Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 354, Issue 9172, 3 July 1999, Pages 26-29
The Lancet

Articles
Behavioural management in nursing and residential homes: a randomised controlled trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08237-3Get rights and content

Summary

Background

As more and more elderly people are being cared for in residential and nursing homes, how best can their psychiatric needs be met? We report on evaluation of a behavioural intervention by an old-age psychiatry hospital outreach team.

Methods

This randomised controlled trial of a training and education intervention over 6 months was done in south Manchester, UK. 12 matched nursing and residential homes were randomised to the control or intervention group and within each, the staff selected 10 residents whose behavioural problems made them difficult to care for. Care staff in the intervention homes attended seminars from the hospital outreach team and received weekly visits from a psychiatric nurse to assist in developing care planning skills. The main outcome measures were cognitive impairment and depression, behavioural disturbance, and functional ability, assessed by the geriatric mental state schedule, Crichton Royal behaviour rating scale, and Barthel index, respectively.

Findings

Residents in the intervention group had significantly improved scores for depression (before-and-after change difference −0·5 [95% CI −0·8 to −0·1]) and for cognitive impairment (−0·7 [−1·1 to −0·2]) but not for behaviour rating or Barthel index.

Interpretation

Elderly residents can benefit from improved quality of care achieved by training from a hospital outreach team.

Introduction

In the UK, the move towards community-based care has resulted in substantial changes in the provision of long-term care facilities for elderly people. The decrease in numbers of long-stay NHS beds has been countered by a rise in the number of highly dependent elderly people in other care settings.1 Psychiatric morbidity and physical disability are increasing in independent nursing and residential homes, as is the prevalence of dementia.2, 3, 4, 5 Staff in nursing and residential homes receive minimal training in caring for individuals whose needs might have warranted hospital admission in the past.2 The poor quality of life for elderly residents is well known, with many accounts of poor care standards and rigid institutional regimens.6, 7

In the future, with increasing demand and restricted resources, improvement must occur in standards of staff training, facilities, frequency of specialist advice, and support provided to nursing and residential homes.8 This improvement is unlikely to occur while suitable medical and nursing skills are concentrated in hospitals.3 A reappraisal is needed of the way in which resources and skills are used if there are to be any positive changes in the quality of care. Despite this, little research has been done in the UK to assess the effects of support services on the quality of care in nursing and residential homes. We assessed the effect of an old-age psychiatry outreach team on quality of care by means of a randomised controlled trial.

Section snippets

Recruitment

Our study took place in nursing and residential homes in south Manchester, UK. Full ethical approval was obtained for the project, and consent was obtained from the residents and their relatives. Ten residential homes and two nursing homes participated, and were paired according to size and accreditation status. Computer-generated random numbers were used independently of the researchers to assign one of each pair of homes to the intervention or control group. Ten residents in each home were

Baseline characteristics

120 residents were recruited to the study (figure), 60 in each study group. 105 (87·5%) remained at the 6-month follow-up assessment. 11 residents had died, one had been transferred to hospital, one had been moved to a nursing home, and two had withdrawn consent. Six of the residents lost to follow-up were in the intervention group, and nine were in the control group. Five of the nine controls who did not complete the study were from the same home. After adjustment for clustering effects, the

Discussion

Our main finding was that with a focused intervention, residents were responsive to the intervention used by staff to achieve their goal plans. In weekly sessions over 6 months, staff could be trained to develop skills in assessment and care planning, to implement the programme in everyday care, and to assess the efficacy of the programme in terms of effects on the ways residents functioned. This result is similar to those of Dean, Briggs, and Lindesay17 in their assessment of the effects of

References (16)

  • M Campbell Stern et al.

    Residential care for elderly people: a decade of change

    BMJ

    (1993)
  • D Wilkin et al.

    The implications of managing confused and disabled people in non-specialist residential homes for the elderly

    Health Trends

    (1982)
  • D Wilkin et al.

    Changes in behavioural characteristics of elderly populations of local authority homes and long stay hospital wards

    BMJ

    (1978)
  • D Ames et al.

    Psychiatric illness in elderly residents of part III homes in one London borough: prognosis and review

    Age Ageing

    (1988)
  • C Godlove et al.

    Time for action: an observational study of elderly people in four different care environments.

    (1982)
  • D Willcocks et al.

    Private lives in public places: a research based critique of residential life in local authority old people's homes.

    (1987)
  • R Clough et al.

    Independent review of residential care for the elderly.

    (1987)
  • C Barrowclough et al.

    Goal planning with elderly people: making plans to meet individual needs: a manual of instruction.

    (1986)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (108)

  • Shouting in dementia

    2015, Presse Medicale
  • A new simple score (ABS) for assessing behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia

    2015, Journal of the Neurological Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    Among them, mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Hasegawa Dementia Score-Revised (HDS-R) are common for screening general cognitive function [2,3]. As for BPSD, behavioral pathology in AD (Behave-AD) was proposed at year 1987 [4], Crichton Geriatric Behavioral Rating Scale (CGBRS) at year 1989 [5,6], Dementia Behavior Disturbance Scale (DBDS) at year 1990 [7], neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI) at year 1994 [8], and Troublesome Behavior Scale (TBS) at year 1994 [9]. Although these previous BPSD scores are well established, all of them were designed for detailed examination and thus usually take time.

  • A systematic review of staff training interventions to reduce the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia

    2013, Ageing Research Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    These designs require a higher sample size to be adequately powered and the analysis needs to adjust for clustering effects. Only three studies adjusted for these effects in their sample size calculation (Chenoweth et al., 2009; Fossey et al., 2006; Proctor et al., 1999) or their analysis (Chenoweth et al., 2009; Fossey et al., 2006; Teri et al., 2005). Meanwhile, some of the staff measures may not have been sensitive enough to detect change, or the nature of the change may have been somewhat abstract or difficult to assess with the available quantitative measures.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text