Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 35, Issue 8, October 1992, Pages 1027-1035
Social Science & Medicine

Deriving a survey measure of social support: The reliability and validity of the close persons questionnaire

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90242-IGet rights and content

Abstract

The development of a new questionnaire to measure social support, the Close Persons Questionnaire is described from the Whitehall II Study, a longitudinal study of the impact of psychosocial factors on health. The Close Persons Questionnaire includes items on three types of support from up to four nominated close persons and social networks. Its repeatability over a four week period and its validity against the Self Evaluation and Social Support Interview is reported in a sample of British Civil Servants. The difficulties of satisfactorily validating measures of social support are discussed.

References (37)

  • K. Orth-Gomer et al.

    The measurement of social support in population surveys

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1987)
  • D.P. Funch et al.

    Assessment of a short scale to measure social support

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1986)
  • A. Unden et al.

    Development of a social support instrument for use in population surveys

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1989)
  • G.W. Brown et al.

    Social support, self-esteem and depression

    Psychol. Med.

    (1986)
  • L.F. Berkman et al.

    Social networks, host resistance and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda county residents

    Am. J. Epidemiol.

    (1979)
  • N. Lin et al.

    Social support scales: a methodological note

    Schizophr. Bull.

    (1989)
  • J.S. House et al.

    Measures and concepts of social support

  • I. McDowell et al.

    Measuring Health: a Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires

    (1987)
  • S. Henderson et al.

    Neurosis and the Social Environment

    (1981)
  • A. Dean et al.

    The stress-buffering role of social support: problems and prospects for systematic investigation

    J. Nervous mental Dis.

    (1977)
  • B.H. Kaplan et al.

    Social support and health

    Med. Care

    (1977)
  • G. Parry et al.

    Social support and life events in working class women

    Archs Gen. Psychiat.

    (1986)
  • R.L. Kahn et al.

    Convoys over the life course: attachment, roles and social support

  • A.H. McFarlane et al.

    Methodological issues in developing a scale to measure social support

    Schizophr. Bull.

    (1981)
  • S. Henderson et al.

    Measuring social relationships. The interview schedule for social interaction

    Psychol. Med.

    (1980)
  • M. Barrera

    Social support in the adjustment of pregnant adolescents: assessment issues

  • S. Cohen et al.

    Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress

    J. appl. Soc. Psychol.

    (1983)
  • J.S. House

    Work Stress and Social Support

    (1981)
  • Cited by (177)

    • Investigating the relationship between spatial and social cognitive maps in humans

      2022, Journal of Environmental Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, we also chose to evaluate the state of the social networks an individual has. To do this, we included the Close Persons Inventory (Stansfeld & Marmot, 1992), which will inform if an individual has practical and emotional support from their social networks, and if there are any negative aspects to these relationships. Due to affiliation being associated with social cognitive maps (Tavares et al., 2015), we hypothesize that participants who have greater and higher quality social networks will have better spatial ability than those who have few and poor quality social networks, since they have the resources needed to hierarchically map a proper social network.

    • Network recall among older adults with cognitive impairments

      2021, Social Networks
      Citation Excerpt :

      A variety of approaches have been employed to address the issue of network recall. Whereas early research relied on observational data to assess reports of social interactions (Bernard and Killworth, 1977; Freeman et al., 1987; Romney and Weller, 1984), subsequent studies compared network reports from multiple parties to determine the level of agreement between different perspectives (adams and Moody, 2007; Antonucci and Israel, 1986; Crotty and Kulys, 1985; Stansfeld and Marmot, 1992; Stein et al., 1995; White and Watkins, 2000). Yet nearly all of these latter studies focused solely the degree of overlap between informant accounts only to ignore the sources of discrepancy.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text