ArticlesEffectiveness of a large-scale distribution programme of free nicotine patches: a prospective evaluation
Introduction
The use of tobacco kills about 5 million people worldwide every year.1 If present patterns continue, it will cause 10 million deaths yearly by 2025.1 Although prevention of smoking initiation is important, increased cessation will provide rapid health benefits. The benefits of giving up smoking are well documented,2 and more than 70% of smokers in the USA are interested in stopping, with roughly half trying to quit each year.3 Of these, most attempt to stop smoking without counselling or medication.4 As a result, only 7% successfully stop smoking for a year or more.5 Universal access to effective treatment of tobacco dependence could prevent millions of premature deaths.6, 7
Smokers who use nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) are 1·5 to 2 times more likely to quit than those who do not use such treatment.5, 8 Improved management of tobacco dependence in clinical settings5, 7 is a strategy used to improve use of NRT and other effective treatments. Insurance coverage of NRT can increase both use of this treatment and stopping rates among smokers.9 However, since many smokers will not be reached by cessation treatment offered in clinical settings, provision of free NRT outside the health-care system is a complementary and potentially effective strategy.10, 11, 12, 13
In 2003, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYC DOHMH), in collaboration with the New York State Department of Health and the Roswell Park Cancer Institute, undertook a large-scale distribution programme of free NRT. The programme was done in the context of rises in city and state cigarette taxes, implementation of smoke-free workplace regulations that covered virtually all establishments (including restaurants and bars), public anti-smoking messages focused on the health risks of second-hand smoke, and promotion of tobacco cessation in clinical practice through education of physicians citywide. Our aim was to help people to stop smoking and to assess the effectiveness of the programme.
Section snippets
Intervention
On April 2, 2003, the NYC DOHMH announced the availability of free 6 week courses of NRT patches to the first 35 000 eligible smokers to call the New York State Smokers' Quitline. All major metropolitan newspapers and television and radio stations reported the programme launch. Neighbourhood-specific media and promotional efforts were used to reach populations with the highest prevalence of heavy smokers. Call volume overwhelmed available response lines in the first days of the programme. From
Results
Of the people in the random sample, about 60% of NRT recipients participated in the 6-month follow-up survey (figure); of these, 966 (74%) were interviewed 24–33 weeks (median 29 weeks) after their intake call, and 339 (26%) returned completed questionnaires 28–39 weeks (median 33 weeks) after their intake call. Of non-respondents, 793 (94%) could not be reached, 34 (4%) were ineligible to participate in the programme or submitted incomplete surveys, and 18 (2%) refused to participate. Of the
Discussion
Our findings show the feasibility and effectiveness of a large-scale programme that used existing telephone helplines to screen smokers for NRT eligibility and to post a full course of free NRT patches directly to those who were eligible, reaching an estimated 5% of all heavy smokers in New York City in a 6-week period. On the conservative assumption that all the non-respondents to our follow-up survey sample continued to smoke, one in five NRT recipients, more than 6000 New Yorkers (about 1%
References (34)
- et al.
The tobacco atlas
(2002) The health benefits of smoking cessation: a report of the Surgeon General
Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health
(1990)Cigarette smoking among adults: United States, 1995
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
(1997)- et al.
Smoking cessation with and without assistance: a population-based analysis
Am J Prev Med
(2000) - et al.
Treating tobacco use and dependence: clinical practice guideline
(June 2000) - et al.
Preventing 3 million premature deaths and helping 5 million smokers quit: a national action plan for tobacco cessation
Am J Public Health
(2004) Recommendations regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke
Am J Prev Med
(2001)- et al.
Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation (Cochrane Review)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
(2004) - et al.
Variations in treatment benefits influence smoking cessation: results of a randomized controlled trial
Tob Control
(2001) - et al.
The use of nicotine patches with minimal intervention
Prev Med
(2000)
Subsidised nicotine replacement therapy
Tob Control
Helping Wisconsin women quit smoking: a successful collaboration
Wis Med J
Real-world efficacy of prescription and over-the-counter nicotine replacement therapy
Addiction
Measures of abstinence in clinical trials: issues and recommendations
Nicotine Tob Res
Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey questionnaire
New York City community health atlas
Introduction to contemporary statistical methods
Cited by (163)
Quitline Promotion to Medicaid Members Who Smoke: Effects of COVID-19–Specific Messaging and a Free Patch Offer
2023, American Journal of Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :Quasi-randomized studies have had similar findings. One that targeted disadvantaged Australians who smoke found that offering free patches attracted 2.7 times as many people as offering counseling alone.10 The other, by the current research team targeting California Medicaid members who smoke, found that offering free patches increased quitline enrollment fourfold.7
Tobacco quitlines: Opportunities for innovation to increase reach and effectiveness
2022, Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :Nearly a decade ago, an evaluation of the impact of televised media campaigns on calls to the English National Health Service Stop Smoking helpline found that positive and negative messaging were both effective at increasing Quitline calls, however, positive messaging had a clear dose-response relation and negative messaging only impacted call rates at higher levels of exposure (Richardson et al., 2014). Of note, evidence suggests that promoting NRT give-aways can be more effective than media campaigns for driving calls to Qutilines (An et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2005). In 2007, Anderson and Zhu (Anderson and Zhu, 2007) foresaw the expansion of traditional telephonic Quitline services with the provision of free NRT.
The experimental tobacco marketplace: Effects of low-ventilated cigarette exposure
2022, Addictive BehaviorsDecídetexto: Mobile cessation support for Latino smokers. Study protocol for a randomized clinical trial
2020, Contemporary Clinical TrialsEffects of Offering Nicotine Patches, Incentives, or Both on Quitline Demand
2018, American Journal of Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :Using a 2 × 2 design in a promotional mailing to more than 4.2 million Medicaid households allowed a direct comparison of the effects of various incentive offers on quitline demand. The study found that offering free patches led to a significant increase in demand, consistent with previous research.6–14 Most such studies used pre–post designs and found that offering patches increased calls by anywhere from 1.4 to 25 times.8,11
Economic Impact of Financial Incentives and Mailing Nicotine Patches to Help Medicaid Smokers Quit Smoking: A Cost–Benefit Analysis
2018, American Journal of Preventive Medicine