Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 352, Issue 9125, 1 August 1998, Page 374
The Lancet

Research Letters
Implications of chills

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60475-8Get rights and content

References (5)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • High positivity of blood cultures obtained within two hours after shaking chills

    2018, International Journal of Infectious Diseases
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although not significant, the median time to blood culture draw after the start of recent shaking chills tended to be shorter for Gram-negative infections than for Gram-positive infections (2 h vs. 4 h, p = 0.063). Former research has suggested that chills are more common in Gram-negative infections than in Gram-positive or viral infections (Van Dissel et al., 1998; Van Dissel et al., 2005). Endotoxin is a principal cell component that interacts with the host in Gram-negative bacterial sepsis (Suffredini et al., 1989).

  • A risk stratification model of acute pyelonephritis to indicate hospital admission from the ED

    2013, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    The exclusion criteria in the previous study were severe sepsis or septic shock, an immunocompromised state (on chemotherapy or immunosuppressive medication), history of chronic renal failure, acute renal failure (serum creatinine level > 2 mg/dL), neurogenic bladder, patients with urinary catheters, and previous kidney transplantation except obstructive APN. Although a chilling sensation is somewhat subjective, in febrile patients, it was associated with the incidence of bacteremia in many studies, and the degree of the chills has been reported to be important to predict the risk of bacteremia and a higher risk of death with a positive blood culture [17-21]. A higher percentage of segmented neutrophils were also a prognostic factor for predicting bacteremia in patients with severe infections [7,22].

  • Serial and panel analyses of biomarkers do not improve the prediction of bacteremia compared to one procalcitonin measurement

    2012, Journal of Infection
    Citation Excerpt :

    Either one major criterion or two minor criteria may serve as an indication to obtain blood cultures. Furthermore, in a prospective study of 464 consecutive patients in two hospitals, the sensitivity of chills in the prediction of bacteremia was 58% and 73%, and specificity 65% and 62%.36 We demonstrate that the predictive value of clinical signs of sepsis or conventional laboratory parameters is minimal and combining PCT with these items does not improve the predictive value of PCT.

  • Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia Among Patients with Health Care-associated Fever

    2009, American Journal of Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    A patient's complaint of chills was associated with both all-cause and S. aureus bacteremia. This finding is consistent with previous studies.4,5,30,31 Despite having poor sensitivity and specificity, the reported negative predictive value of chills was up to 85%30 or higher.31

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text