Short report
Bed occupancy and overcrowding as determinant factors in the incidence of MRSA infections within general ward settings

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6701(03)00153-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) incidence and bed occupancy rates at St Luke's Hospital, Malta, were assessed over a 24-month period. A significant positive correlation was established (r=0.463;P<0.05) between new cases of MRSA infections and overall levels of bed occupancy. This would imply that overcrowding may be a relevant factor in MRSA spread within hospitals, even in non-intensive care settings.

Introduction

There are an increasing number of studies that indicate a relationship between the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the hospital setting and levels of staffing amongst healthcare workers, in particular nursing personnel.1 The body of evidence towards this relationship appears to have been accumulated mainly from studies in intensive care environments, both adult2 and paediatric.3 However, there is little information as to whether the same relationship also applies in the non-intensive care settings of general hospital wards.4

Section snippets

Methods

St Luke's Hospital is the only tertiary care facility in Malta, a country having a population of 375 000. The hospital is a 900-bed facility with most general wards incorporating mainly four and eight-bedded bays with larger areas partitioned into two-bedded bays. Single rooms with en-suite facilities are rare. Because of its unique status in the country, and therefore the inability to cap the number of admissions at any one time, St Luke's Hospital experiences significant fluctuations in bed

Results

Over the 24 months of the study an average of 41.7 new cases of MRSA was reported per month (range: 17–61) with a mean monthly bed occupancy rate of 76.3% (range: 73–86%). A significant positive correlation (Figure 2) was established between the bed occupancy rates per month and the number of new MRSA cases identified (r=0.463;P<0.05). Conversely, no statistically significant relationship could be ascertained between MRSA incidence and length of stay per month—mean 7.2 days (range: 4.7–8.6

Discussion

A correlation between workload indices and hospital-acquired infections has been demonstrated in several studies. Vicca showed that nurse understaffing contributed significantly to the spread of MRSA in an adult intensive care setting.2 Mathematical modelling has identified relative staff deficit to be significantly associated with likely transmission of MRSA.5 Fridkin et al. demonstrated that when the patient:nurse ratio in the surgical intensive care unit increased above a certain threshold

Acknowledgements

I thank the Department of Health Information (Malta) for providing bed occupancy and stay data, Ms Elizabeth Scicluna for her epidemiological input and Prof. B. D. Cookson (PHLS Central Public Health Laboratory, London, England) for his helpful suggestions.

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (92)

  • Superintendence of antimicrobial resistance observed in bacterial flora isolated from human faecal carriage in Vellore, India

    2017, Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    Worldwide, there are increasing problems with multiresistant bacteria. The most important drug resistance today is caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (Udo et al., 2001; Borg, 2003), vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) (Calfee et al., 2003; Kuriyama et al., 2003) and Enterobacteriaceae with extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL). The common aerobic pathogens isolated from the chronic wounds are S. aureus, coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CONS), S. epidermidis and Streptococcus spp.

  • What's trending in the infection prevention and control literature? From HIS 2012 to HIS 2014, and beyond

    2015, Journal of Hospital Infection
    Citation Excerpt :

    The question of whether all patients should be given a single room was the subject of a recent BMJ debate.38 Single rooms are associated with lower rates of healthcare-associated infection, some patients report high levels of satisfaction, and the reduction in interruptions during patient contact leads to fewer ‘mix-up’ errors.39–45 On the other hand, caring for patients in multi-occupancy bays is associated with a reduced risk of adverse events, patients in single rooms often report less social contact and feelings of isolation, and bays require a lower staffing ratio.45–49

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text