ArticlePain Disability Index: Construct and discriminant validity
References (14)
- et al.
Direct observation of pain behavior in low back pain patients during physical examination
Pain
(1984) - et al.
The West Haven-Yale multidimensional pain inventory (WHYMPI)
Pain
(1985) - et al.
The pain disability index: psychometric properties
Pain
(1990) - et al.
A prospective short-term study of chronic low back pain patients utilizing novel objective functional measurement
Pain
(1986) General considerations of chronic pain
Cited by (105)
Deconstructing Pain Disability through Concept Analysis
2019, Pain Management NursingCitation Excerpt :In contrast to operationalizing the terms pain and disability independently, the term pain disability is narrowly concentrated in the clinical literature, with a focus on individuals experiencing pain. Circa 1990, the use of the concept centered on vocational status and the ability for individuals with chronic pain to return to work (Aronoff, 1991; Goldman & O'Neill, 1990; Jerome & Gross, 1991; Tait, Chibnall, & Krause, 1990). In 1991, Aronoff candidly specified that disability was a legal term, whereas impairment was a medical term and, further, that they were not to be substituted for one another.
Difficulties in emotion regulation and chronic pain-related disability and opioid misuse
2018, Addictive BehaviorsCitation Excerpt :Total scores range from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicative of greater levels of disability. The PDI has demonstrated good construct validity and good internal reliability (Jerome & Gross, 1991; Tait et al., 1990). The SOAPP-R is a self-report measure of risk for opioid medication misuse (Butler, Fernandez, Benoit, et al., 2008).
White Paper AGA: The Impact of Mental and Psychosocial Factors on the Care of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
2017, Clinical Gastroenterology and HepatologyCitation Excerpt :Both measures can identify at-risk patients quickly, so appropriate referral or development of an opioid contract linked to monitoring and non-opioid treatment strategies can be implemented.43,44 Other survey measures to assess pain severity and interference are listed in Table 1 including an example of a visual analogue scale and the Brief Pain Inventory.48–52 Management strategies for pain in digestive diseases have been reviewed elsewhere and are beyond the scope of this paper.53–55
Pain-related distress and clinical depression in chronic pain: A comparison between two measures
2016, Scandinavian Journal of PainCan brief measures effectively screen for pain and somatic malingering? Examination of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire and Pain Disability Index
2014, Spine JournalCitation Excerpt :Initial studies found that the PDI was able to differentiate between high and low disability groups in a postsurgery patient sample [4] and a chronic pain patient sample [24]. Jerome and Gross [25] suggested that the PDI may be useful in assessing additional characteristics of disability (eg, psychological stress and pain behavior). Additionally, the PDI was found to be highly correlated with the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire and reliable in the assessment of subjective disability among a sample of patients with low back pain [26].