Skip to main content
Log in

Distinguishing Jones and Proximal Diaphyseal Fractures of the Fifth Metatarsal

  • Original Article
  • Foot
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Abstract

Jones and proximal diaphyseal fractures of the fifth metatarsal are in close anatomic proximity and often are difficult to differentiate. We determined whether it is necessary to differentiate between these two diagnoses. Retrospectively, the two diagnoses were identified radiographically using an accepted classification scheme. Initial management is nonoperative; however, intramedullary screw fixation is performed for competitive athletes, or others with displaced fractures, or delayed union or nonunion. Outcomes were analyzed using Student’s t tests, whereas nominal data were analyzed using chi square tests. Thirty-two Jones fractures and 29 proximal diaphyseal fractures were identified. All fractures healed between 4.8 and 9.8 months with a 78% to 82% patient satisfaction rate. Regardless of treatment, the clinical outcomes were not different between the two fracture locations. Shorter return to sport time was observed in operatively treated patients. Operatively treated patients with fracture site sclerosis or medullary canal obliteration on radiographs had lower satisfaction and higher complication rates than patients without these changes. Based on our findings, we do not find a reason to distinguish between fractures of the fifth metatarsal in these two locations. We suggest referring to fifth metatarsal base fractures (excluding avulsions) as Jones fractures.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buckwalter JA, Einhorn TA, Marsh JL. Bone and joint healing. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown CM, eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005:50–98.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clapper MF, O’Brien TJ, Lyons PM. Fractures of the fifth metatarsal: analysis of a fracture registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;315:238–241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dameron TB Jr. Fractures and anatomical variations of the proximal portion of the fifth metatarsal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57:788–792.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dameron TB Jr. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal: selecting the best treatment option. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3:110–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DeLee JC, Evans JP, Julian J. Stress fractures of the fifth metatarsal. Am J Sports Med. 1983;11:349–353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fetzer GB, Wright RW. Metatarsal shaft fractures and fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25:139–150, x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones R. Fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal bone by indirect violence. Ann Surg. 1902;35:697–700.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kavanaugh JH, Brower TD, Mann RV. The Jones fracture revisited. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:776–782.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Konkel KF, Menger AG, Retzlaff SA. Nonoperative treatment of fifth metatarsal fractures in an orthopaedic suburban private multispeciality practice. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:704–707.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuhlman JE, Fishman EK, Magid D, Scott WW Jr, Brooker AF, Siegelman SS. Fracture nonunion: CT assessment with multiplanar reconstruction. Radiology. 1988;167:483–488.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lawrence SJ, Botte MJ. Jones’ fractures and related fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot Ankle. 1993;14:358–365.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lehman RC, Torg JS, Pavlov H, De Lee JC. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity: a review. Foot Ankle. 1987;7:245–252.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McClelland D, Thomas PB, Bancroft G, Moorcraft CI. Fracture healing assessment comparing stiffness measurements using radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;457:214–219.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nunley JA. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: The Jones fracture. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001;32:171–180.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Portland G, Kelikian A, Kodros S. Acute surgical management of Jones’ fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:829–833.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Quill GE Jr. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Orthop Clin North Am. 1995;26:353–361.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenberg GA, Sferra JJ. Treatment strategies for acute fractures and nonunions of the proximal fifth metatarsal. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:332–338.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith JW, Arnoczky SP, Hersh A. The interosseous blood supply of the fifth metatarsal: implication for proximal fracture healing. Foot Ankle. 1992;13:143–152.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart IM. Jones fracture: fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1960;16:190–198.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Torg JS, Balduini FC, Zelko RR, Pavlov H, Peff TC, Das M. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity: classification and guidelines for non-surgical and surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:209–214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weinfeld SB, Haddad SL, Myerson MS. Metatarsal stress fractures. Clin Sports Med. 1997;16:319–338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wright RW, Fischer DA, Shively RA, Heidt RS Jr, Nuber GW. Refracture of proximal fifth metatarsal (Jones) fracture after intramedullary screw fixation in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:732–736.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zelko RR, Torg JS, Rachun A. Proximal diaphyseal fractures of the fifth metatarsal: treatment of the fractures and their complications in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1979;7:95–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the medical record department for assistance in processing the patient information.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin M. Queen PhD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

About this article

Cite this article

Chuckpaiwong, B., Queen, R.M., Easley, M.E. et al. Distinguishing Jones and Proximal Diaphyseal Fractures of the Fifth Metatarsal. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466, 1966–1970 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0222-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0222-7

Keywords

Navigation