Social research in health and the American sociopolitical context: The changing fortunes of medical sociology

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90200-NGet rights and content

Abstract

The fortunes of medical sociology, like other public policy-relevant disciplines, are shaped by political dynamics and prevailing values and attitudes. In the 1990s the field, which views disease and disability as consequences to a substantial degree of material conditions, social stratification, and inequalities among varying strata, lost ground to economics as societal attention focused on cost containment issues. Sociological concern with social structures clashed with dominant conservative and individualistic perspectives and the increased focus on personal responsibility and market strategies. There was decreasing tolerance in policy circles for the view that health, and the problems affecting disenfranchised groups such as the poor, the homeless, the uninsured and people with disabilities, were more due to our politics and social arrangements that the personal characteristics of those affected. Thus, little attention has been given in public health discourse to how life imperatives and social opportunities and constraints shape behavior. The paper documents the important role of the social sciences in health services research with special attention to examining the social context of the RAND Health Insurance Experiment. Although many of the questions medical sociology address sit on the periphery of policy-makers' concerns, a strong case is made for the revitalization of a critical scholarly role in medical sociology. I conclude, given the short and longterm problems we face in medicine and health, that we would have to invent a vigorous critical medical sociological enterprise if we did not already have one.

References (39)

  • S.W. Bloom

    Institutional trends in medical sociology

    J. Hlth Soc. Behav.

    (1986)
  • D. Mechanic

    The role of sociology in health affairs

    Hlth Aff.

    (1990)
  • A. Hollingshead et al.

    Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community Study

    (1958)
  • T. Parsons

    The Social System

    (1951)
  • M. Field

    Doctor and Patient in Soviet Russia

    (1957)
  • I. Pilowsky

    A general classification of abnormal illness behavior

    Br. J. Med. Psychol.

    (1978)
  • D. Mechanic

    Medical Sociology

  • G.R. Smith

    Somatization Disorder in the Medical Setting

    (1990)
  • A. Kleinman

    Social Origins of Distress and Disease: Depression, Neurasthenia and Pain in Modern China

    (1986)
  • A. Kleinman

    The Illness Narratives: Suffering, Healing and the Human Condition

    (1988)
  • H. Waitzkin et al.

    Changing the structure of medical discourse: Implications of cross-national comparisons

    J. Hlth Soc. Behav.

    (1989)
  • A.H. Stanton et al.

    The Mental Hospital: A Study of Institutional Participation in Psychiatric Illness and Treatment

    (1954)
  • E. Goffman

    Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and other Inmates

    (1961)
  • D. Fox

    Health policy and the politics of research in the United States

    J. Polit. Pol. Law

    (1990)
  • D. Mechanic

    The medical marketplace and its delivery failures

  • P. Starr

    The Social Transformation of American Medicine

    (1982)
  • H.M. Somers et al.

    Doctors, Patients, and Health Insurance

    (1961)
  • D. Mechanic

    Promoting health

    Society

    (1990)
  • Cited by (43)

    • The cancer technology appraisal programme of the UK's National Institute for clinical excellence

      2003, Lancet Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The British Medical Journal highlighted the difficult balance to be struck when national health policy is expected to be determined by research.”5 An American sociologist, David Mechanic, argues that “research is a form of currency as varying interests negotiate a political solution, but research is never definitive to resolve major issues on which strong political interests differ.”6 The stakes are now very high as the acceptance of a new intervention can have an enormous financial impact in addition to effects on treatment provision.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text