The impact of external feedback on computer-assisted learning for surgical technical skill training

Presented at the 19th Annual Meeting of the Association for Surgical Education, Boston, Massachusetts, April 7–10, 1999.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00341-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Background: Computer-assisted learning (CAL) offers a number of potential advantages for surgical technical skills teaching. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of individualized external feedback on surgical skill acquisition when a CAL package is used for instruction.

Methods: Freshman and sophomore students participated in a 1-hour CAL session designed to teach them how to tie a two-handed square knot. One group received individualized external feedback during the session and the other group did not. Subjects were videotaped performing the skill before and after the session. The tapes were independently analyzed, in blinded fashion, by three surgeons. Three measures were obtained: the total time for the task, whether or not the knot was square, and the general quality of the performance using a rating scale.

Results: Data from 105 subjects were available for final analysis. For both groups there were significant increases in the proportion of knots that were square when the posttest performance was compared with the pretest performance but there was no difference between groups on this measure. Comparison of the performance scores demonstrated that both groups had a significant improvement after the session but the performance scores were significantly better in the group that had received feedback.

Conclusions: Novices in both groups using CAL showed improvement in two of the outcomes measured, suggesting that subjects in both groups attained some degree of competence with this skill. The higher posttest performance score for the group receiving feedback demonstrates that external feedback results in a higher level of mastery when CAL is used to teach surgical technical skills.

Section snippets

Methods

Approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at the Medical College of Georgia. Freshman and sophomore medical students were enrolled in the study, and each was randomly assigned to either the CAL alone group or the CAL and feedback group. The subjects were not paid to participate in the study but were allowed to keep the knot-tying board, manual, and rope. Both groups used the CAL program that has been described previously.1 The subjects were placed in groups of seven or eight and

Results

One hundred and eight subjects were enrolled in the study. Data from 3 of the subjects were excluded because it was not possible to evaluate one of the performances, and so data from 105 subjects were available for final analysis. Fifty-four subjects were in the CAL with feedback group and 51 subjects were in the CAL alone group. Average age, gender distribution, and handedness were similar for both groups.

A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) evaluating the effect of time (pretest versus

Comments

The results of this study not only provide additional evidence for the importance of external feedback from a content expert in the instruction of basic surgical skills but they also provide some evidence for the effectiveness of CAL alone for this purpose.

The acquisition of motor skills is subject to continuing research and several theories have evolved. These theories have become divergent enough to be considered a different “schools.”2, 3 One unifying characteristic of these theories is the

References (7)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (96)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text