Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 36, Issue 5, May 2003, Pages 629-635
Preventive Medicine

Regular article
Drivers’ use of handheld cell phones before and after New York State’s cell phone law

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00021-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

In response to public concern about driver distraction from cellular telephones, New York became the first state to ban handheld cell phone use while driving. The law, accompanied by considerable publicity, included a warning phase (November 2001), after which violators could be fined. Until March 2002, fines could be waived if motorists provided proof of purchase of hands-free accessories.

Methods

Daytime cell phone use among passenger vehicle drivers was observed at controlled intersections 1 month before the law’s implementation, after fines could be issued (December 2001), and after waivers were not allowed (March 2002). Use was observed for 37,462 vehicles in four New York communities and 21,315 vehicles in two central Connecticut communities. Driver gender, estimated age, and vehicle type were recorded for cell phone users and a sample of passing motorists.

Results

The use rate in New York declined significantly from 2.3% before the law to 1.1% after the law (P < 0.05). Use rates in Connecticut, an adjacent state without a law, did not change. In both states, use was higher among drivers of sport utility vehicles (P < 0.05) and minimal among drivers ages 60 or older. In New York, observed use declined among drivers younger than 60, male and female drivers, and all vehicle types.

Conclusions

A well-publicized law restricting drivers’ use of handheld cell phones had a strong effect on behavior. Whether compliance will remain high is unknown.

Introduction

As the frequency of talking on a cellular telephone (hereafter referred to as “cell phone”) has increased, there has been growing public concern about the crash risks that may be associated with driving while talking on a cell phone. An estimated 137 million persons currently subscribe to cell phone service in the United States [1]. Several recent U.S. studies have attempted to estimate the prevalence of cell phone use while driving. The 2000 Motor Vehicle Occupant Safety Survey, a telephone survey conducted periodically by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), reported that 54% of drivers usually had some type of cell phone in their vehicle, of whom 73% said that they use their phone while driving [2].

NHTSA has estimated that 3% of U.S. drivers of passenger vehicles at any given time during daylight hours are talking on a handheld cell phone [2]. This estimate was based on observations of motorists stopped at intersections, conducted as part of the Controlled Intersection Study of the 2000 National Occupant Protection Use Survey. A 2001 observational study in Washington State [3], using a probability-based statewide sample of all types of roadway segments, estimated that at any given time during daylight hours, 3.5% of drivers were using a handheld cell phone. North Carolina researchers observed about a 3% handheld use rate, which varied among the different regions of the state [4]. A 2000 observational study [5] conducted on Dallas County, Texas, highways during the weekday afternoon rush hour found a handheld cell phone use rate of 5%.

The risks related to cell phone use while driving are not yet fully understood, including the number of crashes in which cell phones are a contributing factor; whether risk is primarily related to the physical problem of maneuvering a vehicle while dialing or holding the equipment, or to the conversation itself; and whether phones are a greater or lesser problem than other potential distractions in the driving environment. An abundance of studies based on driving simulators, test tracks, or instrumented vehicles indicate that extraneous activities, including the use of cell phones, carried out while driving can impair driving performance [6], although these research methods do not necessarily reflect real-world driving or crash experience. Three epidemiologic studies in Canada reported increased crash involvements in relation to cell phone use, although they differed in the magnitude of the reported increase in risk [7], [8], [9]. A Japanese study suggests that risk is especially high when answering the telephone or dialing while driving [10].

Opinions vary about the relative hazards associated with using hands-free technology, like speakerphones or earpiece attachments, compared with handheld devices. Some simulator and test track studies have reported that hands-free devices also can impair performance significantly [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. According to Strayer and Johnston [15], hands-free and handheld phones resulted in equal impairment in simulators, and both created higher levels of driver distraction than listening to the radio or audio books. Other researchers reported somewhat greater impairment from the use of handheld phones compared with hands-free phones, based on simulator data [16], [17]. None of the epidemiologic studies examining this question had sufficient numbers of hands-free cell phone users to draw definitive conclusions [7], [8].

At least 25 countries restrict or prohibit the use of cell phones while driving, and almost all U.S. states have considered legislation that would limit drivers’ use of cell phones [18]. On June 26, 2001, New York became the first state to enact a statewide law that bans talking on a handheld cell phone while driving. The enactment of the New York ban was fueled partly by the passage of local bans in the downstate counties of Nassau, Suffolk, and Westchester, and partly by widespread public support for a state law. A poll conducted in March 2001 indicated that 87% of New York voters favored a ban on drivers’ use of handheld cell phones [19].

New York’s law was implemented on November 1, 2001. The law makes it a traffic violation, punishable by a fine of $100, for a driver to hold a cell phone to or near the ear while the vehicle is in motion, unless the driver is calling for help or reporting a dangerous situation [20]. The law does not apply to driving while talking on a telephone with a hands-free device, nor does it prohibit manual dialing or using a handheld phone when the vehicle is stopped, such as at a stop light. Under a phased-in approach, violators received only verbal warnings from law enforcement officers during November 2001, the first month after the law took effect. From December 1 through February 28, 2002, citations could be issued, but judges could waive fines for the first offense if a driver provided proof of purchase of a headset or speakerphone. As of March 1, 2002, fines were no longer waived. In this article, the period from December 1 to February 28 is referred to as the “fine with waiver” phase. The period March 1 and later is referred to as the “fine without waiver” phase.

