ArticlesEngaging the private sector to increase tuberculosis case detection: an impact evaluation study
Introduction
Although free tuberculosis screening and treatment is available through national tuberculosis programmes (NTPs) in most countries, an estimated 1·45 million people die from tuberculosis every year, making it one of the leading infectious causes of adult deaths globally.1 One important reason for this high death toll is inadequate case finding; more than 3 million of the estimated 8·8 million new cases annually are not notified. Many of these cases are either never diagnosed or receive treatment in the private sector.2 Untreated patients continue to transmit tuberculosis and those treated incorrectly can develop drug resistance; in both cases, mortality is high.3
In Asian megacities, 50–80% of symptomatic tuberculosis patients preferentially seek care in the private sector.4, 5, 6, 7 Patients are often unaware of the free services available, perceive government services to be of poor quality, or are deterred by long waiting times and inconvenient hours.8, 9, 10 At both government and private facilities, many tuberculosis cases are missed because suspects are not identified (ie, symptoms are not screened for or not recognised, or a diagnositic test is not requested).11 Although there has been some success in engaging private health providers in Asian cities, persuading these providers to identify, notify to NTPs, and treat tuberculosis cases has been challenging.12, 13, 14
Harnessing the private sector has long been recognised as a missing component in global efforts against tuberculosis.15 It is unlikely that airborne diseases such as tuberculosis will be eliminated without novel approaches to ensure that patients who present in the private sector have access to appropriate diagnostics and free medication. In settings where strict private-sector regulation is unlikely, incentive-based approaches will be necessary to ensure that high-standard tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment become the norm, rather than the exception.
An optimum case-detection strategy for dense urban settings with mixed public and private care providers would need to engage the private sector, be simple to implement and economically scaleable, and yield high numbers of previously unidentified or unreported tuberculosis cases. We sought to measure the effect of a multifaceted tuberculosis case-detection strategy in Karachi, Pakistan.
Section snippets
Study design
We retrospectively assessed a multifaceted case-detection strategy that targeted private health-care facilities within a section of Karachi, by comparing the number of cases notified to the NTP in the intervention area with the number of cases notified in an adjacent section of Karachi, over a 1 year period. The adjacent geographical area was identified as a suitable control population by the NTP and an independent monitoring and evaluation agency, through the TB REACH initiative. The control
Results
Between Jan 3, 2011, and Dec 31, 2011, screeners assessed 388 196 individuals at 54 family clinics and identified 6089 people they suspected to have tuberculosis. Screeners also vetted 81 700 people at the Indus Hospital's outpatient department and identified an additional 2405 (figure 1). These 8494 patients yielded 876 with tuberculosis; 603 were from family clinics and 273 from the outpatient department. Indus Hospital's tuberculosis clinic reported 1020 cases from self-referrals and 520
Discussion
By use of incentive-driven mobile-phone-based mass screening by community laypeople at family clinics, and a mass campaign encouraging self-referral to private facilities, we noted that, in 2011 compared with 2010, the number of case notifications doubled in the intervention area and fell slightly in the control area. We also noted a nearly four-times increase in adult pulmonary tuberculosis cases and more than seven-times increase in paediatric cases at Indus Hospital in 2011 compared with
References (28)
- et al.
Front-line management of pulmonary tuberculosis: an analysis of tuberculosis and treatment practices in urban Sindh, Pakistan
Tuber Lung Dis
(1996) - et al.
A fourth study of case-finding methods for pulmonary tuberculosis in Kenya
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg
(1982) - et al.
Private practitioners and public health: weak links in tuberculosis control
Lancet
(2001) Global tuberculosis control
Engaging all health care providers in TB control. Guidance on implementing public-private mix approaches
- et al.
MDR and XDR—the price of delaying engagement with all care providers for control of TB and TB/HIV
Trop Med Int Health
(2007) - et al.
Health and population sector programme: third service delivery survey. Canadian Institute for Energy Training Canada and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
- et al.
Perceptions of tuberculosis patients about private providers before and after implementation of revised national tuberculosis control programme
Indian J Tuberc
(2009) - et al.
Size and usage patterns of private TB drug markets in the high burden countries
PLoS One
(2011) - et al.
Health seeking and perceived causes of tuberculosis among patients in Manila, Philippines
Trop Med Int Health
(2000)
Adults with chronic cough in urban Bangladesh: healthcare utilization and management of cases by private practitioners
World Health Popul
Role of private sector in providing tuberculosis care: evidence from a population-based survey in India
J Glob Infect Dis
Engaging the private sector for tuberculosis control: much advocacy on a meagre evidence base
Trop Med Int Health
Hard gains through soft contracts: productive engagement of private providers in tuberculosis control
Bull World Health Organ
Cited by (113)
A review of mobile health interventions for public private mix in tuberculosis care
2021, Internet InterventionsCitation Excerpt :Six studies (Velayutham et al., 2015; Lestari et al., 2017; Khan et al., 2012; Chadha et al., 2017; Pande et al., 2017; Ali et al., 2016) reported details about the content of the intervention (Intervention Content). Four studies (Velayutham et al., 2015; Thu et al., 2020; Lestari et al., 2017; Khan et al., 2012) documented the usability/content testing with the participants. Only two studies reported the cost assessment of the intervention (Lestari et al., 2017; Choun et al., 2017), only one study does not report the access of individual participants (Thu et al., 2020).
Quality matters: Redefining child TB care with an emphasis on quality
2019, Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial DiseasesCitation Excerpt :Reframing child TB care from a ‘specialized’ service to a ‘routine, simplified standard-of-care’ service will allow clinicians across the spectrum to be empowered to accurately identify, diagnose and confidently treat child TB, including referrals within the health system when needed. Further, combined with robust active case finding in the community, a successful shift of child TB care from central to peripheral settings promises to dramatically narrow the abysmally large child TB detection gap of nearly 63% and enhance the quality of services [66–69]. The ideal child TB clinic model (Fig. 3) is inspired by a wish list of integrated services that would effectively capitalize upon diagnostic and preventive services currently out of children's grasp.
Exploring stakeholders perspectives on TB contact investigation in Cali, Colombia: a qualitative study
2023, Frontiers in Public Health