Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 46, Issue 3, February 1998, Pages 437-444
Social Science & Medicine

Embodied risk: My body, myself?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00188-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Risk has become a dominant way to interpret who gets sick and why. A distinction has been drawn between two categories of risk: those arising from the environment, and those resulting from an individual's lifestyle. We identify a third category that might be called corporeal or embodied risk which has received little scholarly attention. Embodied risks are so called because they are located in the body of the person said to be “at risk”. Environmental risks are due to something that happens to a person; lifestyle risks occur because of something a person does or does not do, while embodied risks say something about who the person is. To investigate how people experience health risks—especially risks identified as characteristics of their bodies—we conducted detailed interviews with 29 women who were told they had an abnormal Pap smear. All health risks pose problems for people who are diagnosed as “at risk”: They must translate probabilistic statements about populations into terms that have personal meaning; they must cope with uncertainty; they must consider what it means to be in danger of developing an illness even though most have no symptoms; and they must mobilise appropriate surveillance and perhaps risk reduction. However, limiting attention to environmental and lifestyle risk (and the distinction between them) neglects the additional challenges posed by corporeal risks: the simultaneous presence of disease now and the possibility of more consequential disease in the future; the necessity to submit to ongoing medical surveillance; a tendency to exacerbate the cartesian split between body and self; and the absence of medical or popular discourses through which to interpret and respond to embodied risk. We call upon medicine and public health practitioners to work together with people who are at risk to formulate languages and approaches that can reflect both scientific accuracy (as it is currently understood), and the needs of people to integrate health threats into their daily personal lives.

References (42)

  • A.E. Busseniers et al.

    Inflammatory atypia on cervical smears: a diagnostic dilemma for the gynecologist

    Journal of Reproductive Medicine

    (1991)
  • M.J. Campion et al.

    Psychosexual trauma of an abnormal smear

    British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    (1988)
  • S. Cecchini et al.

    Routine colposcopic survey of patients with squamous atypia

    Acta Cytologica

    (1990)
  • A. Codori et al.

    Psychological costs and benefits of predictive testing for Huntington's Disease

    American Journal of Medical Genetics

    (1994)
  • C. Davison et al.

    Lay epidemiology and the prevention paradox: the implication of coronary candidicay for health education

    Sociology of Health and Illness

    (1991)
  • M. Douglas

    Risk as a forensic resource

    Daedalus

    (1990)
  • J. Gabe

    Health, medicine and risk: the need for a sociological approach

  • S. Gifford

    The meaning of lumps: case studies in the ambiguities of risk

  • S. Gregory et al.

    Researching cervical cancer: compromises, practices and beliefs

    Journal of Advances in Health and Nursing Care

    (1992)
  • I. Hacking

    The Taming of Chance

    (1990)
  • R. Hayes et al.

    Increased absenteeism from work after detection and labeling of hypertensive patients

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1978)
  • Cited by (134)

    • Efficacy as safety: Dominant cultural assumptions and the assessment of contraceptive risk

      2021, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Social scientists have identified several categories of risk, including embodied, lifestyle and medical risks. Embodied risks, such as cancer cells or mutated genes, are “risks identified as characteristics of … bodies” (Kavanagh and Broom, 1998, p. 437). Lifestyle risks, such as smoking or sedentariness, are embedded in people's behavior, decisions and priorities, and medical risks are the consequence of medical procedures, treatments or pharmaceuticals (Lupton, 2013).

    • Diagnosing uncertainty: The challenges of implementing medical screening programs for minority sub-populations in Canada

      2020, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Sociologists have explored a range of phenomena associated with the medical screening of target populations (Armstrong and Eborall, 2012). This research has examined how such interventions increase the role of medical surveillance, turning otherwise healthy people into risk subjects (Armstrong, 1995; Kavanagh and Broom, 1998). Scholars have also explored patients' acceptance, ambivalence and resistance to screening practices (Armstrong, 2005; Barker and Galardi, 2011; Bush, 2000; Kavanagh and Broom, 1998).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text