Skip to main content
Log in

Recruitment and Screening for a Randomized Trial Investigating Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass versus Intensive Medical Management for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Large-scale randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the role of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Recruitment challenges must be understood.

Methods

One hundred twenty participants were needed for a prospective randomized controlled trial investigating treatments for hyperglycemia and cardiovascular disease risk factors in patients with T2DM. The trial had two arms—intensive medical management plus a rigorous lifestyle intervention (LS/IMM) versus LS/IMM with RYGB. Medical inclusion criteria included glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥8.0 % while under the care of a physician and body mass index (BMI) 30.0–39.9 kg/m2. Another inclusion criterion was expressed willingness to accept randomization and participate fully. Varied recruitment strategies were employed at four academic hospitals in the USA and Taiwan, including referrals, mass media, direct mail to patients drawn from a practice-based database, and direct mail to commercial mailing lists.

Results

Between February 2008 and December 2011, 2,648 candidates were phone-screened and 240 were screened on site; 120 participants were eventually randomized. Impediments included stringent medical inclusion criteria and a lack of equipoise (i.e., strong beliefs or preferences) among patients and their personal community-based physicians. To meet timeline requirements, the upper limit for BMI was increased from 34.9 to 39.9 kg/m2 and an additional site was added.

Conclusions

We successfully recruited 120 participants with poorly controlled T2DM and mild to moderate obesity. Participants had to be willing to accept randomization to either surgical or nonsurgical treatments. Recruitment took 4 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body Mass Index

CUMC:

Columbia University Medical Center in New York, NY

DSS:

Diabetes Surgery Study

HbA1c:

Glycated Hemoglobin

Taiwan:

Two closely related clinics in Taiwan

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Mayo:

Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN

UMN:

University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, MN

References

  1. Ryan DH, Kushner R. The state of obesity and obesity research. JAMA. 2010;304:1835–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:724–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen RV, Pinehiro JC, Schiavon CA, et al. Effects of gastric bypass surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes and only mild obesity. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:140–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Diabetes Federation Taskforce on Epidemiology and Prevention. Bariatric surgical and procedural interventions in treatment of obese patients with type 2 diabetes. 2011. www.idf.org/webdata/docs/IDF-Position-Statement-Bariatric-Surgery.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2012.

  5. Zimmet P, Alberti KG. Surgery or medical therapy for obese patients with type 2 Diabetes? N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1635–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. American Diabetes Association position statement. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:S11–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ikramuddin S, Korner J, Lee WJ, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus intensive medical management for the control of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. The Diabetes Surgery Study Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2013;309(21):2240–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dixon JB, O’Brien PE, Playfair J, et al. Adjustable gastric banding and conventional therapy for type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299:316–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1577–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schauer PR, Kashyan S, Wolski K, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1567–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ryan DH, Espeland MA, Foster GD, et al. Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes): design and methods for a clinical trial of weight loss for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Control Clin Trials. 2003;24:610–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sung N, Crowley WF, Genel M. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA. 2003;289:1278–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, et al. What influences recruitment to randomized controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006;7:9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kashyap Sangeeta R, Bhatt Deepak L, Schauer Philip R, et al. Bariatric surgery vs. advanced practice medical management in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: rationale and design of the Surgical Therapy And Medications Potentially Eradicate Diabetes Efficiently trial (STAMPEDE). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010;12:452–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statements

All authors except for Dr. Leslie received salary support from Covidien for conducting the study and reporting results. Ms. Thomas, Ms. Bainbridge, Ms. Chen, Dr. Connett, Dr. Lee, Dr. Leslie and Ms. Schone have nothing further to disclose. Dr. Ikramuddin further reports personal fees from Novo Nordisk, personal fees from Medica, personal fees from OptumHealth, personal fees from Metamodix Inc, personal fees from Covidien, grants from EnteroMedics, and grants from Reshape Medical. Dr. Jensen further reports personal fees from Novo-Nordisk, personal fees from Eisai, and personal fees from Vivus. Dr. Korner further reports personal fees from Johnson and Johnson, personal fees from Nutrisystem, personal fees from Federal Trade Commission, and personal fees from Office of Professional Misconduct.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avis J. Thomas.

Additional information

This study was supported by a research grant from Covidien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, A.J., Bainbridge, H.A., Schone, J.L. et al. Recruitment and Screening for a Randomized Trial Investigating Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass versus Intensive Medical Management for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes. OBES SURG 24, 1875–1880 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1280-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1280-4

Keywords

Navigation