Skip to main content
Log in

Financial Incentives for Extended Weight Loss: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Previous efforts to use incentives for weight loss have resulted in substantial weight regain after 16 weeks.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a longer term weight loss intervention using financial incentives.

DESIGN

A 32-week, three-arm randomized controlled trial of financial incentives for weight loss consisting of a 24-week weight loss phase during which all participants were given a weight loss goal of 1 pound per week, followed by an 8-week maintenance phase.

PARTICIPANTS

Veterans who were patients at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center with BMIs of 30–40.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomly assigned to participate in either a weight-monitoring program involving a consultation with a dietician and monthly weigh-ins (control condition), or the same program with one of two financial incentive plans. Both incentive arms used deposit contracts (DC) in which participants put their own money at risk (matched 1:1), which they lost if they failed to lose weight. In one incentive arm participants were told that the period after 24 weeks was for weight-loss maintenance; in the other, no such distinction was made.

MAIN MEASURE

Weight loss after 32 weeks.

KEY RESULTS

Results were analyzed using intention-to-treat. There was no difference in weight loss between the incentive arms (P = 0.80). Incentive participants lost more weight than control participants [mean DC = 8.70 pounds, mean control = 1.17, P = 0.04, 95% CI of the difference in means (0.56, 14.50)]. Follow-up data 36 weeks after the 32-week intervention had ended indicated weight regain; the net weight loss between the incentive and control groups was no longer significant (mean DC = 1.2 pounds, 95% CI, -2.58–5.00; mean control = 0.27, 95% CI, -3.77–4.30, P = 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

Financial incentives produced significant weight loss over an 8-month intervention; however, participants regained weight post-intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Ogden C, Carroll M, Curtin L, McDowell M, Tabak C, Flegal K. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States. J Am Med Assoc. 2006;393(15):1549–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeffery RW, Thompson PD, Wing RR. Effects on weight reduction of strong monetary contracts for calorie restriction or weight loss. Behav Res Ther. 1978;16(5):363–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jeffery R, Drewnowski A, Epstein L. Long-term maintenance of weight loss. Health Psychol. 2000;19(1 Suppl):5–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. NIH. (United States Department of Health and Human Services). NIH Guide: Findings of Scientific Misconduct. 2001 December 13, 2001.

  5. Heshka S, Anderson J, Atkinson R, et al. Weight loss with self-help compared with a structured commercial program: a randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;2003(289):14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Loewenstein G, Brennan T, Volpp KG. Asymmetric paternalism to improve health behaviors. J Am Med Assoc. 2007;298(20):2415–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Volpp K, John L, Troxel AB, Norton L, Fassbender J, Loewenstein G. Financial incentive-based approaches for weight loss: a randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2008;300(22):2631–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47:263–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ryan D, Espeland M, Foster G, et al. Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes): design and methods for a clinical trial of weight loss for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Control Clin Trials. 2003;24(5):610–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ariely D, Wertenbroch K. Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: self-control by precommitment. Psychol Sci. 2002;13(3):219–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):393–403.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Svenson O, Fischhoff B, MacGregor D. Perceived driving safety and seatbelt usage. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 1985;17(2):119-133.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: Conclusions from a community-wide sample Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1987;10(5):1573-3521.

  14. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Q J Econ. 1991;106(4):1039–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ainslie G. Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychol Bull. 1975;82:463–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thaler RH. Some empirical evidence on time inconsistency. Rev Econ Stud. 1981;23:165–80.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Loewenstein G, Prelec D. Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Q J Econ. 1992;107:573–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirby K. Bidding on the future: evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1997;126:54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Griffin D, Buehler R. Frequency, probability, and prediction: easy solutions to cognitive illusions? Cogn Psychol. 1999;38:48–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Locke EA, Latham GP.A theory of goal setting and task performance Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Contributors

Daniel McDonald

Funders

USDA, Economic Research Service (grant no. 58-4000-7-0058) and the Hewlett Foundation.

Prior Presentations

Annual Meeting of the Society for General Internal Medicine, Minneapolis, May, 2010.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie K. John MS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

John, L.K., Loewenstein, G., Troxel, A.B. et al. Financial Incentives for Extended Weight Loss: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J GEN INTERN MED 26, 621–626 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1628-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1628-y

KEY WORDS

Navigation