Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacovigilance for Children’s Sake

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Child age-specific information on efficacy and risk of medicines can be limited for healthcare professionals and patients. It is therefore very important to make the best use of a risk planned approach to the pharmacological treatment of children. This means pharmacovigilance in the broadest sense of gaining the best data from the use of medicines in clinical practice. We consider issues that complicate safe medication use in paediatric care, as well as current progress and provide suggestions for building knowledge within paediatric pharmacovigilance to be used to minimise patient harm. The continuous development in children constitutes a challenge to prescribing and administering age-suitable doses for individual children. Children are not only different from adults but differ vastly within their own age group. Physical growth during childhood is apparent to the eye, but less obvious is the ongoing maturation of organ function important for drug disposition and action. Systematic issues such as medication errors, off-label use and the lack of age-suitable formulations are considerable obstacles for safe medication use in paediatrics. The recognition of emerging adverse drug reactions could be more challenging in developing children. Initiatives to improve the situation have been made by the WHO and regulators in the USA and EU. Age-specific changes in physiology, pharmacology and psychology, as well as systematic issues specific for children need to be considered in the work of assessing spontaneous reports in children. Pharmacovigilance needs to broaden its aims considerably beyond merely capturing new associations between drugs and events, and encompass careful collection on patient characteristics and circumstances around the reported adverse drug reaction to provide essential information that will give clues on how to prevent harm to children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berry DC. Interpreting information about medication side effects: differences in risk perception and intention to comply when medicines are prescribed for adults or young children. Psychol Health Med. 2004;9:227–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. United Nations. General Assembly. Convention on the rights of the child. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx. Accessed 11 Sep 2013.

  3. Devereux JA, Jones DP, Dickenson DL. Can children withhold consent to treatment? BMJ. 1993;306:1459–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter D, Pierscionek BK. Children, Gillick competency and consent for involvement in research. J Med Ethics. 2007;33:659–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson TN, Rostami-Hodjegan A. Resurgence in the use of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in pediatric clinical pharmacology: parallel shift in incorporating the knowledge of biological elements and increased applicability to drug development and clinical practice. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011;21:291–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization. The importance of pharmacovigilance. Safety monitoring of medicinal products. Geneva: WHO; 2002. http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/pdf/s4893e/s4893e.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2013.

  7. Permala J, Hassali MA, Awaisu A, Shafie AA. Dosing information in a standard drug reference: are pediatrics still therapeutically neglected? Pediatr Int. 2010;52:290–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tan E, Cranswick NE, Rayner CR, Chapman CB. Dosing information for paediatric patients: are they really “therapeutic orphans”? Med J Aust. 2003;179:195–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kimland E, Odlind V. Off-label drug use in pediatric patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91:796–801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Horen B, Montastruc JL, Lapeyre-Mestre M. Adverse drug reactions and off-label drug use in paediatric outpatients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;54:665–70.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Santos DB, Clavenna A, Bonati M, Coelho HL. Off-label and unlicensed drug utilization in hospitalized children in Fortaleza, Brazil. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;64:1111–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Turner S, Nunn AJ, Fielding K, Choonara I. Adverse drug reactions to unlicensed and off-label drugs on paediatric wards: a prospective study. Acta Paediatr. 1999;88:965–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bellis JR, Kirkham JJ, Nunn AJ, Pirmohamed M. Adverse drug reactions and off-label and unlicensed medicines in children: a prospective cohort study of unplanned admissions to a paediatric hospital. Br J Clin Pharmacol. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

