataleptic state, whereas at subdissociative doses (0.1 to 0.6 mg/kg; most commonly 0.3 mg/kg) it maintains potent analgesic and amnestic effects that are accompanied by preservation of protective airway reflexes, spontaneous respiration, and cardiopulmonary stability.3, 4, 5

Editor’s Capsule Summary

What is already known on this topic

Ketamine is a potent analgesic.

What question this study addressed

Is ketamine more or less effective than morphine in treating acute pain?

What this study adds to our knowledge

In this trial, 90 adults with acute pain were randomized in the emergency department in double-blind fashion to receive either ketamine at 0.3 mg/kg or morphine at 0.1 mg/kg intravenously. Pain score reductions and the proportion of patients with complete pain relief were statistically similar between groups, with reasonable power to exclude clinically important differences. There were no serious adverse events, although ketamine subjects more frequently experienced dizziness and disorientation.

How this is relevant to clinical practice

This small but well-designed trial suggests generally similar analgesic equivalence between ketamine at 0.3 mg/kg and morphine at 0.1 mg/kg intravenously.

In subdissociative doses, ketamine has been shown to confer potent, opioid-sparing effects and to be effective in providing analgesia for pain that is poorly controlled by opioids in a variety of settings outside of the ED.6, 7, 8, 9 Emerging data on the use of subdissociative-dose ketamine as a single agent in out-of-hospital and austere settings, where it has compared favorably to morphine, support a role for ketamine in the analgesic armamentarium of emergency physicians. Two retrospective studies demonstrated that subdissociative-dose ketamine in the dosing range of 0.1 to 0.6 mg/kg, when administered as an adjunct to opioid analgesics, significantly reduced pain reported by patients in the ED.10, 11

In our study, we hypothesize that a subdissociative dose of ketamine administered as a single agent at 0.3 mg/kg will provide relief similar to that of a standard dose of morphine at 0.1 mg/kg for acute moderate to severe pain in the ED setting. The primary outcome used to test our hypothesis is the comparative reduction in participants’ pain scores at 30 minutes from medication administration.

Section snippets

Study Design

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing the safety and efficacy of subdissociative intravenous-dose ketamine with intravenous morphine for acute pain in the ED. This study was approved by the Maimonides Medical Center institutional review board and registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01835262). The study was conducted and is reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Group.12

Study Setting and Selection of Participants

The study facility is a 711-bed community teaching hospital with an

Results

Ninety patients (45 ketamine and 45 morphine) were enrolled in the study. The patients’ mean age was 35 and 36 years, respectively (SD=10 for both groups); 67% and 62% were women, respectively. There were no differences between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics or baseline vital signs, pain scores, or chief complaint (Table 1). The patient flow diagram is illustrated in Figure 1.

As shown in Table 2, patients’ reported pain scores at time 0 were similar in the 2 groups: the mean

Limitations

This was a single-center study in which patients were enrolled as a convenience sample according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sample size was near minimum for adequate power (80%). There was a potential for unblinding because some participants exhibited ketamine-specific reactions such as nystagmus. Patient enrollment was restricted to time frames in which both a member of the research team and pharmacy team were available.

Discussion

Subdissociative ketamine has been shown to mitigate pain and reduce opioid consumption in patients with chronic pain (neuropathic pain), cancer pain, and acute postoperative pain, as demonstrated in the anesthesia and surgical literature.17, 18, 19, 20 There have been several published retrospective studies and prospective trials examining ketamine used for analgesia in ED patients. Lester et al10 evaluated 35 patients who received subdissociative ketamine for analgesia and reported that 19

References (24)

Cited by (100)

View all citing articles on Scopus

Please see page 223 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article.

Supervising editor: Steven M. Green, MD

Author contributions: SM, VC, IP, AL, ES-Z, and CF conceived the study, designed the trial, and obtained research funding. SM, BR, AL, and CF supervised the conduct of the trial and data collection. BR, IP, CM, and VT undertook recruitment of patients and managed the data, including quality control. AL and PH provided statistical advice on study design and data analysis. BR drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. SM takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist and provided the following details: This research was funded, in part, by an unrestricted grant from the New York Department of Health’s Empire Clinical Research Investigator Program.

A feedback survey is available with each research article published on the Web at www.annemergmed.com.

A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.

View full text