Skip to main content
Log in

Reasons for Choice of Referral Physician Among Primary Care and Specialist Physicians

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Specialty referral patterns can affect health care costs as well as clinical outcomes. For a given clinical problem, referring physicians usually have a choice of several physicians to whom they can refer. Once the decision to refer is made, the choice of individual physician may have important downstream effects.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the reasons why primary care and specialist physicians choose certain specific colleagues to refer to and how those reasons differ by specialty.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional Web-based survey supplemented with analysis of administrative claims data.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 616 physicians in office-based patient care specialties who were members of an academic physicians’ organization and treated Medicare patients in 2006.

MAIN MEASURES

A total of 386 respondents (63% response rate) were presented with a “roster” of other physicians’ names with whom we predicted they had a relationship based on sharing Medicare patients. Among physicians in their “professional network” (consisting of any listed physician with whom respondents acknowledged a professional relationship), respondents reported if they referred to those physicians, and if so, provided up to two reasons why they referred to that particular colleague. Using logistic regression, we examined the likelihood that different specialists would endorse specific reasons for referring to chosen colleagues.

KEY RESULTS

Primary care physicians (PCPs) initiated referrals to 66% of their “professional network” colleagues, while medical and surgical specialists initiated referrals to 49% and 52%, respectively (p < 0.001 for both versus PCPs). After adjustment, medical specialists were less likely than PCPs to cite ease of communication with colleagues (RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.49–0.91), and medical and surgical specialists were less likely than PCPs to cite “shares my medical record system” as a reason to refer (medical specialist RR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.03–0.40, surgical specialist RR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.05–0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Specialists frequently initiate referrals, bypassing PCPs. In choosing specific physicians to refer to, PCPs are more often concerned with between-physician communication and patient access. Modifying referral practices among doctors may need to account for such patterns of behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glenn JK, Lawler FH, Hoerl MS. Physician referrals in a competitive environment. An estimate of the economic impact of a referral. JAMA. 1987;258:1920–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boulware LE, Troll MU, Jaar BG, Myers DI, Powe NR. Identification and referral of patients with progressive CKD: a national study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48:192–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Franks P, Zwanziger J, Mooney C, Sorbero M. Variations in primary care physician referral rates. Health Serv Res. 1999;34:323–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Forrest CB, Nutting PA, Starfield B, von Schrader S. Family physicians' referral decisions: results from the ASPN referral study. J Fam Pract. 2002;51:215–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schneider EC, Epstein AM. Influence of cardiac-surgery performance reports on referral practices and access to care. A survey of cardiovascular specialists. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:251–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Selby JV, Schmittdiel JA, Lee J, et al. Meaningful variation in performance: what does variation in quality tell us about improving quality? Med Care. 2010;48:133–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Safran DG, Karp M, Coltin K, et al. Measuring patients' experiences with individual primary care physicians. Results of a statewide demonstration project. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:13–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sirovich B, Gottlieb D, Welch H, Fisher E. Variation in the Tendency of Primary Care Physicians to Intervene. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2005;165:2252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lucas FL, Sirovich BE, Gallagher PM, Siewers AE, Wennberg DE. Variation in cardiologists' propensity to test and treat: is it associated with regional variation in utilization? Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3:253–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Song Z, Safran DG, Landon BE, et al. Health Care Spending and Quality in Year 1 of the Alternative Quality Contract. New England Journal of Medicine;0.

  11. Javalgi R, Joseph WB, Gombeski WR Jr, Lester JA. How physicians make referrals. J Health Care Mark. 1993;13:6–17.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kinchen K, Cooper L, Levine D, Wang N, Powe N. Referral of patients to specialists: factors affecting choice of specialist by primary care physicians. Ann Family Med. 2004;2:245–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Forrest CB, Nutting PA, von Schrader S, Rohde C, Starfield B. Primary care physician specialty referral decision making: patient, physician, and health care system determinants. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:76–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Forrest CB, Reid RJ. Prevalence of health problems and primary care physicians' specialty referral decisions. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:427–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shea D, Stuart B, Vasey J, Nag S. Medicare physician referral patterns. Health Serv Res. 1999;34:331–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Forrest CB. A typology of specialists' clinical roles. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1062–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barnett ML, Landon BE, O'Malley AJ, Keating NL, Christakis NA. Mapping Physician Networks with Self-Reported and Administrative Data. Health Serv Res, Epub April 28, 2011.

  18. Pagano M, Gauvreau K. Principles of Biostatistics: 2nd Edition. 2nd ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Carey VJ. gee: Generalized Estimation Equation solver. In. R package version 4.13-16 ed; 2010.

  20. Zhang J, Yu KF. What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280:1690–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. King G, Tomz M, Wittenberg J. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. Am J Polit Sci. 2000;44:341–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2009.

  23. Imai K, King G, Lau O. Zelig: Everyone's Statistical Software. In. R package version 3.4-8 ed; 2010.

  24. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83:457–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Keirns CC, Goold SD. Patient-centered care and preference-sensitive decision making. JAMA. 2009;302:1805–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bergeson SC, Dean JD. A systems approach to patient-centered care. JAMA. 2006;296:2848–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:742–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Contributors

We gratefully acknowledge Georgina Barahona for research assistance, and Laurie Meneades for expert data management and technical support.

Funders

Supported by a grant from National Institute of Aging (P-01 AG-031093). Mr. Barnett’s effort was supported by a Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Clinical Research Fellowship and a Harvard Medical School Research Fellowship.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce E. Landon MD, MBA.

APPENDIX TABLE

APPENDIX TABLE

Table 5 Characteristics of Respondents and Non-respondents

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barnett, M.L., Keating, N.L., Christakis, N.A. et al. Reasons for Choice of Referral Physician Among Primary Care and Specialist Physicians. J GEN INTERN MED 27, 506–512 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1861-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1861-z

KEY WORDS

Navigation