  14. Nahata MC. Lack of pediatric drug formulations. Pediatrics. 1999;104:607–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schirm E, Tobi H, de Vries TW, Choonara I, De Jong-van den Berg LT. Lack of appropriate formulations of medicines for children in the community. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92:1486–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nahata MC, Allen LV Jr. Extemporaneous drug formulations. Clin Ther. 2008;30:2112–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pawar S, Kumar A. Issues in the formulation of drugs for oral use in children: role of excipients. Paediatr Drugs. 2002;4:371–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Geiling E, Cannon PR. Pathologic effects of elixir of sulfanilamide (diethylene glycol) poisoning. JAMA. 1938;111:919–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonati M. Once again, children are the main victims of fake drugs. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94:468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Walsh J, Mills S. Formulating better medicines for children: 4th European paediatric formulation initiative conference. Future Sci. 2013;4:21–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Standing JF, Khaki ZF, Wong IC. Poor formulation information in published pediatric drug trials. Pediatrics. 2005;116:e559–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pandit S, Shah U, Kirby DJ, Nunn T, Tuleu C. Inappropriate oral formulations and information in paediatric trials. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:754–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nunn T, Williams J. Formulation of medicines for children. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;59:674–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kearns GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW, Blowey DL, Leeder JS, Kauffman RE. Developmental pharmacology-drug disposition, action, and therapy in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1157–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kearns GL, Wilson JT, Neville KA, Springer MA. Drug therapy in pediatric patients. In: van Boxtel CJ, Santoso B, Edwards IR, editors. Drug benefits and risks international textbook of clinical pharmacology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2008. p. 181–201.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sutherland JM. Fatal cardiovascular collapse of infants receiving large amounts of chloramphenicol. AMA J Dis Child. 1959;97:761–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. West DP, Worobec S, Solomon LM. Pharmacology and toxicology of infant skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1981;76:147–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kunz GJ, Klein KO, Clemons RD, Gottschalk ME, Jones KL. Virilization of young children after topical androgen use by their parents. Pediatrics. 2004;114:282–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kennedy M. Hormonal regulation of hepatic drug-metabolizing enzyme activity during adolescence. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;84:662–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Khan M, Song X, Williams K, Bright K, Sill A, Rakhmanina N. Evaluating adherence to medication in children and adolescents with HIV. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94:970–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaushal R, Bates DW, Landrigan C, McKenna KJ, Clapp MD, Federico F, et al. Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. JAMA. 2001;285:2114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Star K. Safety of medication in paediatrics. Diss. Uppsala University, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Star K, Noren GN, Nordin K, Edwards IR. Suspected adverse drug reactions reported for children worldwide: an exploratory study using VigiBase. Drug Saf. 2011;34:415–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ghaleb MA, Barber N, Franklin BD, Wong IC. The incidence and nature of prescribing and medication administration errors in paediatric inpatients. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:113–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wong IC, Ghaleb MA, Franklin BD, Barber N. Incidence and nature of dosing errors in paediatric medications: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2004;27:661–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Star K, Nordin K, Poder U, Edwards IR. Challenges of safe medication practice in paediatric care—a nursing perspective. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:532–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Conroy S, Sweis D, Planner C, Yeung V, Collier J, Haines L, et al. Interventions to reduce dosing errors in children: a systematic review of the literature. Drug Saf. 2007;30:1111–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gazarian M, Graudins LV. Long-term reduction in adverse drug events: an evidence-based improvement model. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e1334–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schillie SF, Shehab N, Thomas KE, Budnitz DS. Medication overdoses leading to emergency department visits among children. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:181–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The PROTECT Initiative: advancing children’s medication safety. http://www.cdc.gov/medicationsafety/protect/protect_initiative.html. Accessed 12 Sep 2013.

