Study on lifestyle-intervention and impaired glucose tolerance Maastricht (SLIM): design and screening results

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8227(03)00067-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The study on lifestyle-intervention and impaired glucose tolerance Maastricht (SLIM) is a 3 years randomised clinical trial designed to evaluate the effect of a combined diet and physical activity intervention program on glucose tolerance in a Dutch population at increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes. Here the design of the lifestyle-intervention study is described and results are presented from the preliminary population screening, conducted between March 1999 and June 2000. In total, 2820 subjects with an increased risk of having disturbances in glucose homeostasis (i.e. age >40 years and BMI>25 kg/m2 or a family history of diabetes) underwent a first oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Abnormal glucose homeostasis was detected in 826 subjects (30.4%): 226 type 2 diabetes (type 2DM, 8.3%), 215 impaired fasting glucose (IFG, 7.9%) and 385 impaired glucose tolerance (IGT, 14.2%). Both increasing age and BMI were strongly related to the prevalence of IGT and diabetes. After a second OGTT, 114 subjects with glucose intolerance and in otherwise good health were eligible for participation in the intervention study (SLIM). The high prevalence of disturbances in glucose homeostasis observed in the preliminary screening underscore the importance of early (lifestyle) interventions in those at risk for developing diabetes. SLIM will address this topic in the Dutch population.

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is rapidly becoming one of the main health issues in the 21st century. Prevalence has increased explosively in the last two decades, and global estimates indicate a further rise from a current 150 million people with diabetes, to 300 million in 2025 [1], [2]. Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is the obligatory transition state preceding type 2 diabetes. Prevalence of IGT varies widely between populations, from as low as 2.0% in rural populations to more than 20% in high-risk populations [3]. The cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes in subjects with IGT ranged from 3.6 to 8.7% per year in six prospective studies [4], and is strongly related to the fasting and the 2-h plasma glucose concentrations at the time of IGT recognition [4], [5]. The most important modifiable risk factor for progression from IGT to diabetes is obesity. Body mass index (BMI) at the time of IGT recognition is a strong predictor of progression, independently of fasting and 2-h blood glucose concentrations [4]. Dietary factors, especially a high fat intake, are also related to the risk of conversion from IGT to diabetes [6].

Several recent studies have reported the feasibility and efficacy of interventions to prevent or delay the progression to type 2 diabetes in subjects with IGT [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Acarbose, [13], as well as metformin [12], have been shown to reduce the incidence of diabetes in a population with IGT. Other studies have focused on the potential of lifestyle changes to reduce the progression rate from IGT to type 2 diabetes. The Finnish diabetes prevention study (DPS) [11] and the US diabetes prevention program (DPP) [12] reported that weight-loss, changes in dietary intake, and increased physical activity resulted in a 58% reduction in the incidence of diabetes after a mean follow-up of only 3 years. Moreover, lifestyle-intervention was much more effective in reducing the incidence of diabetes than pharmacological intervention (i.e. metformin) [12]. It is important to confirm these observations in different populations, with a different dietary and physical activity background, and a different attitude towards changing lifestyle-habits.

The study on lifestyle-intervention and impaired glucose tolerance Maastricht (SLIM) is a 3 years randomised clinical trial designed to evaluate the effect of a combined diet and physical activity intervention program on glucose tolerance in a Dutch population at increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, we will consider changes in anthropometric measurements, aerobic capacity and cardiovascular risk factors. Additional measurements will be performed in subgroups of the study population in a search for underlying mechanisms.

The objective of this report is to describe the design of the lifestyle-intervention study and to evaluate the results of the preliminary population screening, from which the subjects were recruited for the intervention study. Data are presented about the prevalence of disturbances in glucose homeostasis in a middle-aged Dutch population.

Section snippets

Study design and methods

SLIM is designed to study whether a diet/physical activity intervention program can improve glucose tolerance in subjects with a high risk for developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. The total duration of the study is 3 years. The medical ethical review committee of Maastricht University approved the study protocol, and all subjects gave their written informed consent before the start of the study.

Results

In total 6108 subjects were invited to participate in the preliminary screening. Of those, 2820 subjects were willing to participate in this first OGTT. Non-response was observed in 3288 cases (53.8%). Mean age of the non-responders was 55.7±0.1 years, which was significantly lower than the responders (n=2820; age 56.8±0.1; P-value<0.001). No difference was seen in gender between responders and non-responders (50.6 male vs. 50.9% male, respectively, P=ns). After considering the selection

Lifestyle-intervention

The justification of lifestyle-intervention studies is that they may prevent or postpone the onset of type 2 diabetes and related complications. Both the Finnish DPS and the US DPP reported that changing dietary and physical activity habits reduce the incidence of diabetes by about 58% [11], [12]. Confirmation of these results in different populations is important. SLIM will consider this in a middle-aged Dutch population at increased risk for diabetes. The Dutch population has a low prevalence

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Rob van Dam, Tanja Hermans-Limpens, and Ilse Nijs for their work during the preliminary screening. This study is supported by grants from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (ZonMW: 940-35-034) and the Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation (DFN: 98.901).

References (36)

  • J.L. Chiasson et al.

    Acarbose for prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the STOP-NIDDM randomised trial

    Lancet

    (2002)
  • G. Li et al.

    Effects of insulin resistance and insulin secretion on the efficacy of interventions to retard development of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the DA Qing IGT and Diabetes Study

    Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract.

    (2002)
  • H. King et al.

    Global burden of diabetes, 1995–2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections

    Diabetes Care

    (1995)
  • P. Zimmet et al.

    Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic

    Nature

    (2001)
  • N. Unwin et al.

    Impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glycaemia: the current status on definition and intervention

    Diabetic Med.

    (2002)
  • S.L. Edelstein et al.

    Predictors of progression from impaired glucose tolerance to NIDDM: an analysis of six prospective studies

    Diabetes

    (1997)
  • F. de Vegt et al.

    Relation of impaired fasting and postload glucose with incident type 2 diabetes in a Dutch population: the Hoorn Study

    J. Am. Med. Assoc.

    (2001)
  • J.A. Marshall et al.

    Dietary fat predicts conversion from impaired glucose tolerance to NIDDM. The San Luis Valley Diabetes Study

    Diabetes Care

    (1994)
  • K.F. Eriksson et al.

    Prevention of type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus by diet and physical exercise. The 6-year Malmo feasibility study

    Diabetologia

    (1991)
  • R.C. Page et al.

    Can life-styles of subjects with impaired glucose tolerance be changed? A feasibility study

    Diabetic Med.

    (1992)
  • D.M. Bourn et al.

    Impaired glucose tolerance and NIDDM: does a lifestyle intervention program have an effect

    Diabetes Care

    (1994)
  • X.R. Pan et al.

    Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study

    Diabetes Care

    (1997)
  • J. Tuomilehto et al.

    Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (2001)
  • W.C. Knowler et al.

    Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (2002)
  • R.M. van Dam et al.

    Parental history of diabetes modifies the association between abdominal adiposity and hyperglycemia

    Diabetes Care

    (2001)
  • World Health Organization, Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus, Report of a WHO Consultation....
  • J. Eriksson et al.

    Prevention of Type II diabetes in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance: the Diabetes Prevention Study (DPS) in Finland. Study design and 1-year interim report on the feasibility of the lifestyle intervention programme

    Diabetologia

    (1999)
  • American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand, The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and...
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text