Major article
Risk factors for bloodstream infection caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: A focus on antimicrobials including cefepime

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.02.030Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We conduct a 5-year retrospective case-case-control study at a Detroit hospital.

  • We identify risk factors for bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae.

  • Those predictors include central venous catheter, prior β-lactam therapy, and prior cefepime therapy.

  • Prior antimicrobial therapy was the strongest unique risk factor.

  • Predictor of bloodstream infection caused by nonextended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing pathogens was foley catheter insertion.

Background

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing pathogens represent increasing challenges to physicians because of rising prevalence, high mortality, and challenging treatment. Identifying high risks and early appropriate therapy is critical to favorable outcomes.

Methods

This is a 5-year retrospective case-case-control study performed at the Detroit Medical Center on adult patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by ESBL-producing and non-ESBL–producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae, each compared with uninfected controls. Data were collected from December 2004-August 2009. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression.

Results

Participants included 103 patients with BSI caused by ESBL-producing pathogens and 79 patients with BSI caused by pathogens that did not produce ESBLs. The mean age of patients in the ESBL group was 67 years; of the patients, 51% were men, 77% were black, and 38% (n = 39) died in hospital. The mean age of patients in the non-ESBL group was 58 years; of the patients, 51% were men, 92% were black, and 22% (n = 17) died in hospital. On multivariate analysis, predictors of BSI caused by ESBL-producing pathogens included central venous catheter (odds ratio [OR], 29.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0-288.3), prior β-lactam–/β-lactamase–inhibitor therapy (OR, 28.1; 95% CI, 1.99-396.5), and prior cefepime therapy (OR, 22.7; 95% CI, 2.7-192.4). The only risk factor for BSI caused by non-ESBL–producing pathogens was urinary catheter insertion (OR, 18.2; 95% CI, 3.3-100.3).

Conclusion

Prior antimicrobial therapy, particularly with β-lactam, was the strongest unique risk factor for BSI caused by ESBL-producing E coli or K pneumoniae.

Section snippets

Study design

Two retrospective case-control studies were performed at the Detroit Medical Center (DMC) health care system between December 2004 and August 2009. With >2,200 inpatient beds, the 8- hospital DMC health care system serves as a tertiary referral hospital for Southeast Michigan. Institutional review boards at DMC and Wayne State University approved this study prior to data collection.

Study population

The study population was identified by querying the DMC’s Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, which handles >500,000

Demographics

Of the ESBL BSI cases, 103 were included, including 18 caused by E coli, 84 caused by K pneumoniae, and 1 caused by both E coli and K pneumoniae. There were 103 uninfected controls matched to the ESBL cases. There were 79 susceptible BSI cases, 15 with BSI caused by E coli, and 64 with BSI caused by K pneumoniae, and 79 uninfected controls were matched to these susceptible cases. Information regarding patient demographics, clinical characteristics, outcomes, and prior antibiotic exposure for

Discussion

Although third-generation cephalosporins have been widely recognized as risk factors for ESBL-producing pathogens, this is the first study to our knowledge to identify exposure to cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporin, as a unique and independent predictor for BSI caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Although cefepime has increased activity against and stability to ESBLs compared with third-generation cephalosporins, they are not as active or stable as the carbapenems.

In this

Conclusion

This article demonstrates that, from a hospital formulary perspective, use of cefepime as a workhorse antimicrobial has a similar impact on ESBL risk, as does use of piperacillin-tazobactam. Infection prevention, particularly with regard to central line care, and antimicrobial stewardship efforts geared toward limiting the duration of broad-spectrum empirical agents, including cefepime and BLABLI combinations, are likely to be effective and appropriate methods to prevent and manage infections

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (28)

  • Risk factors and diagnostic markers for Escherichia coli bloodstream infection in older patients

    2021, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Infection with ESBL+ E. coli not only increases the cost of hospitalization, but also prolongs the length of stay (Leistner et al., 2014). In this study, previous exposure to cephems and drainage tube placement were identified as independent risk factors for infection with ESBL+ E. coli, and this is in keeping with previous reports (Chopra et al., 2015; Pascual et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2019). Thus, production of ESBL in E. coli is associated with multiple factors, which mainly include invasive procedures and prior antibiotic exposure.

  • Non-intravenous carbapenem-sparing antibiotics for definitive treatment of bacteraemia due to Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) or AmpC β-lactamase: A propensity score study

    2019, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
    Citation Excerpt :

    In a metanalysis [3], use of empirical quinolones (oral or i.v.) for ESBL Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia was associated with a higher mortality than carbapenems, but mortality was similar when quinolones were used as definitive therapy. Some studies have shown prior exposure to fluoroquinolones or β-lactams to be independent risk factors for ESBL-producing or carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections [31,32]. Taking this into consideration, other non-i.v. treatments such as SXT or fosfomycin could be a better option for definitive therapy.

  • A retrospective analysis of risk factors and outcomes in patients with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli bloodstream infections

    2019, Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
    Citation Excerpt :

    Data from the CHINET Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Program showed that the detection rate of ESBL-producing E. coli in China increased from 38.9% in 2005 to 55.8% in 2014, which is similar to that seen in other countries [2,19]. Previous studies have shown that ESBL-producing E. coli is primarily derived from UTIs, whereas the current study showed abdominal infection to be the primary origin; this may be related to the high number of patients with hepatobiliary surgery in the current hospital [20]. In agreement with previous studies, multivariate analysis of risk factors for ESBL-producing E. coli in the current study showed that UTI was an independent risk factor, with 13.5% of patients having a history of urinary catheterization.

  • Associated factors and clinical outcomes of bloodstream infection due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae during febrile neutropenia

    2019, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
    Citation Excerpt :

    In contrast to other studies [24,25], previous admission, by itself, was not associated with ESBL-positive bacteremia in our cohort. Interestingly, only a few studies suggested the use of CVC during bacteremia to be associated with ESBL infection [26,27]. In our cohort, CVC was an independent risk factor for ESBL-positive bacteremia, although CRBSI was diagnosed in only one patient.

  • Risk factors and molecular epidemiology of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Xiamen, China

    2017, Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
    Citation Excerpt :

    Previous studies have shown that previous use of antibiotics is a risk factor for ESBL-KP infection [14,15]; in particular, patients exposed to third-generation cephalosporins have an increased risk for this infection [2,6,16]. An additional study even revealed that exposure to cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporin, is a unique and independent predictor of ESBL-KP infection [17]. However, some researchers have suggested that the cephalosporin class is not independently associated with ESBL bloodstream infection [18].

View all citing articles on Scopus

Conflicts of interest: None to report.

View full text