The role of public values in setting health care priorities

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(91)90303-TGet rights and content

Abstract

Public values must play a substantial role in any attempt to deal with the health care resource allocation problem. This article examines how preferences for the health outcomes of care (e.g. improved or worsened physical suffering) can provide a coherent basis upon which set explicit health care priorities.

Preferences for health outcomes could be mapped onto information concerning the outcomes expected from the specific health services when used for particular clinical conditions. These ‘preference-weighted’ outcomes would determine the relative priority given to health services for each specific condition. Generic outcome measures would be used in order to permit comparison of benefits and harms across different services.

It is argued herein that allocation rules cannot be based on individual patients' preferences. Instead, average population preferences should be used to evaluate the relative importance of services—as occurs in other insurance contexts—despite theoretical concerns about the aggregation of preferences.

Patients' preferences might also be estimated by reference to relevant demographic factors, but only if population subgroups are identified with relatively homogeneous preference patterns and if the use of such subgroups is deemed socially acceptable. Concerns about stereotyping and discrimination might limit the tractability of this approach.

References (48)

  • H. Llewellyn-Thomas et al.

    Describing health states: methodological issues in obtaining values for health states

    Med. Care

    (1984)
  • G.W. Torrance et al.

    A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs

    Hlth Serv. Res.

    (1972)
  • Hadorn D. C. Health care needs and standards of proof. Submitted for...
  • N. Daniels

    Just Health Care

    (1985)
  • J. Moskop

    Rawlsian justice and a human right health care

    J. Med. Phil.

    (1983)
  • Hadorn D. C. Setting health care priorities in Oregon: cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescue. J. Am. Med. Assoc....
  • R. Rosser et al.

    A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus?

    Int. J. Epidem.

    (1978)
  • R.M. Kaplan et al.

    The general health policy model: an integrated approach

  • J.R. Beck et al.

    A convenient approximation of life expectancy (The “DEALE”): validation of the method

    Am. J. Med.

    (1982)
  • D.M. Eddy

    The Confidence Profile Method: A Bayesian approach for assessing health care technologies

    Oper. Res.

    (1989)
  • P.M. Ellwood

    Outcomes management: a technology of patient experience

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1988)
  • M. Bergner et al.

    The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of the health status measure

    Med. Care

    (1981)
  • S.M. Hunt et al.

    Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists

    J.R. Coll. Gen. Pract.

    (1985)
  • A.L. Stewart et al.

    Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions

    JAMA

    (1989)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text