Abstract
Objective
Secrets and issues of confidentiality are critical concerns in doctor–patient communication and fundamental aspects of every medical encounter. Nevertheless, the nature, content, prevalence, impact, and consequences of secrets in medicine have largely been unexplored. This study investigates the role of secrets in primary care. It describes the intuitive strategies used by primary care physicians to cope with secrets, provides a categorization system, and suggests a conceptual model.
Design
Focus groups of primary care physicians were the principal data collection method employed. Transcripts from 8 focus groups were analyzed using an “immersion–crystallization” framework involving cycles of concentrated textual review of data. Insights from this iterative process and from the literature were employed in the construction of contextual types, content categories, processes, and models.
Participants
Sixty-one family physicians and general practitioners in Israel with a wide variety of seniority, ethnic, religious, and immigration backgrounds.
Setting
Locations in the north, south, and center of Israel.
Results
Analysis revealed insights about definitions, prevalence, process, and content of secrets in primary care. The main content findings centered on categories of secrets such as propensity to secrecy, toxicity of secrets, and the special nature of secrets in family medicine. The main process findings regarded the life cycle of secrets and doctors’ coping strategies. Based on our findings and a review of the literature, a conceptual model of secrets in primary care is proposed.
Conclusions
The importance and impact of secrets are significant part of daily medical practice. Further research is needed to enhance physicians’ effective and ethical handling of secrets and secrecy in practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biderman A, Borkan JM, Reis S. Reflections on chapter 9: Secrets. In: Borkan J, Reis S, Steinmatz D, Medalie J, eds. Patients and Doctors: Life-Changing Stories from Primary Care. Wisconsin University Press; 1999:169–71.
Burnum JF. Secrets about patients. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(16):1130–3.
Eisenberg JM. Can you keep a secret? Measuring the performance of those entrusted with personal health information. (Edit.). J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:132–4.
Welch CA. Sacred secrets—the privacy of medical records. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:371–2.
GIVIO (Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation, Italy). What doctors tell patients with breast cancer about diagnosis and treatment: findings from a study in general hospitals. Br J Cancer. 1986;54:319–326.
Good MJD. American oncology and the discourse on hope. Cult Med Psychiatry. 1990;14:59–79.
Imber-Black E. Secrets in Families and Family Therapy. New York: WW Norton; 1993.
Bok S. Secrets. Pantheon books 1982.
Bok S. Lying. Vintage books 1999.
Petronio S. Boundries of Privacy. SUNY Press; 2002.
Bradshaw J. Family Secrets. Bantam books; 1995.
Pelligrino ED. Secrets of the couch and the grave. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1996;5(2):189–203.
Robinson I. Confidentiality for whom? Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(3):279–86.
Barbour RS. Making sense of focus groups. Med Educ. 2005;39:742–50.
Borkan JM. Crystallization–immersion. In: Crabtree B, Miller W, eds. Doing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications; 1999:179–94.
Mytton O. Should doctors talk to relatives without a competent patient’s consent? J Med Ethics. 2005;31:266.
Sobel R. Deception/trust. Isr J Med Sci. 1996;32:256–9.
Newman NK. Family secrets: a challenge for family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1993;494–496.
Morse D, Beckman H, Seaburn D, McDaniel S, Silberman J, Epstein R. Enough about you: let’s talk about me: self disclosure in the patient–physician encounter. Abst 351.AAPP forum, Chicago 10.2005.
Petronio S, Sargent J. Disclosure Surprises: Impact on Nurses of Patient Revelations that are Inappropriate, Too Private, or Too Much Abstract 311 AAPP forum, Chicago 10.2005.
Perez-Carceles MD, Pereniguez JE, Osuna E, Luna A. Balancing confidentiality and the information provided to families of patients in primary care. J Med Ethics. 2005;31(9):531–5 (Sep.).
Acknowledgments
The authors received no funding for this work.
Conflict of Interest
None disclosed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reis, S., Biderman, A., Mitki, R. et al. Secrets in Primary Care: A Qualitative Exploration and Conceptual Model. J GEN INTERN MED 22, 1246–1253 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0186-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0186-4