Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Two Psychological Interventions Are Effective in Severely Disabled, Chronic Back Pain Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial

  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Many pain patients appreciate biofeedback interventions because of the integration of psychological and physiological aspects. Therefore we wanted to investigate in a sample of chronic back pain patients whether biofeedback ingredients lead to improved outcome of psychological interventions.

Method

One hundred and twenty-eight chronic back pain patients were randomly assigned to cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), cognitive-behavioural therapy including biofeedback tools (CBT-B) or waitlist control (WLC). The sample was recruited from a highly disabled group including many patients with low education status and former back surgeries. Measures on pain, physical functioning, emotional functioning, coping strategies and health care utilisation were taken at pretreatment, posttreatment and 6 months of follow-up.

Results

The results indicated significant improvements on most outcome measures for CBT-B and CBT in comparison to WLC. CBT-B and CBT were equally effective (e.g. ITT effect sizes for pain intensity: CBT-B, 0.66 (95% CI 0.39–0.95); CBT, 0.60 (95% CI 0.33–0.87)).

Conclusion

In conclusion, biofeedback ingredients did not lead to improved outcome of a psychological intervention. Cognitive-behavioural treatment as a “package” of respondent, operant and cognitive interventions was effective for ameliorating pain-related symptoms for chronic back pain patients treated in an outpatient setting. The high treatment acceptability associated with biofeedback ingredients can also be achieved with pure psychological interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Please contact Dr. Julia A. Glombiewski (julia.glombiewski@staff.uni-marburg.de) for further information on treatment manual.

References

  1. Schmidt CO, Raspe H, Pfingsten M, Hasenbring M, Basler HD, Eich W, et al. Back pain in the German adult population: prevalence, severity, and sociodemographic correlates in a multiregional survey. Spine. 2007;32:2005–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoffman BM, Papas RK, Chatkoff DK, Kerns RD. Meta-analysis of psychological interventions for chronic low back pain. Health Psychol. 2007;26:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ, Morley SJ, Assendelft WJ. Behavioral treatment for chronic low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine. 2001;26:270–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nigl AJ. A comparison of binary and analog EMG feedback techniques in the treatment of low back pain. Am J Clin Biofeedback. 1981;4:25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Flor H, Birbaumer N. Comparison of the efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and conservative medical interventions in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61:653–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kroener-Herwig B, Beck A. An exploratory study of biofeedback for chronic low back pain. Br J Th Rehab. 2000;7:134–42.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Newton-John TR, Spence SH, Schotte D. Cognitive-behavioural therapy versus EMG biofeedback in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33:691–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hemingway MA, Biedermann HJ, Inglis J. Electromyographic recordings of paraspinal muscles: variations related to subcutaneous tissue thickness. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1995;20:39–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Keefe FJ, Shapira B. EMG-assisted relaxation training in the management of chronic low back pain. Am J Clin Biofeedback. 1981;4:93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nouwen A. EMG biofeedback used to reduce standing levels of paraspinal muscle tension in chronic low back pain. Pain. 1983;17:353–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stuckey SJ, Jacobs A, Goldfarb J. EMG biofeedback training, relaxation training, and placebo for the relief of chronic back pain. Percept Mot Skills. 1986;63:1023–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bush C, Ditto B, Feuerstein M. A controlled evaluation of paraspinal EMG biofeedback in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Health Psychol. 1985;4:307–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Large RG, Lamb AM. Electromyographic (EMG) feedback in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a controlled trial. Pain. 1983;17:167–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005;113:9–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yates SL, Morley S, Eccleston C, Williams ACD. A scale for rating the quality of psychological trials for pain. Pain. 2005;117:314–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Flor H, Turk DC. Psychophysiology of chronic pain: do chronic pain patients exhibit symptom-specific psychophysiological responses? Psychol Bullet. 1989;105:215–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cram JR, Kasman GS, Holtz J. Introduction to surface electromyography. Gaithersburg: Aspen; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nagel B, Gerbershagen HU, Lindena G, Pfingsten M. Entwicklung und empirische Uberprufung des Deutschen Schmerzfragebogens der DGSS. Schmerz. 2002;16:263–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pollard CA. Preliminary validity study of the Pain Disability Index. Percept Mot Skills. 1986;59:974.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Krause S. The pain disability index: psychometric properties. Pain. 1990;40:171–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Myrtek M. Life satisfaction, illness behaviour, and rehabilitation outcome: results of a one year follow-up study with cardiac patients. Int J Rehabil Res. 1987;10:373–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Myrtek M, Fichtler A, Konig K, Brugner G, Muller W. Differences between patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic myocardial infarction: the relevance of psychological factors. Eur Heart J. 1994;15:311–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psych Rev. 1988;8:77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hautzinger M. Das Beck-Depressioninventar (BDI) in der Klinik The German version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) in clinical use. Nervenarzt. 1991;62:689–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Korsholm L, Grunnet Nilsson N, Manniche C. Choice of external criteria in back pain research: Does it matter? Recommendations based on analysis of responsiveness. Pain. 2007;131:112–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Morley S, Williams A, Hussain S. Estimating the clinical effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy in the clinic: Evaluation of a CBT informed pain management programme. Pain. 2008;137:670–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Geissner E. Dimensionen der Verarbeitung chronischer Schmerzen-Eine Replikationsstudie. Z Klin Psychol Psychopathol Psychother. 1992;40:20–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McCracken LM, Vowles KE, Eccleston C. Acceptance-based treatment for persons with complex, long standing chronic pain: a preliminary analysis of treatment outcome in comparison to a waiting phase. Behav Res Ther. 2005;43:1335–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. van Tulder M, Koes B, Bombardier C. Low back pain. Clin Rheumatol. 2002;16:761–75.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Linton SJ. A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine. 2000;25:1148–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Buchner M, Zahlten Hinguranage A, Schiltenwolf M, Neubauer E. Therapy outcome after multidisciplinary treatment for chronic neck and chronic low back pain: a prospective clinical study in 365 patients. Scand J Rheumatol. 2006;35:363–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany

    Julia Anna Glombiewski, Jens Hartwich-Tersek & Winfried Rief

Authors
  1. Julia Anna Glombiewski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jens Hartwich-Tersek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Winfried Rief
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Anna Glombiewski.

Additional information

The study was supported by a doctoral thesis scholarship from the University of Marburg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glombiewski, J.A., Hartwich-Tersek, J. & Rief, W. Two Psychological Interventions Are Effective in Severely Disabled, Chronic Back Pain Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Int.J. Behav. Med. 17, 97–107 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9070-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9070-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation