Future uncertainty and socioeconomic inequalities in health: the Whitehall II study
Introduction
Over the past 20 years, against a backdrop of overall declines in mortality rates, analyses of population data have shown that the social gradient in mortality in the United Kingdom (UK) has increased (Acheson, 1998, Shaw, Dorling, Gordon, & Davey Smith, 1999). However, although socioeconomic gradients in various measures of morbidity are well documented (Acheson, 1998, Marmot, et al., 1991, Erens & Primatesta, 1999), there has been relatively little research examining trends in these measures over time. Most of the evidence to date has concentrated mainly on traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease and indicates that socioeconomic differences are static or narrowing (Bartley, Fitzpatrick, Firth, & Marmot, 2000, Iribarren, Luepker, McGovern, Arnett, & Blackburn, 1997, Vartiainen et al., 1998, Bennet, 1995, Osler et al., 2000).
Steep socioeconomic gradients in measures of morbidity and cardiovascular risk factors have long been demonstrated in the Whitehall II study, a longitudinal cohort of white-collar British civil servants, in which socioeconomic position is assessed by grade of employment (Marmot et al., 1991). Over 11 years follow-up of the Whitehall II cohort up to 1998, inequalities in health between those in the lowest employment category and those in the highest have widened slightly and marked increases in the gradient have been documented in minor psychiatric morbidity in both sexes and cholesterol in men (Ferrie, Shipley, Davey Smith, Stansfeld, & Marmot, 2002).
Additionally during the 1980s and 1990s in the UK, patterns of employment, job security and welfare provision associated with the social order since the second world war have undergone and continue to undergo major change. The future, for many people, is less certain than it used to be (Sennett (1994), Hutton (1995) Sennett, 1998).
Two markers of future uncertainty have previously received some attention in relation to health; job insecurity and financial insecurity. Self-perceived job insecurity has been shown to be associated with increased mental and physical ill-health (Platt, Pavis, & Akram, 1998, De Witte, 1999, Ferrie, 2001) and there is evidence from Finland that it is inversely associated with socioeconomic position (Kinnunen & Natti 1994, Lynch, Kaplan, & Salonen, 1997). In addition, job insecurity attributed to workplace closure and downsizing has been shown to be associated with increased psychological morbidity, self-reported ill-health, long spells of sickness absence and health service use (Ferrie, 2001).
A considerable body of work has documented the deleterious effect of unemployment-related financial strain on health, particularly psychological health (Warr, Banks, & Ullah, 1985, Kessler, Blake Turner, & House, 1987, Ensminger & Celentano 1988, Whelan, 1992). However, little work has examined the wider role of financial insecurity. Research to date shows poor financial security to be associated with minor psychiatric morbidity (Romans, Walton, McNoe, Herbison, & Mullen, 1993, Jackson, Iezzi, & Lafreniere, 1997) and weight gain (Gerace & George, 1996).
Data on financial insecurity and on job insecurity for the whole cohort were first collected during Phase 5 (1997–99) of the Whitehall II study. The aims of this paper are to determine socioeconomic gradients in job and financial insecurity in the Whitehall II cohort, and the contribution of these to socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and cardiovascular risk factors at Phase 5.
Section snippets
Participants
The target population for the Whitehall II study was all London–based office staff, aged 35 – 55, working in 20 Civil Service departments. With a response rate of 73%, the final cohort consisted of 10,308: 6895 men and 3413 women (Marmot et al., 1991). Sub–samples of non-responders indicated that approximately 4% of those invited were not eligible for inclusion, suggesting that the true response rate was higher. Although mostly white–collar, respondents covered a wide range of grades from
Results
Data on current employment status was provided by 7197 of those who completed the Phase 5 questionnaire—(Box 1). Overall, just under half of the respondents were still working in the Civil Service. The majority who had left were non-employed, but a sizable minority were employed elsewhere.
Employment grade gradients in morbidity and cardiovascular risk factors: In the whole Phase 5 population steep inverse employment grade gradients were seen for all measures in both sexes (p=0.04 to p<0.001),
Methodological considerations
As employment grade at Phase 1 was used to determine the gradients, our measure of socioeconomic position is not contemporaneous with our morbidity and risk factor measures at Phase 5. Baseline grade was chosen as it is available for all participants, and analyses using last known grade produced findings little different from those using grade at Phase 1 (data not shown). We felt that use of last known grade as the measure of socioeconomic position posed problems. It reflects mobility for those
Acknowledgements
The Whitehall II study has been supported by grants from the Medical Research Council; British Heart Foundation; Health and Safety Executive; Department of Health; National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (HL36310), US, NIH: National Institute on Aging (AG13196), US, NIH; Agency for Health Care Policy Research (HS06516); and the John D and Catherine T MacArthur Foundation Research Networks on Successful Midlife Development and Socio-economic Status and Health.
JF was supported by the Economic and
References (43)
- et al.
Unemployment and psychiatric distressSocial resources and coping
Social Science & Medicine
(1988) - et al.
Predictors of weight increases over 7 years in fire fighters and paramedics
Preventive Medicine
(1996) - et al.
Why do poor people behave poorly?
Variation in adult health behaviours and psychosocial characteristics by stages of the socioeconomic lifecourse. Social Science & Medicine
(1997) - et al.
Health inequalities among British civil servantsThe whitehall ii study
Lancet
(1991) - et al.
Inequalities in death—specific explanations of a general pattern?
Lancet(
(1984) - et al.
Myocardial ischaemia, risk factors and death from coronary heart-disease
Lancet(
(1977) - Acheson, D. (1998). Independent inquiry into inequalities in health (report). London: The Stationery...
- et al.
Social distribution of cardiovascular disease risk factorsChange among men in england 1984–1993
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
(2000) Cardiovascular risk factors in AustraliaTrends in socioeconomic inequalities
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
(1995)The structure of psychological wellbeing
(1969)
The effects of labour market position, job insecurity, and unemployment on psychological health
Job insecurity and psychological well-beingReview of the literature and exploration of some unresolved issues
European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology
The effects of job insecurity on psychological health and withdrawalA longitudinal study
Australian Psychologist
Job and non-job stressors and their moderators
Journal of Occupational Psychology
The psychological effects of unemployment
Psychological Bulletin
Is job insecurity harmful to health?
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Employment status and health after privatisation in white collar civil servantsProspective cohort study
British Medical Journal
Change in health inequalities among British civil servantsThe Whitehall II study
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire
Cited by (95)
Stress, cortisol, and social hierarchy
2020, Current Opinion in PsychologyCitation Excerpt :Several more recent studies have found that lower SES individuals (or those who had lower childhood SES) tend to have a stronger inflammatory response (e.g. pro-inflammatory cytokines) to social stress [26–29], which can be detrimental to health if chronic [30]. The relationship between SES and well-being appears to be due to several factors associated with low SES such as diminished job control [31] and diminished financial security [32]. Research on SES and cortisol has focused on diurnal cortisol (i.e. the shape of the cortisol response across a full day), finding that low-SES individuals show the pattern typically associated with chronic uncontrollable stressors — a flatter diurnal slope [6,33].
Financial Stress and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in the Jackson Heart Study
2019, American Journal of Preventive MedicineDepression subtyping based on evolutionary psychiatry: Proximate mechanisms and ultimate functions
2018, Brain, Behavior, and ImmunityUnderstanding socio-economic inequalities in food choice behaviour: Can Maslow's pyramid help?
2015, British Journal of NutritionHuman biology and the study of precarity: How the intersection of uncertainty and inequality is taking us to new extremes
2024, American Journal of Human Biology