Continuity of care in diabetes: to whom does it matter?
Introduction
Over the past few decades, general practice has changed with the advent of increased competition, more stringent government control and the demand for faster patient throughput to keep general practice economically viable. While general practitioners remain the best placed health professional to take an overall view of the health of person with chronic disease, it takes a great deal of time to care for these patients. These combined factors mean that the provision of best practice medicine is not easy to accommodate within a single appointment. In this pressured environment, continuity of care becomes an important issue. This is especially so for patients with a chronic disease such as diabetes, as they require ongoing monitoring of glycaemic, lipid and blood pressure control and adjustment of medication to deter the development or slow the progression of diabetes complications. A study in our area in the late 1980s found that as many as 31% of people with diabetes attend more than one general practitioner; some attending as many as three or four different practices [1]. We have since taken every opportunity to emphasise to patients the importance of continuity of care. In light of this, it is important to assess the current status. We therefore sought to compare the demographic profile and clinical outcomes of patients attending one versus multiple general practitioners. The profiles of patients who had recently changed their general practitioner, compared to patients under longer term care of their general practitioner were also examined.
Section snippets
Clinical assessment
In the system of diabetes care provided by the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Diabetes Centre, patients are referred by general practitioners for clinical assessment, including assessment of diabetic complications. For the purpose of this study, all data were collected on a standardised assessment form. Venous blood was taken for measurement of HbA1c, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides. A spot sample of urine was collected and assayed for urinary albumin and urinary protein. Two
Single versus multiple general practitioners
Most patients (87.7%) attended only one general practitioner and had been under the care of the referring doctor for a median of 6.2 years (IQR: 2.3–12.1). Interestingly, all patients with Type 1 diabetes were under the care of single versus multiple general practitioners (Table 1). As seen in Table 1, patients who reported attending only one general practitioner were older (median of 59.9 years vs 54.0 years; P=0.02) but were comparable with those attending multiple general practitioners in
Discussion
Within the Australian health system patients are relatively free to move around to seek medical care. While some patients like to develop a relationship with their doctor over time, many frequently change their general practitioner or regularly attend more than one general practitioner for the same health problem [4]. The perception that many patients with diabetes shop around for a doctor was confirmed by a study in our area in the late 1980's [1]. The finding from the current study that the
References (8)
- et al.
Interaction between diabetic patients, their general practitioners and a hospital diabetic clinic
Med. J. Aust.
(1991) - Number Cruncher Statistical System 97 [computer program]. Kaysville (Utah),...
- et al.
- Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services. General Practice in Australia: 1996. Canberra (ACT):...
Cited by (24)
Poor metabolic and blood pressure control in patients with diabetic retinopathy attending a tertiary ophthalmic hospital in Australia
2008, Diabetes Research and Clinical PracticeCitation Excerpt :Regarding metabolic control, we found that only half (54%) of this sample had a HbA1c measurement recorded in their charts, indicating that this measure was not used routinely as part of the diabetes management. Whilst the relationship between diabetic complications and continuity of care is easier to maintain in patients with uncomplicated management of diabetes, Overland et al. showed that in older, more complicated patients treatment regimes are often outside the primary carer's domain and so there is a greater dependency on specialist practitioners such as ophthalmologists [22]. Additionally, among those with HbA1c measurement, the WHO guidelines recommending a HbA1c level of <7% was attained in only 14% of the sample.
Contraception in diabetic women: An Italian study
2005, Diabetes Research and Clinical PracticeWhen is caring sharing? Primary care provider interdependence and continuity of care
2023, Journal of the American Academy of Physician AssistantsSelf-efficacy remains a vital factor in reducing the risk of dialysis in type 2 diabetes care
2021, Medicine (United States)Prioritizing community-based intervention programs for improving treatment compliance of patients with chronic diseases: Applying an analytic hierarchy process
2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health