Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 41, Issue 9, November 1995, Pages 1241-1254
Social Science & Medicine

Health promotion in primary care: Physician-patient communication and decision making about prescription medications

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00061-BGet rights and content

Abstract

To examine health promotion in a primary-care context, we studied perceived and actual communication in 271 consultations between general practitioners and patients in Oxford (England). Although health promotion is a term usually reserved for public-health or wellness programs, a health promotion perspective enriches the examination of communication in physician-patient interactions by emphasizing issues of empowerment, competence and control. Accordingly, we are interested in how communication during medical encounters can improve patients' abilities to exercise appropriate control over their health. A major factor in enabling patients to increase control over their health involves developing their competencies for making decisions and enacting behaviors that can lead to desired, and attainable, health outcomes. This report focuses on communication and decision making about prescription medications, since whether and how to use medications are among the most common and important decisions in which patients can participate. Five instruments were employed to collect data about physicians, patients and their consultations: a Video Analysis, which allowed assessment of actual communication behavior; a Patient Questionnaire designed to gauge perceptions of the encounter and collect demographic information; a Medical-Record Review, which provided information on utilization, diagnosis and treatment; a Telephone Interview, conducted 14 days after the consultation to obtain follow-up information (e.g. experience with the prescribed medication); and a Doctor Questionnaire that focused on attitudes toward consultations and patients. With respect to communication about prescription medications, physicians most frequently mentioned product name (78.2% of consultations) and instructions for use (86.7% of consultations). Patients were extremely passive, rarely offering their opinion or initiating discussion about any aspect of the treatment. We suggest that improving patients' decision-making competencies may require more discussion of benefits and risks, as well as discussion of patients' opinions about the prescribed medications and their abilities to follow through with the treatment plans. The research design proved useful in highlighting discrepancies between perceived and actual communication. Physicians tended to overestimate the extent to which they discussed patients' ability to follow the treatment plan, elicited patients' opinion about the prescribed medication and discussed risks of the medication. And, 24.3% of the patients left the consultation with an ‘illusion of competence’, a belief that important topics had been discussed when, in fact, they had not been mentioned at all. The pattern of results illustrates the complexity of health promotion in primary care, and underscores the importance of attending to both perceived and actual communication in medical encounters.

References (41)

  • C. Peterson et al.

    Personal control and health promotion

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1989)
  • E.C. Annandale

    Dimensions of patient control in a free-standing birth center

    Soc. sci. Med.

    (1987)
  • G.V. Stimson

    Obeying doctors orders: a view from the other side

    Soc. sci. Med.

    (1974)
  • World Health Organization

    The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion

    (1986)
  • G. Makoul

    Communication in the health-care context: a review essay

    Commun. Educ.

    (1991)
  • D. Schorr et al.

    The role of perceived control in practitioner-patient relationships

  • M. Seeman et al.

    Health behavior and personal autonomy: a longitudinal study of the sense of control in illness

    J. Hlth Soc. Behav.

    (1983)
  • D.A. Brenders

    Perceived control and the interpersonal dimension of health care

    Hlth Commun.

    (1989)
  • L.A. Morris

    Communicating adverse drug effects to patients

    J. clin. Res. Dev.

    (1989)
  • P. Arntson

    Improving citizens' health competencies

    Hlth Commun.

    (1989)
  • G. Makoul

    Perpetuating passivity: A study of physician-patient communication and decision making

    (1992)
  • D. Tuckett et al.
  • B. Peguet et al.

    Prescription Drugs: A Survey of Consumer Use, Attitudes and Behavior

    (1984)
  • G. Makoul

    Health Locus-of-Control and Concern as Predictors of Health-Information Attention and Acquisition among the Elderly

    (1990)
  • American Board of Family Practice

    The Changing Health Care Consumer and Patient/Doctor Partnership

    (1987)
  • D. Pendleton et al.

    The Consultation: An Approach to Learning and Teaching

    (1984)
  • H. Waitzkin

    Information giving in medical care

    J. Hlth Soc. Behav.

    (1985)
  • H. Waitzkin

    Doctor-patient communication: clinical implications of social scientific research

    J. Am. Med. Assoc.

    (1984)
  • J.P. Folger et al.

    Coding social interaction

  • J.P. Kassirer

    Adding insult to injury: usurping patients' prerogatives

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1983)
  • Cited by (303)

    • Bringing personal perspective elicitation to the heart of shared decision-making: A scoping review

      2022, Patient Education and Counseling
      Citation Excerpt :

      Two studies used an adapted version of the IDM with a 3-point scale: in 5% and 11% of the encounters preference elicitation was fully present and in 46% and 48% of the encounters it was partly present [69,72]. Four studies used a self-developed questionnaire that contained PPE-related items (see Table C2 - supplementary file) [75,76,78,79]. One study scored whether the doctor discussed non-medical psychosocial issues with the patient, which happened in 39% of the encounters in the intervention group and 35% in the control group [74].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text