In the public debate concerning how to address the relatively new hazard posed by using cell phones while driving, one important question is whether drivers will comply with legislative restrictions on the use of handheld phones. The objective of this study was to measure any change in the use of handheld cell phones by New York State drivers before and after the implementation of the cell phone law. In addition, the rates of cell phone use were examined for driver gender, age, and vehicle type.

Section snippets

Methods

Daytime observations of drivers’ use of handheld cell phones in New York State before and after implementation of the law were compared with observations conducted in Connecticut, a state contiguous to New York without restrictions on the use of handheld phones while driving.

Results

Across the three observation waves, information on cell phone use during the 35-min observation periods was collected for a total of 37,462 vehicles in four New York metropolitan areas; this included 11,768 at baseline (prelaw), 12,732 in December 2001, and 12,962 in March 2002. In the two Connecticut metropolitan areas, 21,315 vehicles were observed: 7110 at baseline, 6817 in December, and 7388 in March. Information on the characteristics of the traffic flow during the 10-min observation

Discussion

It is apparent from the results of this study that New York’s ban on handheld cell phones while driving had the intended result during the first few months after it became effective. Based on combined observations from four metropolitan areas in New York, drivers’ use of handheld cell phones declined significantly after implementation of the fine-with-waiver phase of the law, and use remained at this lower level after the fine-without-waiver provision took effect. The use rate in the two

Acknowledgements

Funding for this study was provided by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The authors gratefully acknowledge research assistance from Laurie A. Nelson and statistical advice from Charles M. Farmer of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. We also thank Zlatko Savic and Tara Casanova of Preusser Research Group for diligent assistance with field work.

References (21)

  • A.J. McKnight et al.

    The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention

    Accid Anal Prev

    (1993)
  • Utter D. Passenger vehicle driver cell phone use results from the fall 2000 National Occupant Protection Use Survey....
  • Salzberg P. Cell phone use by motor vehicle drivers in Washington State. Olympia, WA: Washington Traffic Safety...
  • Reinfurt DW, Huang HF, Feaganes JR, Hunter WW. Cell phone use while driving in North Carolina. Chapel Hill, NC:...
  • Crawford JA. Assessment of handheld cellular telephone use on Dallas County, Texas Freeways. Presented at the...
  • Ranney TA, Garrott WR, Goodman MJ. NHTSA driver distraction research: past, present, and future. Proceedings of the...
  • D.A. Redelmeier et al.

    Association between cell phone calls and motor vehicle collisions

    JAMA

    (1997)
  • Laberge-Nadeau C, Maag U, Bellavance F, Desjardins D, Messier S, Saïdi A. Wireless telephones and the risk of road...
  • Wilson J, Cooper P, Fang M, Wiggins S. Collision and violation involvement of drivers who use cellular telephones....
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (55)

  • The impact of Illinois’ comprehensive handheld phone ban on talking on handheld and handsfree cellphones while driving

    2023, Journal of Safety Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Among study participants, Illinois’ handheld phone ban was associated with a reduction in talking on handheld phones while driving, and that this reduction was more extreme than the one observed in control states. This finding was consistent with several other studies supporting the efficacy of handheld phone bans to reduce handheld phone use while driving (Benedetti et al., 2022; Braitman & McCartt, 2010; Carpenter & Nguyen, 2015; Li et al., 2020; McCartt & Geary, 2004; McCartt et al., 2003, 2010; Rudisill & Zhu, 2017; Rudisill et al., 2018, 2019; Zhu et al., 2016). When considered in the context of evidence that (i) handheld phone use is associated with multiple decrements in driving performance (Caird et al., 2008; Fitch et al., 2013; Klauer et al., 2014); and (ii) comprehensive handheld phone bans like the one in Illinois are associated reductions in MVC fatalities (Zhu et al., 2021); these findings underscore the importance of handheld phone bans in improving traffic safety.

  • Hands-free law in Georgia: Predictors of post-law cellphone use among college drivers

    2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • Changes in the sources of distracted driving among Northern Virginia drivers in 2014 and 2018: A comparison of results from two roadside observation surveys

    2019, Journal of Safety Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Virginia's law is narrow and only prohibits a few of the many ways a hand-held phone can be used while driving, which may make it difficult to enforce. Laws that prohibit all drivers from using a hand-held cell phone are effective for reducing phone use (McCartt, Braver, & Geary, 2003; McCartt, Hellinga, & Geary, 2006). Virginia's law may be more effective in reducing driver phone use if it prohibited all hand-held cellphone use and was strongly enforced using high visibility enforcement (e.g., Chaudhary, Casanova-Powell, Cosgrove, Reagan, & Willaims, 2012).

  • Cellphone Legislation and Self-Reported Behaviors Among Subgroups of Adolescent U.S. Drivers

    2018, Journal of Adolescent Health
    Citation Excerpt :

    A prior study conducted among adults revealed that the frequency of self-reported handheld phone conversations was lower among drivers in states with universal handheld calling bans compared with that in states without bans [26]. Observational studies of drivers have also shown that universal handheld calling bans were associated with ~50% lower occurrences of handheld conversations [19,22–25], which corroborates with the findings of the present study, which also found the occurrence of self-reported conversations to be 55% lower overall when universal handheld calling bans were present. Although most subgroups shared similar associations, the presence of a universal handheld calling ban was not associated with lower occurrences of handheld conversations among rural drivers.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text