Abstract
Background
Neonatal screening is helpful to prevent serious disabitily and sufferings caused by congenital or inherited disease. This study was to review the status of neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism (CH) and phenylketonuria (PKU) in China.
Methods
We analyzed data of neonatal screening for CH and PKU in the past two decades which were obtained from the national network of neonatal screening centers collected by the National Center for Clinical Laboratory.
Results
Of 18.8 million newborns screened from 1985 to 2007, 9198 were identified with CH, giving a prevalence of 1/2047. In 19.0 million newborns screened in the same period, 1638 had PKU, with a prevalence of 1/11 572. An increasing number of neonates have been subjected to neonatal screening in China annually during this period. Data from Zhejiang Neonatal Screening Center showed that the recall rate of neonates suspected with CH and PKU was 95.52% in 2007. Confirmatory tests were performed and treatments were initiated in most of the neonates with CH and PKU within a month after birth.
Conclusions
More governmental support at different levels is needed to make neonatal screening more efficient. The screening should be improved with a satisfactory control system including shorter time of report and a higher recall rate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Geelhoed EA, Lewis B, Hounsome D, O’leary P. Economic evaluation of neonatal screening for phenylketonuria and congenital hypothyroidism. J Paediatr Child Health 2005;41:575–579.
Gu XF, Wang JJ, Ye J, Cheng XM. A cost-benefit evaluation of neonatal screening for phenylketonuria and congenital hypothyroidism. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2000;34:147–149.
Therrell BL, Johnson A, Williams D. Status of newborn screening programs in the United States. Pediatrics 2006;117:S212–S252.
Xu YH, Qin YF, Zhao ZY. Retrospective study on neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism and phenylketomuria in China in the past 22 years. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 2009;47:18–22.
Mao HQ, Xu YH, Cao LP, Yang RL, Zhou XL. The relationship between the value of blood thyroid stimulating hormone on filter paper and the detection rate for congenital thyroidism. Zhejiang Yu Fang Yi Xue 2006;18:48.
Gu XF, Wang ZG. Screening for phenylketonuria and congenital hypothyroidism in 5.8 million neonates in China. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2004;38:99–102.
Tian GL. Neonatal screening in several regions of Shanghai in the past 18 years. Chin Prev Med 2004;5:484–485.
Wang J, Wang BZ, Zhang Z, Hu YL, Zhao DH, Su L, et al. Screening and group distribute regularity of congenital hypothyroidism of neonatal in Henan province. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2006;27:825–826.
Chen XX, Yang RL, Shi YH, Cao LP, Zhou XL, Mao HQ, et al. Screening for congenital hypothyroidism in neonates of Zhejiang Province during 1999–2004. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2005;34:304–307.
Zhang YM. Neonatal screening in Beijing in the past 10 years. Chin Primary Health Care 2001;15:39–40.
Huo JP, Cai ZY, Hu DB, Cao XY, Chen HW. Neonatal screening in Zhanjiang area in the past 8 years. Chin J Child Health Care 2006;14:526–527.
Toublanc JE. Guidelines for neonatal screening programs for congenital hypothyroidism. Working Group for Neonatal Screening in Paediatric Endocrinology of the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1999;88:13–14.
Korada M, Kibirige M, Turner S, Day J, Johnstone H, Cheetham T. The implementation of revised guidelines and the performance of a screening programme for congenital hypothyroidism. J Med Screen 2008;15:5–8.
Gu XF, Zhou JD, Ye J. Neonatal screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia in Shanghai areas. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2002;36:16–18.
Levy HL. Newborn screening by tandem mass spectrometry: a new era. Clin Chem 1998;44:2401–2402.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhan, JY., Qin, YF. & Zhao, ZY. Neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism and phenylketonuria in China. World J Pediatr 5, 136–139 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-009-0027-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-009-0027-0