Congenital Heart Disease
Relation of Prenatal Diagnosis With One-Year Survival Rate for Infants With Congenital Heart Disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.11.065Get rights and content

Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects (CHDs) is increasingly common, but it is still unclear whether it translates to improved postoperative outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort study of all infants (aged <1 year) who underwent surgery for CHDs from 2006 to 2011 at a single institution. Primary outcomes were in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates. Secondary outcomes were readmission within 30 days of discharge, postoperative length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, unplanned reoperation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use. We used chi-square analyses, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to compare outcomes. Of the 1,642 patients with CHDs, 539 (33%) were diagnosed prenatally. Patients with prenatal diagnoses were of a younger age and less weight at the time of surgery, had greater Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery scores, and were more likely to be white, to have an identified syndrome, or to be born at term. Compared with those diagnosed postnatally, those diagnosed prenatally had a significantly higher unadjusted 1-year mortality rate (11% vs 5.5%, respectively, p = 0.03). Controlling for weight, surgical severity, race, age at surgery, prematurity, and the presence or absence of genetic syndrome, patients with prenatal diagnoses had significantly greater mortality at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio 1.5, p = 0.03), as well as significantly longer intensive care unit and hospital stays. Infants with CHDs diagnosed prenatally had worse outcomes compared with those diagnosed postnatally. Prenatal diagnosis likely captures patients with more severe phenotypes within given surgical risk categories and even within diagnoses and thus may be an important prognostic factor when counseling families.

Section snippets

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study on all infants (aged <1 year at the time of surgery) who underwent surgery for CHDs from January 2006 to December 2011 at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston. Patients were divided into 2 exposure groups: prenatal or postnatal diagnosis. If a patient had >1 surgical hospitalization during the study period, data from the first hospitalization were used.

The primary outcome measure was mortality, both in-hospital and at 1 year of age. Secondary

Results

Of the 1,642 patients who met inclusion criteria, 538 (33%) were diagnosed prenatally. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Infants with prenatal diagnoses were significantly younger and weighed less at the time of surgery than their peers who were diagnosed after birth. African-American and Hispanic patients were more likely to be diagnosed postnatally, whereas white patients were more likely to be prenatally diagnosed. Identified genetic syndromes were significantly more common

Discussion

Contrary to our hypothesis, infants with a prenatal diagnosis of a CHD had worse surgical outcomes compared with those with a postnatal diagnosis, both in terms of 1-year mortality rate and postoperative length of ICU and hospital stay. These differences persisted even after controlling for a variety of factors, including surgical risk category. However, although we could account for differences in severity between surgical risk categories, we could not account for differences in severity within

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (37)

  • Artificial intelligence in three-dimensional and fetal echocardiography

    2023, Intelligence-Based Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery: Artificial Intelligence and Human Cognition in Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Resolution of Postnatal Shock Before Open Heart Surgery in Neonates With Prenatal Diagnoses

    2022, Annals of Thoracic Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    In low-risk categories, PreND has been reported to have no survival benefit.8 With respect to high-risk patients, recent studies pertaining to the PreND of critical CHD after adjusting for severity, according to the Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery, version 1 (RACHS-1) category,4,9,22 showed that PreND patients with higher risk categories (RACHS-1 score ≥4) were more likely to die and undergo unplanned reinterventions,7 which signified that patients who received PreNDs may have higher surgical risks than patients in the same RACHS-1 category who received PostNDs. This study also showed that proportion of the patients with STAT category 5 was higher in group-PreND.

  • Artificial intelligence in echocardiography to diagnose congenital heart disease and fetal echocardiography

    2022, Intelligence-Based Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    The authors of this manuscript are unaware of any commercially available AI software products that have been developed for the assisted detection of CHD lesions. Prenatal screening for CHD can improve neonatal survival, aid in surgical or interventional planning, and enable in utero therapies [36–40]. Similar to 2D and 3D echocardiography, fetal echocardiography requires training in image acquisition and experience in interpretation.

View all citing articles on Scopus

See page 1044 for disclosure information.

View full text