  41. Hampton LM, Nguyen DB, Edwards JR, Budnitz DS. Cough and cold medication adverse events after market withdrawal and labeling revision. Pediatrics. 2013;132:1047–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Clavenna A, Bonati M. Adverse drug reactions in childhood: a review of prospective studies and safety alerts. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94:724–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Silverman WA, Andersen DH, Blanc WA, Crozier DN. A difference in mortality rate and incidence of kernicterus among premature infants allotted to two prophylactic antibacterial regimens. Pediatrics. 1956;18:614–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rang H, Dale M, Ritter J, Moore P. Pharmacology. 5th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dreifuss FE, Langer DH, Moline KA, Maxwell JE. Valproic acid hepatic fatalities. II. US experience since 1984. Neurology. 1989;39:201–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dreifuss FE, Santilli N, Langer DH, Sweeney KP, Moline KA, Menander KB. Valproic acid hepatic fatalities: a retrospective review. Neurology. 1987;37:379–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Chang TK, Abbott FS. Oxidative stress as a mechanism of valproic acid-associated hepatotoxicity. Drug Metab Rev. 2006;38:627–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Micallef J, Star K, Palmaro A, Lapeyre-Mestre M. Detection and magnitude of methylphenidate abuse and misuse using VigiBase and correlation with level of use in Europe [poster; abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21:450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Babl FE, Lewena S, Brown L. Vaccination-related adverse events. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22:514–9 (quiz 20-2).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Arencibia ZB, Sotomayor DN, Mollinedo NC, Choonara I, Manzano EF, Leyva AL. Adverse drug reactions in children in Camaguey Province, Cuba. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:474–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Edwards IR. The management of adverse drug reactions: from diagnosis to signal. Therapie. 2001;56:727–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Star K, Iessa N, Almandil NB, Wilton L, Curran S, Edwards IR, et al. Rhabdomyolysis reported for children and adolescents treated with antipsychotic medicines: a case series analysis. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2012;22:440–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Zaramella P, De Salvia A, Zaninotto M, Baraldi M, Capovilla G, De Leo D, et al. Lethal effect of a single dose of rasburicase in a preterm newborn infant. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e309–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Carmichael M. Drug safety: double jeopardy. Nature. 2013;498:S14–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Diller L. Clinical practice. Adult primary care after childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1417–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Couper MR, Kaplan SE. Promoting safety of medicines in children. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  57. World Health Organization. Essential medicines for children. http://www.who.int/childmedicines/en/. Accessed 10 Sep 2013.

  58. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on conduct of pharmacogivilance for medicines used by the paediatric population. London: European Medicines Agency; 2007. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003764.pdf. Accessed 10 Sep 2013.

  59. Hoppu K, Anabwani G, Garcia-Bournissen F, Gazarian M, Kearns GL, Nakamura H, et al. The status of paediatric medicines initiatives around the world—what has happened and what has not? Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;68:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. FDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Breakdown of FDAAA completed pediatric studies. 2013. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/ucm190622.htm. Accessed 11 Sep 2013.

  61. de Vries TW, van Roon EN. Low quality of reporting adverse drug reactions in paediatric randomised controlled trials. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:1023–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Anderson M, Choonara I. A systematic review of safety monitoring and drug toxicity in published randomised controlled trials of antiepileptic drugs in children over a 10-year period. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:731–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Choonara I. Educational paper: aspects of clinical pharmacology in children–pharmacovigilance and safety. Eur J Pediatr. 2013;172:577–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Menniti-Ippolito G, Raschetti R, Da Cas R, Giaquinto C, Cantarutti L. Active monitoring of adverse drug reactions in children. Italian Paediatric Pharmacosurveillance Multicenter Group. Lancet. 2000;355:1613–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Nasjonalt kompetansenettverk for legemidler til barn. http://www.legemidlertilbarn.no/Sider/default.aspx. Accessed 11 Sep 2013.

  66. Global Research in Paediatrics—Network of Excellence. http://www.grip-network.org/index.php/cms/en/home. Accessed 17 Dec 2013.

  67. Barzaga Arencibia Z, Lopez Leyva A, Mejias Pena Y, Gonzalez Reyes AR, Fernandez Manzano E, Choonara I. Pharmacovigilance in children in Camaguey Province, Cuba. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;68:1079–84.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Carleton B, Poole R, Smith M, Leeder J, Ghannadan R, Ross C, et al. Adverse drug reaction active surveillance: developing a national network in Canada’s children’s hospitals. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18:713–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Madadi P, Ross CJ, Hayden MR, Carleton BC, Gaedigk A, Leeder JS, et al. Pharmacogenetics of neonatal opioid toxicity following maternal use of codeine during breastfeeding: a case–control study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;85:31–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. van Puijenbroek E, Conemans J, van Grootheest K. Spontaneous reports and pharmacogenetics: the role of the pharmacovigilance centre. Drug Saf. 2009;32:357–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Uppsala Monitoring Centre. Rotavirus vaccine and incorrect administration route—a patient safety signal. WHO Signal. 2010 Dec;13–14.

Download references

Acknowledgments

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article. Kristina Star and I. Ralph Edwards have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article. The opinions and conclusions in this study are not necessarily those of the various national pharmacovigilance centres or of the WHO.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina Star.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Star, K., Edwards, I.R. Pharmacovigilance for Children’s Sake. Drug Saf 37, 91–98 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-013-0133-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-013-0133-8

Keywords

Navigation