PROGRAM INTEGRITY IN PRIMARY AND EARLY SECONDARY PREVENTION: ARE IMPLEMENTATION EFFECTS OUT OF CONTROL?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00043-3Get rights and content

Abstract

We examined the extent to which program integrity (i.e., the degree to which programs were implemented as planned) was verified and promoted in evaluations of primary and early secondary prevention programs published between 1980 and 1994. Only 39 of 162 outcome studies featured specified procedures for the documentation of fidelity. Of these, only 13 considered variations in integrity in analyzing the effects of the program. Lowered adherence to protocol was often associated with poorer outcome. There was mixed evidence of dosage effects. The omission of integrity data, particularly measures of adherence, may compromise the internal validity of outcome studies in the prevention literature. We do not view procedures for integrity verification as inconsistent with the adaptation of interventions to the needs of receiving communities.

Section snippets

THE IMPORTANCE OF INTEGRITY VERIFICATION IN PREVENTION RESEARCH

The verification of program integrity is of particular importance in research into preventive interventions, which are often implemented in conditions that present numerous obstacles to fidelity in program delivery. Prevention researchers, who must often contend with limitations in resources, frequently work with numerous paraprofessionals or lay-professional volunteers as service providers in order to minimize cost and achieve a broad dispersion of preventive services (Institute of Medicine,

THE PROMOTION OF PROGRAM INTEGRITY

Program fidelity has been enhanced through the provision of training manuals (Schinke et al., 1985), the training of facilitators (Connel et al., 1985; Perry et al., 1990; Ross et al., 1991) and the supervision of implementors (Harchik et al., 1992; Peterson et al., 1988). Training manuals with clear descriptions of the activities to be implemented are a key to the promotion of program integrity (Blakely et al., 1987; Dobson and Shaw, 1984; Kazdin, 1986), as well as to its verification and the

THE FIDELITY/ADAPTATION DEBATE

Opinions differ as to the feasibility and desirability of promoting and verifying program integrity in prevention research. Some authors oppose the adaptation of specified program activities by personnel at adopting sites because they believe that program efficacy would be compromised by such changes (Boruch and Gomez, 1977; Calsyn et al., 1977). However, this position may be untenable. The tight prescriptions of program models, often developed without full knowledge of the needs and conditions

THE PRESENT STUDY

According to many sources, the promotion and verification of program integrity should be an important facet of prevention research. However, the prevalence of these features in prevention research has not been examined. Previous reviews of integrity verification practices have focused on school-based behavioral interventions (Gresham et al., 1993), parent-training programs (Rogers-Weise, 1992), outcome studies in clinical psychology, behavior therapy, psychiatry, marital and family therapy (

Verification and Promotion of Program Integrity in the Prevention Literature

As Table 1 illustrates, verification of program integrity appeared in a minority of studies evaluating the outcome of preventive interventions. Promotion of program integrity, however, was somewhat more common. Manuals and training were provided to implementors in slightly more than half of the studies considered; supervision of service providers was indicated in somewhat less than half. However, manuals, training and supervision were provided together in only one fifth of the outcome

DISCUSSION

As described above, the majority of studies in the prevention literature contain no indications of the adequacy of program delivery, or of the number of subjects that participated in a satisfactory proportion of planned sessions. The internal validity of much of the outcome research in this literature may be compromised by these omissions.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a research grant awarded to the second author by the Health Canada Strategic Fund for Children's Mental Health.

References (50)

  • R.R Boruch et al.

    Sensitivity, bias, and theory in impact evaluation

    Professional Psychology

    (1977)
  • G.J Botvin et al.

    Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal cognitive-behavioral approach: Results of a 3 year study

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1990)
  • G.J Botvin et al.

    A skills training approach to smoking prevention among Hispanic youth

    Journal of Behavioral Medicine

    (1989)
  • G.J Botvin et al.

    Smoking prevention among urban minority youth: Assessing effects on outcome and mediating variables

    Health Psychology

    (1992)
  • R Calsyn et al.

    Incomplete adoption of an innovation: The case of goal attainment scaling

    Evaluation

    (1977)
  • D.B Connel et al.

    Summary of findings of the school health education evaluation: Health promotion, effectiveness, implementation and costs

    Journal of School Health

    (1985)
  • L.E Datta

    Damn the experts and full speed ahead: An examination of the study of federal programs supporting educational change, as evidence against directed development for local problem solving

    Evaluation Review

    (1981)
  • K.S Dobson et al.

    The use of treatment manuals in cognitive therapy: Experience and issues

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1984)
  • R.E Drake et al.

    Process evaluation in the Washington, DC, Dual Diagnosis Project

    Alcohol Treatment Quarterly

    (1993)
  • Elias, M.J., & Clabby, J.F. (1992). Building social problem solving skills: Guidelines from a school-based program. San...
  • R.D Felner et al.

    The parenting partnership: The evaluation of a human service/corporate workplace collaboration for the prevention of substance abuse and mental health problems and the promotion of family and work adjustment

    Journal of Primary Prevention

    (1994)
  • R.D Felner et al.

    Ecological interventions and the process of change for prevention: Wedding theory and research to implementation in real world settings

    American Journal of Community Psychology

    (1991)
  • D.C Gottfredson et al.

    Managing adolescent behavior in a multi-year, multi-school study

    American Educational Research Journal

    (1993)
  • F.M Gresham

    Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral intervention

    School Psychology Review

    (1989)
  • F.M Gresham et al.

    Treatment integrity of school-based behavioral intervention studies: 1980–1990

    School Psychology Review

    (1993)
  • Cited by (1042)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text