How physicians choose drugs

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(88)90203-1Get rights and content

Abstract

A drug choice model which includes the physician's attitudes, norms and personal experiences with drugs, was tested. One hundred and sixty-nine physicians were asked the estimate the model's components for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and of renal colic. Given three drugs for both indications, the physicians gave their expectancies about the treatment outcomes, professional acceptability, patient demand and their personal experiences with the drugs. They also stated the value they assign to each of these components when choosing a drug for IBS and for renal colic. The influence of patient demand on the choice of a specific drug appeared to be negligible. The combined effect of the other three elements of the model predicted the stated drug of first choice correctly in 74% (for IBS) and 78% (for renal colic) of the cases, but further analysis showed that only the drug choices for renal colic were as reasoned as the model assumed. Expectancies and values about treatment outcomes determined the drug choice only in part. For choosing a drug for renal colic, the professional environment was more important. Moreover it was found that drug preferences were more related to expectancies about efficacy than to expectancies about side effects for both disorders. The findings can be useful when trying to change prescribing behaviour. Only a limited effect can be expected from the provision of technical drug information. Especially information about costs is unlikely to change prescribing easily, unless values and norms are changed as well. The importance of the professional environment implies that educational programmes in groups might be more effective than individual approaches.

References (29)

  • A.M. Epstein et al.

    Physician beliefs, attitudes and prescribing behavior for anti-inflammatory drugs

    Am. J. Med.

    (1984)
  • R.J. Plumridge

    Intervention strategies aimed at modifying prescribing behaviour

    Aust. J. Hosp. Pharm.

    (1984)
  • J. Horder et al.

    Ways of influencing the behavior of General Practitioners

    J. R. Coll. Gen. Pract.

    (1986)
  • S.A. Schroeder

    Strategies for reducing medical costs by changing physicians' behavior: efficacy and impact on quality of care

    Int. J. Technol. Assessmt

    (1987)
  • G.M. Shenfield et al.

    Effect of restrictions on prescribing patterns for dextropropoxephene

    Br. med. J.

    (1980)
  • R.B. Haynes et al.

    A critical appraisal of the efficacy of CME

    J. Am. med. Ass.

    (1984)
  • K.J. Fendler et al.

    The impact of drug bulletins on physician prescribing habits

    Drug Intelligence Clin. Pharm.

    (1984)
  • D.S. Watson et al.

    General practitioner prescribing habits: the western Australian experience

    Med. J. Aust.

    (1975)
  • C.G. Berbatis et al.

    Impact of a drug bulletin on prescribing oral analgetics in a teaching hospital

    Am. J. Hosp. Pharm.

    (1982)
  • J. Avorn et al.

    Improving drug therapy decisions through educational outreach

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (1983)
  • W. Schaffner et al.

    Improving antibiotic prescribing in office practice

    J. Am. med. Ass.

    (1983)
  • C.E. Evans

    Does a mailed continuing education program improve physician performance?

    J. Am. med. Ass.

    (1986)
  • K.L. Melmon et al.

    The undereducated physician's therapeutic decisions

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (1983)
  • W.J. McGuire

    Attitudes and attitude change

  • Cited by (0)

    View full text