Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography and coronary angiography for assessing the acute protective effects of collateral recruitment during occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery at the time of elective angioplasty

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00134-3Get rights and content

Abstract

To assess the immediate change in collateral flow distribution within the occluded myocardium and the acute protective effects on myocardial ischemia after coronary occlusion, myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) was performed in 15 patients with normal left ventricular function undergoing elective coronary angioplasty of the left anterior descending artery, and the results were compared with those obtained from coronary angiography (CA). The sonicated or nonsonicated contrast material was injected into the right coronary artery before and during coronary occlusion and collaterals were graded on a 4-point scale (none = 0 to good = 3). Development of subjective anginal symptoms, ST-segment shift and wall motion abnormality during coronary occlusion were graded on a 4-point scale (none = 0 to severe = 3). Both MCE and CA detected a significant development in collateral flow during coronary occlusion. There was no significant correlation between MCE and CA collateral grades before or during coronary occlusion. The collateral flow assessed with MCE was inversely but significantly correlated with development of subjective anginal symptoms (rs = −0.70, p < 0.01), ST-segment shift (rs = −0.78, p < 0.005) or wall motion abnormality (rs = −0.91, p < 0.001) during coronary occlusion. In contrast, the angiographic collateral flow was not correlated with development of anginal symptoms (rs = −0.46, p = 0.10), ST-segment shift (rs = −0.41, p = 0.14), or wall motion abnormality (rs = −0.26, p = 0.35). The present study suggested that the acute protective effects of coronary collaterals during coronary occlusion were closely associated with myocardial perfusion rather than the angiographic epicardial collateral vessel filling, and thus MCE was useful in assessing the acute protective effects of coronary collaterals during coronary occlusion.

References (30)

  • B De Bruyne et al.

    Potential protective effect of high coronary wedge pressure on left ventricular function after coronary occlusion

    Circulation

    (1988)
  • M Cohen et al.

    Limitation of myocardial ischemia by collateral circulation during sudden controlled coronary artery occlusion in human subjects: a prospective study

    Circulation

    (1986)
  • GB Habib et al.

    Influence of coronary collateral vessels on myocardial infarct size in humans: results of phase I Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (ITMI) trial

    Circulation

    (1991)
  • PJ Sabia et al.

    Functional significance of collateral blood flow in patients with recent acute myocardial infarction: a study using myocardial contrast echocardiography

    Circulation

    (1992)
  • A Takeshita et al.

    Immediate appearance of coronary collaterals during ergonovine-induced arterial spasm

    Chest

    (1982)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Quantitative Assessment of Microcollateral Recruitment During Coronary Occlusion Using Real-time Intravenous Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography

      2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, anatomic and morphometric methods, such as postmortem casts, dyes, and colored or radiolabeled microspheres, have been used to identify coronary collateral microvascular anatomy; however, these assessments cannot be performed repetitively in short periods of time. We have already reported that the acute protective effects of coronary collaterals during acute coronary occlusion are significantly correlated with myocardial perfusion assessed using MCE, rather than the angiographic epicardial collateral vessel filling.4 Many studies have reported the advantages and superiority of MCE to coronary angiography.8,9

    • Intraoperative ischemia and long-term events after minimally invasive coronary surgery

      2004, Annals of Thoracic Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another limitation is that troponin enzymes were not systematically available at the time of the study. Myocardial contrast echocardiography is more accurate than coronary angiography in the detection of collateral circulation [19] and could have added insights into the mechanism of protection against ischemia. Also, the metabolic effects of coronary occlusion were not assessed in the present study.

    • Fate of collateral circulation after successful coronary angioplasty of total occlusion assessed by coronary angiography and myocardial contrast echocardiography

      2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, previous studies only assessed epicardial collateral vessel filling rather than myocardial perfusion through the collateral circulation in the occluded bed. MCE is a suitable imaging technique for the assessment of myocardial perfusion through collateral flow by the selective intracoronary injection of a sonicated contrast medium into a donor coronary artery.26-35 Previous studies have demonstrated the functional significance of collateral flow detection by MCE in both the experimental and clinical setting.

    • Acute changes in systolic and diastolic events during clinical coronary angioplasty: A comparison of regional velocity, strain rate, and strain measurement

      2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
      Citation Excerpt :

      The impact of collateral circulation on myocardial function and global left ventricular performance has already been well recognized.29,30 It has been also shown that collaterals protect “at-risk” areas during coronary angioplasty of the related artery.35 Thus, they can alter the response of a myocardial segment to acute ischemia.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text